Skip to content
Bret Pimentel, woodwinds

Bret Pimentel, woodwinds

  • AboutExpand
    • Cookie Policy
  • Resources and toolsExpand
    • Woodwind Doubling in Musicals
    • Fingering Diagram Builder
    • Random Note Picker
    • Note Image Generator
    • More…
  • Lessons
  • Shop
Email YouTube TikTok Facebook Instagram Amazon RSS
Bret Pimentel, woodwinds
Bret Pimentel, woodwinds
  • Product reviews

    Review: D’Addario Select Jazz alto saxophone mouthpieces

    ByBret Pimentel June 8, 2015June 23, 2015

    I like mouthpieces that are easy to play, especially in terms of response and tuning. But I also really like something easy to replace; I don’t like the idea of a mouthpiece that is so expensive, variable, or rare that if I drop it I can’t just order a new one, have it in a few days, and expect it to play like the old one.

    A few years back I did a fairly detailed review of the Rico Reserve clarinet mouthpieces (in two parts), and have been happily using the Reserves as my main clarinet mouthpieces ever since. The Reserves are, in particular, astonishingly consistent from specimen to specimen, presumably due to the very precise tooling that obviates the need for hand-finishing (which sounds cool but ultimately means a relatively high degree of variability).

    The pro-line products formerly released under the Rico name are now D’Addario Woodwinds products, and they now include some alto saxophone mouthpieces, the Select Jazz series. I was pleased to hear from a contact at D’Addario Woodwinds who sent me some samples to try out.

    My point of reference is the various Meyer-ish alto mouthpieces I have played for about the last 20 years, most recently the V16 series from Vandoren. I used the A6/medium chamber for a number of years, but more recently switched to the A6/small chamber, which gave me a little more bite in my sound that works well for me in louder situations (like big band lead playing, or blues gigs here in the Mississippi Delta) without having to strain as much.

    The new D’Addario Select Jazz alto mouthpieces are currently available in three flavors, the D5M, the D6M, and the D7M. Larger numbers in the middle correspond to larger tip openings (details at D’Addario’s website). I got a couple of each to try. Each one says “medium chamber” on the box, so maybe D’Addario is considering other chamber sizes. At the moment street price seems to be a little higher than the V16s, but still basically in the same class.

    If you read the second part of my Reserve mouthpiece review, then you won’t be surprised to see that the Select Jazz mouthpieces are extremely consistent. Check out the very even and symmetrical rails and tips.

    L-R: two each of the D5M, D6M, and D7M. Click for higher resolution.
    L-R: two each of the D5M, D6M, and D7M. Click for higher resolution.

    As mentioned in a couple of other reviews, the Select Jazz mouthpieces have an unusually tight fit on the neck cork, and they chewed up my aging cork a bit. Cork grease!

    The mouthpieces have individual serial numbers, like the Reserve clarinet mouthpieces. When I asked about this during my clarinet mouthpiece review, the Rico/D’Addario rep told me there might in the future be some way of registering your mouthpiece online, maybe to access some kind of members-only content. I haven’t seen anything happen along these lines, so maybe there’s a more logical explanation, like that the numbers are just for quality control.

    Here is a sound clip of each of the six mouthpieces I received, plus my two V16 mouthpieces for comparison. For all the sound clips I used the same inexpensive fake-leather-type ligature, but different reeds, a D’Addario Select Jazz filed 3S and a filed 3M, depending on which worked best with each individual mouthpiece. The V16s and the Jazz Select D5Ms worked better with the 3M reed, and the Jazz Select D6Ms and D7Ms seemed to prefer the 3S reed.

    D’Addario Select Jazz D5M, specimen #1

    https://bretpimentel.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/SJ51.mp3

    D’Addario Select Jazz D5M, specimen #2

    https://bretpimentel.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/SJ52.mp3

    D’Addario Select Jazz D6M, specimen #1

    https://bretpimentel.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/SJ61.mp3

    D’Addario Select Jazz D6M, specimen #2

    https://bretpimentel.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/SJ62.mp3

    D’Addario Select Jazz D7M, specimen #1

    https://bretpimentel.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/SJ71.mp3

    D’Addario Select Jazz D7M, specimen #2

    https://bretpimentel.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/SJ72.mp3

    My old Vandoren V16 A6M

    https://bretpimentel.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/V16M.mp3

    My old Vandoren V16 A6S

    https://bretpimentel.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/V16S.mp3

