What I listen for in scholarship auditions

ByBret Pimentel

It’s scholarship audition season again, which means I get to meet and listen to some very nervous high school seniors (and community college sophomores).

My university is a small regional one, so our audition process probably isn’t as intense as some of the big name-brand music schools. If you’re preparing for an audition, you should definitely check in with that school to see what they expect, but here’s what I usually hear auditionees play, and what I’m thinking while I listen.

Scales

I’ll likely ask to hear major scales in two or three keys, and maybe a chromatic scale as well. Generally top scholarship audition winners are ready to play all twelve, but if a prospective student only knows some of them then those are the ones I want to hear. They should be played in as many octaves as are practical for the instrument (or full range!). I don’t care much whether they are tongued, slurred, in some particular rhythm, etc. I do care that they are played evenly and with control, even if that means they are on the slow side. Fast and sloppy does not earn any scholarship dollars.

What I’m ultimately looking for is evidence of a disciplined, methodical approach to learning the instrument and its fingerings, throughout the instrument’s standard range. A student who has laid this groundwork probably has the dedication and practicing-related skills to succeed in college-level music studies.

Prepared repertoire

I prefer to hear something somewhat technical/notey plus something slower and more lyrical. It doesn’t matter to me whether it’s, say, two different etudes, or one repertoire piece that has elements of both.

In the more technical passage I’m interested in seeing evidence of ability to deal with lots of musical information at once: notes, articulations, alternate fingerings, etc. What this really boils down to is preparation—getting a relatively complicated piece into muscle memory. Again, I’m not especially concerned that the tempo be fast; if the student plays something polished and poised at a slower tempo then I know they will be capable of working the tempo up later.

For the more lyrical excerpt, I’m listening more specifically for musical thinking. Can the student join notes together into phrases, in at least a basic way? Can they execute dynamic changes and contrasts in a way that feels integral to the melodic line? Can they demonstrate fine control and beauty of tone?

Students who have had prior private lessons, or at least some good direction from a school band director, typically show up with etudes and/or repertoire from the instrument’s standard canon. That isn’t strictly necessary for purposes of evaluating students’ potential, but it does show that they have some idea of what they are getting into. Pop tunes or parts from their school concert band or marching band aren’t really appropriate, but if that’s all a student has then that’s what I’ll listen to. (I usually follow up with some questions to make sure they are clear about the nature of the degree program.)

Sight reading

Lots of auditioning students seem to regard sight reading as some kind of trap, like I’m trying to trick them into playing wrong notes so I can deny them a scholarship. But what I’m really interested in is seeing what approach they take to something new: are they able to count out rhythms, follow key signatures, and make some educated guesses about interpretation? Or do they seem to depend on someone else to teach them the rhythms by rote and remind them each time they play a wrong pitch? I have occasionally had students who are very good at executing something learned by rote or by ear—and these are valuable skills—but I need to verify their ability to read music. Substandard reading isn’t necessarily a dealbreaker if they show strong abilities in other areas, but I (and they) need to know what they are up against.

Habits and presentation

I always ask auditioning students about their practice habits, since the number of weekly practice hours required for college-level success can be surprising and overwhelming to incoming students. This isn’t really about me awarding scholarship money for being a good practicer—it’s about making sure the student is clear about expectations and shows willingness and enthusiasm for some hard work.

When I listen to an audition I’m acutely aware that this person is potentially someone I will spend many one-on-one hours with over the next several years, and I would like for that to be a pleasant experience. Factors like manners, dress and grooming, and communication skills aren’t part of what I am formally evaluating, but they do hint at what the student would be like to work with. I don’t have specific protocols or dress codes I expect them to adhere to, but I’m looking for some clues that they take the audition process seriously and want to lay groundwork for a positive student-teacher relationship.

I hope that helps. Good luck!

Similar Posts

  • Creativity, hard work, and beginning jazz improvisation

    ByBret Pimentel

    I occasionally teach a university course in jazz improvisation, geared toward beginning improvisers. Sometimes I think prospective students are afraid to sign up because they don’t consider themselves already to be musically creative. On the other hand, I have some students enroll in the class with unrealistic expectations about the results, thinking that they will learn all the tricks and secrets and be ready for some fantasy gig.

