A few thoughts on the new Roland Aerophone AE-10

ByBret Pimentel

To be fair, I haven’t tried out the new electronic wind instrument from Roland, and probably won’t bother. (Unless you’re out there, Roland, and want to send me a review unit to change my mind?)

Don’t get me wrong: it’s great to see another company get into this space, and I hope they will seek to innovate further in wind controllers and push other companies (Akai, Yamaha) to do the same. But Roland’s new Aerophone AE-10 seems like a misstep.

n06_0352

Much of the promotional material gushes about how “innovative” the instrument is, but there doesn’t seem to be much to support this claim—it is essentially a very similar instrument to the Akai EWI series or Yamaha WX series, both of which have been around for decades. In implementation and marketing, it really reminds me more of the Casio DH—a novelty for casual playing, not a serious instrument in its own right.

Roland brags about the familiarity of the AE-10’s fingering system: “most digital horns make you master a new fingering system, which can be a major setback…” This positions the instrument as a toy: something saxophonists can pick up and play immediately without having to pay any additional dues. This unfortunately seems to be embedded in the philosophy of the AE-10’s fingering system: fully embracing the limitations of a real saxophone, while missing an opportunity to solidify wind controllers as viable instruments in their own right.

The AE-10’s faithfulness to “real” saxophone fingerings extends to, for example, palm keys. Why do saxophones have palm keys? Certainly not for agility or comfort—palm keys are a significant technical issue for saxophonists. They are Sax’s 1840s solution to the problem of needing to locate tone holes at certain places on the instrument’s body. An electronic instrument has no such constraints: the keys can be literally anywhere on the instrument. (The Akai EWI series does a better job of balancing familiarity with innovation.)

Additionally, the keys appear to move, and to do so in a rather noisy, clicky way. I don’t expect the noise is enough to really be a problem in an amplified situation, but it seems cheap and sloppy—not up to the standards a professional woodwind player demands. (And it strikes me as a very fixable problem on Roland’s end.) Beyond that, I’m not sure that moving keys really make much sense on this kind of instrument. I find the Akai EWI’s motionless keys to be very comfortable and intuitive, similar in touch to playing a recorder or simple-system flute. It’s a very free, agile feeling compared to the relatively clunky mechanisms of a keyed instrument. Why unnecessarily introduce moving parts?

Also from Roland’s website: “There’s nothing worse than a studio session grinding to a halt because you need an instrument that you haven’t brought along. That won’t happen with the Roland Aerophone AE-10, which gives you a variety of additional acoustic instrument sounds like clarinet, flute, oboe, trumpet, violin, and more…” I suppose the AE-10 is being marketed here toward unprofessional studio musicians, who happen to be working on low-quality projects that will tolerate substitution of a synthesized sound when the musician fails to bring the needed instruments?

Speaking of which, most of Roland’s promotional materials surrounding the AE-10 seem to focus on its sounds that imitate “real” instruments (“Choose from alto, tenor, soprano, and baritone sax types that all respond just like their acoustic counterparts…”). But the videos are unconvincing. The saxophone sounds, as usual for an electronic instrument, seem especially unsatisfying—a poor choice for a product that seems to be aimed at the saxophonist market. (My preference is to use wind controllers for “synthy” sounds rather than imitative ones, and the AE-10 does seem to include some.)

The AE-10 does boast some nice but ultimately minor features that I wouldn’t mind having on my Akai:

  • Fingerings are, to some extent, user-programmable (though still not as flexible as the Akai’s EWI fingering mode).
  • An onboard speaker, which seems convenient for practicing. (Roland doesn’t pretend it is usable in a performance situation.)
  • A line-in jack, again probably useful mostly for practicing.
  • A number of handy user-customization settings.
  • It comes with a case.
  • The “Brass section” setting makes it easy to layer sounds.
  • The “Full range” setting automatically switches to different saxophone sounds depending on tessitura. I was unable to determine whether this setting is specific to the saxophone sounds, or whether it is programmable. Could be handy to have several sounds on tap depending on the octave.

