Skip to content
Bret Pimentel, woodwinds

Bret Pimentel, woodwinds

  • AboutExpand
    • Cookie Policy
  • Resources and toolsExpand
    • Woodwind Doubling in Musicals
    • Fingering Diagram Builder
    • Random Note Picker
    • Note Image Generator
    • More…
  • Lessons
  • Shop
Email YouTube TikTok Facebook Instagram Amazon RSS
Bret Pimentel, woodwinds
Bret Pimentel, woodwinds
  • Woodwind playing and pedagogy

    Practice technique: anchoring

    ByBret Pimentel April 29, 2014March 14, 2017

    This is a technique I recommend often to students who are struggling with notey passages. I can’t remember where I picked it up, or whether “anchoring” is my own name for it or someone else’s. No doubt credit for this belongs to somebody smarter than I.

    The problem that I sometimes see with my students (and, okay, occasionally with myself) is that fast passages are uneven and panicky. The student sees a long string of notes and frantically dives in, to the detriment of meter and tempo, and with notes accidentally omitted or added.

    Let’s consider this excerpt:

    from Debussy Première rhapsodie
    from Debussy Première rhapsodie (clarinet)

    It’s a challenging passage—shifting harmony, intervallic motion, awkward fingerings. This is a recipe for frustration using the old standby method of playing slowly with the metronome and gradually increasing the tempo. Instead, let’s set the metronome aside for a few minutes, and play the passage in an intentionally uneven way:

    with added tenuto-accent-fermata
    with added tenuto-accent-fermatas

    Put lots of weight on the metric pulses (the “anchor” notes): play them long, loud, and with emphasis. Hold each fermata long enough to scope out the next four notes, then move through them as quickly as you accurately can, coming to rest again on the next fermata. Repeat the passage in this way as many times as you can stand.

    Here’s what this accomplishes:

    • It makes you think about logical groups of notes, rather than trying either to process each note individually or to deal with the whole phrase as an overwhelming sea of notes. It’s the sweet spot between too much mental chatter and too little focus.
    • It encourages effective phrasing by treating the notes as leading toward downbeats.
    • It trains your ears to hear the notes in fours (at least in this 2/4 passage—try threes instead if the situation calls for it). Now as you return to playing the passage evenly, you are more likely to notice if you are omitting or adding notes.

    To transition from this technique into a more performable approach, gradually decrease the duration of the fermatas and the weight of the accents, while continuing to mentally emphasize the anchor notes and place them carefully in tempo (time to get the metronome back out). Also try spacing the anchors farther apart as an intermediate step—one at the beginning of each measure, for example, or every few measures as appropriate.

    Practice smart!

    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Practice technique: anchoringContinue

  • Woodwind playing and pedagogy

    Novelty and solo multiple-woodwind performance

    ByBret Pimentel April 21, 2014July 20, 2022

    For a decade now, virtually every solo recital I have played has involved multiple woodwind instruments. I enjoy the variety and the challenge, and audiences are always duly appreciative and complimentary.

    However, I do wonder sometimes about the novelty aspect of using multiple woodwind instruments in solo “classical” performance. Often well-intentioned (and much-appreciated!) audience members will tell me something like, “It’s so amazing that you can play all those instruments!” That’s nice of them, but would they say something similar at a single-instrument recital? “It’s so amazing that you can play that instrument.”

    Photo, José Camba
    Photo, José Camba

    I’ve leveraged the variety a couple of times recently to do composer-themed recitals, one of music by Debussy and one of music by Telemann. On a single instrument, I would mostly shy away from playing an hour of music by a single composer. Such a thing could be done, but to make it a real success would require both a very engaging performer and an appropriate audience: for listeners with a casual appreciation of classical music, an hour of Bach flute sonatas or an hour of Brahms clarinet sonatas could be a bit of a drag. My recent Telemann sonata included music performed on six different solo instruments, two of them relatively rarely-heard (recorder and EWI), and that seemed to be enough to keep the audience on board.

    But were they on board purely because of the composer’s and performers’ art, or was it the feat of instrumental derring-do that held their interest? Of course I would like for my performances to stand on their own, regardless of how many or how few instruments I use, but it’s hard to tell when the audience is distracted by the parade of shiny objects. I’m not bothered by having a gimmick per se, but I don’t want it to be the only thing holding the performance together.