     

    The differences are minor at best, and really in a pinch I could make any of these eight mouthpieces work, but here are a few observations:

    • The Select Jazz mouthpieces have noticeably more stable intonation than the V16s, especially the D5M. This is a bigger deal than tone, which is more malleable and more subjective.
    • The Select Jazz mouthpieces are, again, very consistent. This is the killer feature of D’Addario’s mouthpieces. I found the two D5Ms to be virtually interchangeable in terms of tone, response, and tuning, and the two D7Ms too. One of the D6Ms (#2) has, to my ear, just a tiny bit of an edge that I find unpleasant. I suspect that this one is slightly “off,” but the difference between the two is still quite minor compared to the differential in hand-finished production mouthpieces.
    • I do still want something with some edge to it, and the V16 small chamber still feels like is has more of that than any of the seven others, but not by much. The Select Jazz mouthpieces seem to have a bigger core and body to the sound, plus a bit higher volume, so I’m thinking it may be an acceptable tradeoff as far as making my presence known among the electric guitars.
    • Overall, I find the Select Jazz to respond better both down low in the staff and up above it than the V16s do. I didn’t play any altissimo in the sound clips, but I find the Select Jazz to have a slight advantage in that register as well.
    • The D5M and, to a lesser extent, the D6M, seem to be the best fit for my style and needs. The D7M doesn’t work as well for me—it has the louder but more spread tone and less-stable intonation you might expect from a larger tip opening—but it’s still one of the best mouthpieces I’ve played in that category, and it’s really only slightly large, not nearly as extreme as the tip openings offered by some other makers.

    I think the Select Jazz D5M is going to be my new mouthpiece. (I’m keeping a D6M in my case for now too until I can try them both on a loud blues gig, but so far the D5M has worked well for small-group jazz.) The combination of solid intonation, pretty-but-gutsy tone, budget-friendly price, and amazing consistency make this a solid, versatile, and practical option for a working saxophonist. They are great for educators, too—they are easy to recommend to students because they are so easy to play and because they are so reliable in quality (much less need to order a half-dozen on approval and hope there’s a “good” one in the bunch). A great all-around, no-nonsense alto jazz mouthpiece.

    I look forward to more offerings from D’Addario Woodwinds, perhaps alto mouthpieces in other chamber sizes, or mouthpieces for other saxophones.

    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Review: D’Addario Select Jazz alto saxophone mouthpiecesContinue

  • Favorite blog posts

    Favorite blog posts, May 2015

    ByBret Pimentel May 31, 2015January 1, 2018

    Good stuff from the woodwind blogs in May:

    • Cate Hummel offers tips on diagnosing flute tone issues.
    • Felix from The Saxophone Corner takes a closer look at the mythology of the Selmer Mark VI.
    • Oboist Jennet Ingle uses powerful breath support.
    • Saxophonist Bill Plake suggests four questions to ask yourself while practicing.
    • Bassoonist William Short shares an infographic on practicing.
    • Saxophonist Sam Newsome discusses confident performance in a couple of posts.
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Favorite blog posts, May 2015Continue

  • Woodwind playing and pedagogy

    Clarinet and saxophone embouchures and the “chin”

    ByBret Pimentel May 18, 2015March 14, 2017

    The chin is much-discussed in clarinet pedagogy. Keith Stein suggests a “stretching” of the chin, making it feel “long and pointed” and “rather hard.” David Pino, a student of Stein’s, echoes this. Jane Ellsworth describes a chin that is “drawn downward” (while the jaw provides a “controlled” “upward pressure.” Michele Gingras advocates a “flat” chin. Bil Jackson indicates that the chin “flattens naturally” when the lip configuration and voicing are correct. Tom Ridenour explains that the chin should be “down and flat” and that this happens “virtually automatically” as a result of proper voicing.

    The chin gets somewhat less attention in saxophone teaching, but some pedagogical examples can be found. Larry Teal indicates that the “chin muscles” should support the lower lip (as the jaw drops downward), and Timothy McAllister agrees. Tracy Heavner recommends that the chin muscles be “held flat against the chin” with a sensation of those muscles “pushing … down and away from the body.” Brian Utley advocates a “firm but relaxed [chin] position.”

    Most of these sources seem to generally agree that the “chin” (or something) must be flattened or stretched or firmed in some way. Let’s look more closely at exactly what is being described, and how it does or doesn’t differ from the clarinet to the saxophone.