The AE-10 seems to be priced in roughly the same ballpark as the Akai 4000S/5000 and Yamaha WX5. (Bear in mind that the Yamaha requires an external sound module at extra cost, while the Akai and Roland have some sounds on board.) My take: spend your money elsewhere.

Similar Posts

  • Vadala doubling book review

    ByBret Pimentel

    Improve Your DoublingI spotted this new review of Chris Vadala’s Improve Your Doubling: Advanced Studies for Doublers on jazzreview.com:

    Featured Book: Improve Your Doubling: Advanced Studies for Doublers [update: link dead]

    I reviewed the book myself a couple of years back.

    The jazzreview.com review is by Peter Westbrook. He gives some nice perspective on woodwind doubling:

    The practice grew out of the need for players to cover parts on more than one instrument in the big bands of the 1920’s and 30s, and spread to the pits of Broadway shows and the TV staff orchestras at NBC and CBS. Saxophonists were initially expected to double on the clarinet until it was largely replaced by the flute in the 50’s, as it saw more acceptance in jazz. The 60’s brought new colors, adding oboe and bassoon parts for doublers—or triplers—to deal with, until players such as the legendary Romeo Penque appeared on the New York studio scene prepared to play every woodwind instrument known to man, often in quick succession, a situation further complicated by the re-emergence of the clarinet on the 1980’s. I counted over 20 instruments stacked up in front of the five-piece reed section of the Maria Schneider Orchestra at a recent concert.

    Read More “Vadala doubling book review”

  • Review: Characteristic Etudes for the Woodwind Doubler by Gene Kaplan

    ByBret Pimentel

    I’ve previously reviewed a couple of Gene Kaplan‘s publications, sets of duets for woodwind doublers. Recently Gene was kind enough to send me a copy of his latest, Characteristic Etudes for the Woodwind Doubler.

    Unlike his previous doubling-duet books, this is intended for a lone woodwind doubler to use in developing his or her doubling skills on flutes (including piccolo and alto flute), oboe and English horn, clarinets (E-flat, B-flat, and bass), saxophones (soprano through baritone), and bassoon and contrabassoon. (Gene suggests that substitutions can be made, so, for example, oboe can be used if you don’t have an English horn.)

    The book includes short etudes in a variety of formats, including ones to strengthen instrument switches within familes (e.g. piccolo to flute to alto flute) and switches between families (e.g. flute to clarinet to…). It also has a section of “Difficult Woodwind Pairs” etudes, plus some slightly longer and more advanced etudes for each of the single instruments addressed in the book.

    The etudes are in varied styles and not overly technically demanding, sticking mostly to moderate tempos and comfortable ranges. The focus here is on the switching, which happens frequently and in short but mostly manageable windows. (Unlike Gene’s duet books or Paul Saunders‘s books with backing tracks, there’s no built-in mechanism to enforce the quick switches, so you’ll need a metronome to keep yourself honest.)

    Here’s a video demo with a couple of sample etudes:

    This is the only doubling book I’m aware of that covers such a broad woodwind family. It’s unusual to see books that include the double reeds or even complete-ish flute and single reed families, much less both. If you are interested in improving your skills on a large number of instruments for Broadway-style doubling gigs, this makes excellent sightreading, or more in-depth work for instruments or switches that you find difficult.

    Get your copy from Gene’s website.

    Thanks, Gene!

  • Synthetic clarinet reeds follow-up

    ByBret Pimentel

    Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases, at no cost to you.

    I’ve posted a few times previously about synthetic reeds, which I believe are the inevitable future of woodwind playing. Last June (2025) I published an article in The Clarinet surveying the clarinet reeds currently on the market.

    Because The Clarinet doesn’t endorse specific products, I stuck to factual information about the reeds I sampled. Eight different makers sent samples, with the understanding that it wouldn’t be a “review” per se.

    I personally found some of the reeds to be surprisingly playable, and others to be dismally bad. (To be fair, some other fine players tested them too, and their conclusions didn’t always match mine.) After the article was published, I reached out to a few of the makers to see if they would be amenable to me using the free samples they had sent for a genuine review here on my blog.

    Luckily, the makers of my two favorites agreed to this, so here are some thoughts on those.