    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Novelty and solo multiple-woodwind performanceContinue

  • Musicianship

    Memorization and practicing

    ByBret Pimentel April 3, 2014January 17, 2019

    I think memorization is a useful practice technique, even if you don’t intend to perform “from memory.” Memorization of music has several facets:

    • Aural memory: I should be able to sing the music (at least in my mind) from beginning to end with confidence and accuracy.
    • Content/visual/analytical memory: I should be able to more or less transcribe or describe the music from memory. This might include being able to picture the printed music, being able to describe it in reasonably specific terms (“then there’s a fast run up a C minor scale, ending on a long high F with a fermata”), and/or being able to discuss the formal and phrase structures. (I don’t think you necessarily need to be able to think in terms of formal classical music theory, as long as you have some kind of vocabulary for talking about music.)
    • Physical/muscle memory: If I have practiced in a thorough, detailed way, I should be able to more or less play on “autopilot.” I don’t want to perform in a disengaged way, but I do want to be able to focus my mind on non-technical things.
    Photo, Rick Shinozaki
    Edmund Welles bass clarinet quartet (L to R: Cornelius Boots, Jonathan Russell, Aaron Novik, Jeff Anderle). Photo, Rick Shinozaki

    The benefits of memorization, even for not-strictly-from-memory performance, include:

    • Confidence born from deep mastery of the music.
    • The ability to handle minor on-stage crises, like a missed page turn or a sudden distraction, with ease and grace.
    • Internalization of the music in such a way that interpretation becomes natural, expressive, and personal.
    • Freedom from “reading” issues. Sometimes musical passages are made difficult by visual factors, like hard-to-read notation, a personal reading difficulty (such as dyslexia or poor eyesight, perhaps), or something that simply doesn’t “click” visually for the reader. If looking at the page is causing problems, then just don’t look.
    • Ability to take a step back from the page, literally and figuratively, which encourages greater connection with collaborators and audiences.

    If you are already practicing in a thorough and deliberate way, you are probably well on your way to memorization already without any extra effort. Use good practice techniques and memorization together to support better preparation and performance.

    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Memorization and practicingContinue

  • Fun

    Report: NNFA Conference, Southeastern Region, 2014

    ByBret Pimentel April 1, 2014January 3, 2018

    I’m back from the outstanding NNFA regional conference, where I spent the week rubbing shoulders (or should I say noses?) with over 700 very fine musicians from the Southeastern US.

    I gave a brief presentation on my Fingering Diagram Builder and its potential applications to the instrument’s pedagogy. I think that’s an interesting problem, considering, well, you know, and I fielded some questions on the topic and got some excellent input.

    Photo, Pierre-Alain Dorange
    Photo, Pierre-Alain Dorange

    But mostly I was there to learn, and learn I did. I attended workshops on vibrato, Baroque ornamentation, nasal hygiene, and building a private studio. I also audited several masterclasses, and, of course, attended fabulous evening concerts. Thursday was “jazz night” at a downtown club, and I worked up the nerve to take a few choruses on “Donna Lee” during the open jam portion. Of course, I usually play jazz on saxophone, so this was definitely outside my comfort zone!

    The vendor exhibits were a conference hotspot, as usual, and I must have tried several dozen instruments. The usual makers and retailers were there, but I was also very surprised to see Conn-Selmer; they are apparently entering the market in a big way, and held a fancy reception to celebrate their new line. I tried a few and I think they have a solid intermediate-level “horn” which should do pretty well if they price it reasonably.

    I hadn’t planned to buy an instrument, but I fell in love with this model from Trophy and ended up bringing it home. The one pictured has a red finish, but as I am fairly conservative about my instruments’ appearance I picked out a classy purple. I find that the purple has an appealing depth of tone but doesn’t lose anything in terms of response.

    I hope to see some of you at the national conference next year in Des Moines. Last year’s national had attendance of almost 4,000 and some really incredible concert headliners. Join the National Nose Flute Association

    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Report: NNFA Conference, Southeastern Region, 2014Continue

  • Favorite blog posts

    Favorite blog posts, March 2014

    ByBret Pimentel March 31, 2014January 1, 2018

    Recommended reading from the woodwind blogs in March:

    • “Komuso Lady” at A Shakuhachi Journey blogs about tsu meri difficulties. Even for players of “modern” Western woodwinds, there are good thoughts here on getting to know your instrument and its tendencies intimately.
    • Betsy Sturdevant offers some commentary and tips on playing bassoon 1 on the Firebird Suite.
    • Patty Mitchell shares some reed advice for oboe students.
    • At the “MetOrchestraMusicians” blog, a nice infographic about reeds. (Hat-tip to Patty Mitchell for this one.)
    • Saxophonist Timothy Owen explains his reed preparation and finishing process.
    • Clarinetist Adam Berkowitz offers some insightful responses and expansions to my recent blog post about uncompensated gigs.
    • Saxophonist Bill Plake keeps a level head about equipment (suitable for players of all instruments).
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Favorite blog posts, March 2014Continue

  • Musicianship

    Answering equipment questions

    ByBret Pimentel March 24, 2014March 15, 2017

    I attended a small jazz festival a number of years ago, which included student workshops with some of the festival’s headline artists. Unsurprisingly, some of the first questions asked in these workshops were about the artists’ equipment choices.