    “Chin” is probably not a specific enough term for our purposes. Is it a bony structure? a muscular one? The pedagogical literature is rather unclear and contradictory about exactly how the “chin” moves, and even whether it is actively engaged or whether its movement is a result of some other thing moving.

    Additionally, there is a common misconception in single-reed teaching that the lower lip forms a “cushion,” without which the teeth would contact the reed. This creates an embouchure that is formed by pressure from the jaw, with the lips serving passively as a gasket, and the lower lip taking quite a bit of abuse from the lower teeth.

    A better way to form the embouchure is to bring the jaw (and teeth, and chin) down, away from the reed, and allow the muscles of the lips to form the embouchure. This moves the effort from the larger, stronger jaw muscles to the smaller but more supple muscles of the lips (of the citations above, Teal’s describes this the most clearly). For early beginners (or those who have played for many years with unnecessary jaw pressure and the resulting shredded lower lip) it may be necessary to gradually develop a little endurance in those muscles.

    Taking this approach, it becomes clear that the pointing/stretching/whatever, which is actually mostly jaw movement, must be more extreme for the clarinet than for the saxophone, to accommodate the clarinet’s steeper angle.

    Left: clarinet jaw position (more open). Right: saxophone jaw position (less open).
    Left: clarinet jaw position (more open). Right: saxophone jaw position (less open). Note that the lower teeth clear the reed; the lip will rise to meet the reed and form a muscle-based (rather than jaw/teeth-based) embouchure.

    However, the chin area does have muscles, too, and these play an additional role. The lower lip has an acoustical damping effect on the reed, which plays a role in response, tone quality, and volume. Pulling the muscles around the chin downward around its bony structure (this is independent of jaw movement!) firms the lip slightly, reducing the damping. Allowing the muscles to relax softens the lip, increasing the damping. To take an oversimplified view of one aspect of this, we could say generally that the smaller clarinet requires a slightly firmer lip (and thus less damping) to accommodate its higher frequencies (pitches), while the larger saxophone needs less firmness (more damping) to accommodate its lower ones. Note that firmness of the lower lip should not be confused with overall embouchure “tightness.”

    Understanding better the anatomical and acoustical aspects of the “chin” (and, of course, the skeletal and muscular systems that combine there) lead to clearer, more accurate teaching and better single reed playing.

    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Clarinet and saxophone embouchures and the “chin”Continue

  • Musicianship

    Subdivision, long notes, and slowing the tempo

    ByBret Pimentel May 13, 2015March 14, 2017

    As my students get better at reading more complicated rhythms, often it is the “easy” notes that emerge as the ones still lacking in precision: the longer note values and the rests. It’s not uncommon for my university students to play intricate sixteenth-note rhythms with accuracy and confidence, but play whole notes that are too short by a significant fraction.

    Try this: use your thumb and index finger to indicate a distance of about an inch (or, if you live in a country with saner units of measure, do a centimeter). How sure are you of your estimate? Now try one foot (or maybe 30 centimeters), then one yard (or one meter). How sure are you of those estimates? Probably less so. Look into the distance and see if you can guess at a point that is a mile (or kilometer) away. At distances this large, it starts to feel more like just guessing. But if you are reasonably confident of your smaller measurements, you can use them to derive the larger ones: measure out 12 of your guesstimated inches, and you can be more confident that you are in the ballpark of a foot.

    Note values are the same way: it’s much easier to place notes that have less “distance” (time) between them. This is why subdividing is key to playing longer notes (or rests) accurately. Don’t start a whole note, wait, and end the note when you suppose enough time has passed; instead, mentally use smaller notes to measure out the longer ones. For example:

    subdivision

    Subdivision is also particularly useful for slowing down tempos smoothly and gracefully. When the “large” beats need to get farther apart, it’s not easy to do this gradually and evenly. Smaller beat subdivisions are much easier to manipulate.

    Subdivision takes some concentration at first, but can become somewhat automatic with practice. Master this technique for greater precision and control of tempo.

    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Subdivision, long notes, and slowing the tempoContinue

  • Musicianship

    “Next” steps in preparing repertoire

    ByBret Pimentel May 2, 2015March 14, 2017

    I think many aspiring musicians pass through a phase in their development where they have “learned” fingerings, music reading skills, and other fundamentals at a basic degree of mastery, and turn their attention to developing sufficiently fluent technique (mostly finger technique) to tackle the instrument’s standard literature. Once they acquire that fluency and tackle that repertoire, they will begin to deal with the nuances of interpretation.