    It doesn’t make sense to avoid taking French 101 because “I don’t speak any French”—you’re missing the point of an introductory course. But it also isn’t likely that by the end of the semester you’ll be ready to wow everyone at the smartest dinner parties in Paris.

    Photo, alphadesigner
    Photo, alphadesigner

    The good-news/bad-news is that most of what happens in a beginning improvisation class doesn’t feel creative or spontaneous at all. In my course, we do a lot of drilling of scales, arpeggios, patterns, and “licks,” and then trying to execute them successfully in a pre-planned way over a set of chord changes. The same happens in your first-semester French class: you memorize some basic phrases by rote, and try to use them in the right order in very structured “conversations.” At some point you get some very restricted freedom: you have to say what color le chat is, but you get to pick if he is noir or blanc. Similarly, in my class you might get to decide which of your two memorized “two-five-one” licks to use over the first four bars of the bridge, or whether to start that digital pattern on the root of the chord or the fifth, but that’s about it. Limited options don’t mean you aren’t really improvising (or speaking French), it just means you don’t have a lot of vocabulary to work with yet.

    I know that this rubs some improvisers the wrong way: I shouldn’t be regurgitating pre-packaged licks! I should be developing my own “thing!” For those people, I suggest you read a biography of any great improvising musician and find out what they did in the early stages of developing their thing. Or just try speaking some French: no need for grammar study or vocabulary lists! Do your thing!

    For those who consider themselves creativity-deficient: you can learn to improvise in a systematic way—it’s not something you’re born with (or without). I’ll teach you some existing vocabulary and some techniques for making your own, and then you can start putting them together in ways that make sense to you. You’re being creative!

    For those hoping to learn some “tricks:” the only useful trick I can teach you is to take the techniques from the class and hit the practice rooms. There aren’t any shortcuts to improvising well. It will require hard work over the course of many years. But the process can be a lot of fun!

  • Playing professional whole notes

    ByBret Pimentel

    I have spent many hours of my life absorbed in difficult études and repertoire. Challenging music pushes the limits of my abilities.

    But when I actually get hired to play music, it’s almost never anything that complicated. Many of my workaday gigs are very easy—on paper.

    One part of my career is playing with a nearby symphony. The repertoire occasionally has a few moments in it that demand my fleetest technique. But, as a wind player, I spend much more of the concert counting rests and waiting to play another handful of whole notes.

    I recently played in a recording session for a local band’s new album. I played a total of one note. I played it a bunch of times, but it was just the one long note, over and over.

    A beginner could play one note. So why hire a professional?

    The notes—fast or slow, easy or hard—need to be beautiful, balanced, in tune, started precisely, ended precisely, shaped appropriately, and stylistically appropriate.

    I’ve never been hired to play études, and almost never to play classical solo repertoire, but studying those has helped me develop the control and skill to play the whole notes just right, and that’s what gets me hired.

  • Using sticky notes to focus my performance thinking

    ByBret Pimentel

    I might put in weeks or months preparing for a high-pressure performance. The groundwork is done—I have made the technical and interpretive decisions, drilled the difficult spots, and otherwise planned and prepared every aspect of my playing.

    But all of that can fall apart pretty quickly if my head isn’t in the right place. Nerves, stress, and distractions can make one small error snowball into an unfocused, sloppy performance.

    One of my favorite tricks to help avoid this is to plan my thinking. As I do the final preparations for my performance, I often pick out two or three things I would like to focus on as I begin each piece or movement. These might be important technical details (“make sure embouchure is stable before playing the first note”), more general advice (“keep breath support strong through the ends of phrases”), or interpretive thoughts (“light and playful”).

    I write these two or three things (no more) on a sticky note, and place it at the beginning of the piece or movement. If the reminders seem especially crucial, I might put the sticky note over the first few measures of music, so I can’t start playing until I have physically moved it out of the way.

    This small preparation helps ensure that as I begin to play, I’m thinking about the things that are most important to the success of the performance, rather than reacting to distractions.