    The responses varied widely. A few of the artists were excited to talk about their instruments, mouthpieces, and so forth, and to offer glowing testimonials.

    Others responded less enthusiastically. One of the festival’s biggest-name artists mocked a student for even asking the question. The student slumped down into his seat as one of his idols berated him in front of everyone.

    But I was especially impressed by one artist in particular, whose equipment choices are well-known and widely-imitated. “Well, I use _____, _____, and _____,” he explained, “but there are a lot of really good options out there, and what works for me doesn’t work for everybody. Plus, you should know that lots of music stores sell equipment with this brand name, but it’s not really the same product anymore as the one I bought decades ago.” Then he moved onto another question.

    Photo, Laurie Samet
    Photo, Laurie Samet

    I thought this was a very effective, responsible, and respectful way to answer the question: he didn’t make the student feel bad for asking, and he didn’t encourage the student to buy something specific that might not really be a fit. I also admired the brevity and matter-of-factness of his answer—it cast the question as what it ought to be: a curiosity, rather than something of great importance.

    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Answering equipment questionsContinue

  • Career

    Death from exposure

    ByBret Pimentel March 20, 2014March 15, 2017

    Working musicians, especially those trying to launch their careers or take them to the next level, are all too familiar with the idea of playing for “exposure”—in other words, playing gigs for free with the idea that maybe it will somehow lead to paying gigs.

    Playing for free is one thing; there’s no reason you can’t do a favor for a friend, or show up at a jam session for fun and/or practice. But it’s more insidious when your unpaid labor is fueling somebody else’s profits. This seems to be a phenomenon that particularly affects creative types: the same people who want your band to play at their event for “exposure” or “experience” are no doubt paying the waitstaff, stage crew, or what-have-you, because people in those jobs simply don’t work for free.

    Photo, Mark Robinson
    Photo, Mark Robinson

    The fallacy here is that the prospective employer is offering you exposure and experience and networking instead of money, as if the alternative were gigs that paid money but didn’t offer those things. That simply isn’t the case: you get all those benefits from paid gigs, too, plus you get to pay your rent that month. Read More “Death from exposure”

    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Death from exposureContinue

  • Woodwind playing and pedagogy

    Improvisation and doubling

    ByBret Pimentel March 13, 2014March 15, 2017

    An important factor in improvising fluently (such as in a jazz context) is a collection of vocabulary. Broadly defined, this could include rote-memorized “licks” plus all kinds of other material: scale- or arpeggio-oriented patterns, for example. With improvisation, you don’t have the luxury of practicing your solo note-for-note; instead you have to develop a large pool of available material, and learn it so well that you can mix and match it on the fly.

    Photo, fantail media
    Photo, fantail media

    If you double on multiple instruments, the vocabulary pool isn’t really portable. You can bring your improvisational ideas with you from instrument to instrument, but you won’t be able to execute them smoothly unless you have put in the practice hours on each instrument separately. If you are doubling, say, saxophone and flute, you might find that the fingerings are similar enough that you can make a few things work, but it’s too easy to paint yourself into a corner, or to catch yourself using “close enough” fingerings that really aren’t, or to play with unsatisfactory tone or intonation. To do it right, and have the colors of multiple instrumental voices available to you as an improviser, treat each instrument like it’s your only one.

    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Improvisation and doublingContinue

  • Woodwind playing and pedagogy

    Misconceptions about saxophone-to-clarinet doubling

    ByBret Pimentel March 8, 2014January 2, 2018

    I saw a blog post recently by a saxophonist who had been called upon to play some clarinet for a big band jazz gig. The post was full of common frustrations that saxophonists who are casual clarinet doublers face in that situation. I want to respond to some of the ideas in that post, but since it’s not my object to embarrass anyone I’m not going to name the saxophonist or link to the blog post. Also, the “quotes” I’m using here are actually paraphrases, but I believe they capture the saxophonist’s intended meaning.