    Whether this is the best way to do things is a subject for another post (or book), but the reality is that a lot of advancing music students, including many of my university students, are at a point where they are very focused on playing notes in time in tempo, and when they achieve that level with an étude or repertoire piece, sometimes they don’t have a clear idea of what else needs to be done to bring the assignment to a performance level.

    Photo, S. Parker
    Photo, S. Parker

    If you or your students find yourself in that holding pattern, here are just a few ideas of what to “add” to your technical preparation:

    • Are you following all the composer’s marked articulations? dynamics? tempo changes?
    • In the places between the dynamic markings, are you giving the phrases appropriate shaping?
    • Is each note in tune? Does each note have a characteristic, pleasing, and consistent tone? Does each note respond precisely when and how you intend it to?
    • Have you familiarized yourself with all of the composer’s textual indications, and translated them if necessary? Are you making them audible?
    • Are you using vibrato (if applicable) in a purposeful and expressive way?
    • Are you taking a purposeful approach to performance practice? For example, are you using historically-informed approaches to ornamentation, dynamics, tempo, articulation, etc.? Or, alternatively, have you made a conscious and well-informed decision to break from these?
    • Have you studied live performances and recordings of this work by the finest musicians, compared their interpretations, and made careful choices about which ideas to incorporate or adapt into your own performance?
    • Have you thoroughly studied the full score, and do you understand how your part fits into the whole?
    • Do you have opinions about the formal structure, and are you using those to shape your overall interpretation?

    Those are just a few, but probably enough to keep most of us busy for a lifetime of study. Feel free to add some more in the comments.

    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More “Next” steps in preparing repertoireContinue

  • Favorite blog posts

    Favorite blog posts, April 2015

    ByBret Pimentel April 30, 2015January 1, 2018

    Enjoy:

    • Oboist Patty Mitchell wrote so many good posts this month that I just couldn’t decide, so here’s one about getting over reed stress, one about not making excuses, and one about half-hole technique.
    • Saxophonist Bill Plake discusses a problem with teaching and learning music.
    • Clarinetist Sandy Herrera dares to set the metronome aside, sometimes.
    • Barry Stees suggests a do-it-yourself fix for the problematic low D on bassoon.
    • Clarinetist Rachel Yoder describes a system for quantifying practicing progress.
    • William Short shares some lesser-known bassoon high note fingerings (with very attractive diagrams).
    • “Vintage Clarinet Doctor” Jeremy Soule explains the difference between a re-pad and an overhaul.
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Favorite blog posts, April 2015Continue

  • Musicianship

    Sparking creative inspiration

    ByBret Pimentel April 16, 2015July 20, 2022

    It’s tempting sometimes to see my students as either left-brained or right-brained players—either the precise, technically-oriented type or the creative, intuitive type. The reality, of course, is that they are all some of each, but may have greater strengths in one area or the other. And good musicians need both.

    Trying to get the more technically-inclined to play with imagination and spontaneity can be frustrating for student and teacher alike. And the more intuitive types sometimes need a little organization to make sure their creativity is focused into a cohesive musical statement. Here is a very simple technique that I use with “both” kinds of students to encourage creative exploration without wandering too far afield.

    photo, Bernat Casero
    photo, Bernat Casero

    First I select a brief passage and ask the student to imagine that it is part of the soundtrack to a movie, and start feeding them genres to try out: Can you play it like it’s part of a swashbuckling action-adventure movie? a slapstick comedy? a steamy love story? a tense courtroom drama? For the student who is tentative about playing imaginatively, this is a fairly simple, non-threatening way to experiment with some intuitive musical decisions. For a student whose flights of fancy need a little direction, this technique provides just enough discipline without suppressing creativity.

    The next step is to ask the student to pick a few favorite genres on their own, or even specific movies, and let them explore the passage within those frameworks. Some students, the more technically-inclined in particular, seem a little embarrassed about sharing even that much of their creative process aloud, so I don’t push them to do so as long as they can use it to create a few interpretations that are convincingly distinct. The important thing is that they are discovering the ability to generate ideas and apply them to the music.