  • Technical limits

    ByBret Pimentel

    If I try to play too softly, sometimes my notes don’t respond as I would like. If I try to play too loudly, sometimes my tone or intonation suffer. I have similar limitations when it comes to things like finger or tongue speed, tone color or pitch flexibility, and more.

    The way I deal with these limits is very different depending on whether I’m performing or practicing.

    If I’m performing, I want to stay just within my limits. I want every note to be predictable and reliable. I want to take advantage of every bit of my dynamic range, but no more. I want to make wise, deliberate, professional-quality choices.

    If I’m practicing, I want to explore those limits. Push those limits. Live just beyond those limits. It’s important to do this for couple of reasons. First, if I don’t go past those limits, I won’t know where the limits are for my upcoming performance. Second, if I’m too afraid to go past the limits in the practice room, I’ll never expand them. And if something goes wrong—a note cracks or fails to speak or is out of tune—that’s okay, it’s just practice.

    Find your limits, know them well, and, in your practice space, break them.

  • Priorities and patience

    ByBret Pimentel

    Student: I really just want to improve my sound.

    Beautiful tone is a nice goal, but it’s subjective, and it’s inextricable from less-sexy pursuits like consistent tone, solid intonation, and reliable response. Let’s expand your focus to your overall tone production and make sure you do lots of listening to the great players. Then you’ll be equipped to play beautiful ideas, not just beautiful notes. Read More “Priorities and patience”

  • Jazz education and the “ya gotta listen” cop-out

    ByBret Pimentel

    Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases, at no cost to you.

    It’s an article of faith among jazz musicians and educators that listening to jazz is crucial to learning to play jazz. This seems obviously true to me about jazz and about any style of music.

    (Doubtless one of the reasons the jazz-initiated like to bang this drum, so to speak, is because most of Western music education is so notation-focused. The “classical” tradition has developed hand-in-hand with a notation system that does a pretty good—not perfect—job of breaking down classical music sounds into visual symbols. That system, unsurprisingly, works less well for non-classical styles like jazz. But jazz music is still often expressed in classical-type notation, with some kind of caveat, explicit or otherwise, that the player must apply some significant additional stylistic know-how that will override the usual meanings of some of the notation.)

    But one thing classical music educators have done in their few hundred extra years is codify and explain many (not all, and not all well, and not all in agreement) of their stylistic and interpretive ideas. In jazz education, too often important details get waved away with a “ya gotta listen.”

    “Ya gotta listen” to classical music to play it well, too. But there’s also more clear, thoughtful pedagogy available to help you know what to listen for, and how to apply it.

    If you are a jazz educator and find yourself dodging questions or glossing over concepts with a “ya gotta listen,” can you add something to the picture? Try saying instead, “Ya gotta listen to how Cannonball Adderley ‘lays back’ in this particular phrase. He plays some notes later than expected in a way that sounds good. Listen a few times to see which notes, and how late.” Or: “Ya gotta listen to how Freddie Hubbard plays ‘outside’ over this turnaround. Can you figure out which scale he is drawing from? Where exactly does he resolve back to playing ‘inside?'”

    How long would it realistically take for an unguided young musician to listen to jazz until they had fully absorbed the nuances? I used to feel pretty overwhelmed and hopeless when teachers three times my age with thousands of well-worn records told me I wouldn’t sound better until I had really listened. Luckily I had others who were willing and able to accelerate and focus my learning by giving some direction and context to my listening.

    If you find that you have difficulty explaining some of the things you want your students to listen for, there are resources available to help you and them boil things down to understandable concepts. For improvisational theory, you might try free YouTube videos (or additional paid content) from teacher/players like Chad Lefkowitz-Brown or Aimee Nolte. For style, consider books like those by Caleb Chapman and Jeff Coffin or Ray Smith.

    And yes, ya gotta listen.

One Comment

  1. Hi,Brett! This is a great article! Organized, descriptive and specific, it’s a well-thought out and well-presented guide for prospective students. I think it’s also helpful that you give the reasons why you are looking out for certain elements and skills. In addition, I appreciate that you bring into focus signs of practice habits, critical thinking, professionalism, and other traits that have so much influence on our success in life.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments that take a negative or confrontational tone are subject to email and name verification before being approved. In other words: no anonymous trolls allowed—take responsibility for your words.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.