    The clarinet is evil! And it sounds like a dying animal.

    I understand this is said in jest, but fear and/or contempt are not good starting points for approaching woodwind doubles. Either focus your energies on instruments you are motivated to play, or have an open mind. As with most things, you probably hate and fear the clarinet because you haven’t taken the time and effort to get to know it.

    photo, APMus
    photo, APMus

    I’m actually pretty good at the bass clarinet, though.

    I doubt it! There are plenty of saxophonists who claim they can play the bass clarinet but not the B-flat clarinet. In many, many of those cases, what the saxophonists mean is that they can use a very saxophoney approach to playing the bass clarinet—a too-low voicing, a too-horizontal mouthpiece angle, etc.—and make some kind of sound, whereas the smaller B-flat simply won’t cooperate at all with these bad techniques. Truly good bass clarinetists, however, produce a more characteristic sound because they play the instrument like what it is: a member of the clarinet family.

    I dug up a fingering chart so I could do some practicing for my gig. Those pinky fingerings just don’t make any sense, plus you have to read a bunch of ledger lines.

    Saxophonists are spoiled by the instrument’s relatively small “standard” range and relatively simplistic fingering scheme. But I think a reasonable argument could be made that the clarinet’s system of alternate “pinky” fingerings is tidier and more flexible than the saxophone’s clunky rollers. Break out the Klosé book and learn to do it right. Read More “Misconceptions about saxophone-to-clarinet doubling”

    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Misconceptions about saxophone-to-clarinet doublingContinue

  • Favorite blog posts

    Favorite blog posts, February 2014

    ByBret Pimentel March 1, 2014July 21, 2022

    Here are some of my picks for some excellent woodwind-related blog posts from last month.

    • Bass clarinetist Michael Lowenstern gives excellent advice on some topics (such as “biting”) that I think are not often taught well.
    • Mark Catoe gives a workshop on teaching beginning clarinetists to cross the break. (Those are some mighty handsome fingering diagrams.)
    • Chris Dunning takes us on a historical video tour of the saxophone in jazz [update: link dead].
    • Clarinetist Adam Berkowitz manages the logistical details of a performance. Also: two habits worth having.
    • Jennet Ingle bemoans the oboe’s caprices. “It’s not that playing the oboe is physically more difficult than any other instrument, it’s that the oboe doesn’t want you to get it.”
    • Bassoonist Betsy Sturdevant chases the elusive high F.
    • Oboist Patty Mitchell explains what it means to “know” a piece of music.
    • Trent Jacobs gives a primer on amplifiers for woodwind players interested in going electric.
    • Over at Music Collective, flutist Jessica Dunnavant discovers life beyond the university-teaching-job search.
    • Timothy Owen offers some observations and advice on playing multiple sizes of saxophone.
    • Clarinetist Heather Roche gives composers some insights on glissandi and air sounds, with extensive audio clips.
    • Vanessa Breault Mulvey of the “Flying Flutistas” avoids “muscling up” on the flute. Also on the trapeze. Really [update: link dead].
    • Cooper Wright gives his oboe a good cleaning.
    • Woodwind player Ted Nash tells the story of how he nearly got adopted by Quincy Jones. “Part II to follow,” he promises.
    • Meri Dolevski-Lewis gives some good common-sense tips to those working with a pianist for the first time.

    Enjoy!

    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Favorite blog posts, February 2014Continue

Page navigation

Previous PagePrevious 1 … 48 49 50 51 52 … 86 Next PageNext

My book: Woodwind Basics

Woodwind Basics, by Bret Pimentel

Show appreciation




Bret on YouTube

More…

Posts by instrument

  • Bassoon
  • Clarinet
  • Flute
  • Oboe
  • Saxophone
  • Wind controller
  • Woodwind doubling
  • Woodwinds with electronics
  • World woodwinds

Posts by category

  • Announcements and news
  • Career
  • Education
  • Favorite blog posts
  • Fun
  • Musicianship
  • Product reviews
  • Web reviews
  • Woodwind playing and pedagogy

Posts by tag

  • practicing
  • equipment
  • jazz
  • reeds
  • recital
  • embouchure
  • books
  • fingering selection
  • musicals
  • Fingering Diagram Builder

Get posts by email

© 2026 Bret Pimentel, woodwinds

Scroll to top
  • About
    • Cookie Policy
  • Resources and tools
    • Woodwind Doubling in Musicals
    • Fingering Diagram Builder
    • Random Note Picker
    • Note Image Generator
    • More…
  • Lessons
  • Shop