    An additional step is to move beyond movie genres to something a little more esoteric. I have had success with having students play different colors (purple? yellow? black? fuchsia?), different moods or emotions (love? hate? joy? paranoia?), or different “instruments” (can you sound like a trumpet? a cello? an operatic soprano? a snare drum?). Sometimes I use this approach myself to tackle particularly tricky interpretive questions, like how to handle repeated sections that I want to sound just different enough on the second time through: maybe the first time royal blue, and the second time more of a navy blue.

    Advanced musical interpretation can be much richer and more complex, but starting out with this technique seems to help many of my students get started, by opening up an intuitive path for some students and providing some useful creative boundaries for others.

    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Sparking creative inspirationContinue

  • Career

    Handout: Blogging to build your woodwind career

    ByBret Pimentel April 3, 2015March 14, 2017

    I gave a presentation at last week’s Mid-South Flute Festival on blogging as a means for enhancing a performing/teaching career. The handout says “flute” on it, but I think the advice really is pretty generally applicable.

    Blogging to Build Your Flute Career (PDF)

    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Handout: Blogging to build your woodwind careerContinue

  • Fun

    Introducing ReedCast™: scientific woodwind reed quality forecasting

    ByBret Pimentel April 1, 2015April 1, 2017

    I’m pleased to announce a new tool available on this site. Woodwind players know that the way a reed plays is subject to factors like elevation, temperature, humidity, and atmospheric pressure. There’s never a guarantee that a reed will play the same way today as it did yesterday. While break-in methods or storage systems may help mitigate some of this, being forearmed with as much information as possible is key to consistent reed performance.

    I have spent the past few months compiling and studying as much research as I could gather about environmental factors’ effects on woodwind reeds, and developing an algorithm to process this information into reed quality “forecasts.” It’s not perfect, of course, but so far I have found it to do a surprisingly satisfactory job.

    So, I built a web application, ReedCast™, around it. It is rough around the edges but pretty simple to use: you select your instrument (oboe/EH, clarinet, bassoon, saxophone) and your location. ReedCast™ uses your location to retrieve elevation and current weather conditions. Then you press the “Go!” button, and ReedCast™ does its thing.

    Go try it out! If you are interested, you can also check out the science behind the forecasting algorithm (warning: technical, with math).

    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Introducing ReedCast™: scientific woodwind reed quality forecastingContinue

  • Favorite blog posts

    Favorite blog posts, March 2015

    ByBret Pimentel March 31, 2015January 1, 2018

    Fine woodwind bloggery from the past month:

    • Mark Catoe shares a nicely-organized sequence for teaching beginning saxophonists the major scales.
    • Cate Hummel provides a checklist for improving third-octave playing on the flute.
    • Oboist Jennet Ingle ponders upon the process of changing playing habits, and works in some important reed concepts, too.
    • Bassoonist Christin Schillinger gives some down-to-earth advice on dealing with performance anxiety.
    • Trent Jacobs shares some bassoon “extended low register” (multiphonic) fingerings.

    That wraps up the first quarter of 2015 with no clarinet posts featured yet. Clarinet bloggers, let me know you’re out there. Also, all of this month’s featured bloggers are repeats, some several times over. If you have a woodwind blog that you think I may not be following yet, send me a link!

    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Favorite blog posts, March 2015Continue

Page navigation

Previous PagePrevious 1 … 43 44 45 46 47 … 87 Next PageNext

My book: Woodwind Basics

Woodwind Basics, by Bret Pimentel

Show appreciation




Tell Google you trust this site

Bret on YouTube

More…

Bret on TikTok

Posts by instrument

  • Bassoon
  • Clarinet
  • Flute
  • Oboe
  • Saxophone
  • Wind controller
  • Woodwind doubling
  • Woodwinds with electronics
  • World woodwinds

Posts by category

  • Announcements and news
  • Career
  • Education
  • Favorite blog posts
  • Fun
  • Musicianship
  • Product reviews
  • Web reviews
  • Woodwind playing and pedagogy

Posts by tag

  • practicing
  • equipment
  • jazz
  • reeds
  • recital
  • embouchure
  • books
  • fingering selection
  • musicals
  • Fingering Diagram Builder

Get posts by email

© 2026 Bret Pimentel, woodwinds

Scroll to top
  • About
    • Cookie Policy
  • Resources and tools
    • Woodwind Doubling in Musicals
    • Fingering Diagram Builder
    • Random Note Picker
    • Note Image Generator
    • More…
  • Lessons
  • Shop