    D’Addario Venn

    D’Addario Woodwinds has sent me a number of products for review over the years, and I have been generally quite pleased with them; a number of their products are still my go-tos for clarinet and saxophone. But they are a relative newcomer to the synthetic reed market, and some first-generation samples I received a few years ago had (by a D’Addario rep’s admission) some quality concerns, so I wasn’t expecting to be wowed. But to my surprise and pleasure they turned out to be my favorites of the bunch (by a narrow margin).

    For me, these were an easy transition from my cane reeds of choice (D’Addario Reserve and sometimes Reserve Evolution). A D’Addario representative tells me the Venn synthetics are not meant to be an exact reproduction of any of their cane reeds, but a new Venn-specific cut. Still, they were familiar enough in feel that I hardly noticed the difference, and came very, very close in sound.

    In fact, after using the Venns exclusively in my studio for a few weeks, I felt confident enough to try them in an orchestral context. After playing part of a rehearsal on a Venn reed, I took advantage of a short break to switch back to a favorite cane reed for a quick comparison. To my dismay, another musician in the orchestra (a woodwind player but not a clarinetist) said, “now that’s a reed!”

    The verdict: the Venn comes pretty close to replacing cane for me, and in terms of function (response, dynamic range, articulation, etc.) seems like an equal match. But tone, though quite good, doesn’t yet seem to fully measure up, at least not for me and my setup.

    The Venn reeds look very much like real cane, in color and fibrous structure. In fact, they look so similar to cane reeds that I’ve had to be extra careful trying to keep them separate. I might welcome some distinctive marking to set them apart visually from cane.

    The Venns are smoother and slicker than cane, which feels nice on my lip but does require a little extra care to make sure I get them properly aligned on the mouthpiece.

    Légère French Cut

    Légère reeds are what pop to mind for me, and I suspect a lot of others, when I think of synthetic reeds. They were the first really viable synthetics I tried, somewhere around 25 years ago, and I have always had some since. They have been a lifesaver especially for playing larger reeds in dry climates, or instruments I play less frequently, or for woodwind doubling situations. Their product line is mature and diverse, which is an advantage over D’Addario.

    The French Cut is one of the newer models, and my favorite of the available offerings. Among the players who tested reeds with me, preferences were somewhat split between the French Cut and the also-newish European Cut.

    I also spent a few weeks playing exclusively on the French Cut clarinet reed, and found it very pleasant and easy to play. Like the Venn, it checks all my boxes for function. I do find that with my setup the French Cut has a little different tone compared to Venn and my favorite cane reeds, but only a little, and not in an unpleasant way.

    I did use the French Cut for performance in a musical theater setting, where I was playing only a small amount of clarinet and could get away with tone a little different from my usual. As expected for a synthetic reed, this was great for switching instruments without worrying about reeds drying out. (I used Légère bass clarinet and saxophone reeds on the same gig.)

    For me, they run a very close second to the Venns in terms of function and tone, but it’s a narrow enough margin to probably chalk up to personal preference or the quirks of my mouthpiece.

    Visually, they won’t be mistaken for cane—they are made in Légère’s characteristic clear synthetic material. I don’t mind the look, but if I’m careless about where I set one, it can be hard to spot from across the room. Their slightly textured surface gives them more of the grippy-ness of cane, which feels familiar on my lip and doesn’t require any special effort to place on the mouthpiece.

    Both

    The Venn and Légère synthetics, of course, both share the positive qualities of synthetic materials: longevity, consistency, and impervious-ness to climate. Both are instantly ready to play with no soaking. At the time of this writing, they seem to be selling for almost exactly the same price per reed, which is to say about the cost of a box of 10 cane reeds.

    Both brands also make saxophone reeds, which I’ve dabbled with but haven’t had as much opportunity to test thoroughly.

    Have I switched?

    As I concluded in the article in The Clarinet, I do think that there are some quite viable options for switching fully to synthetic reeds for professional playing, and these two products are certainly among them. Some world-class players have already made the switch to using synthetics exclusively.

    I personally haven’t. While I still believe synthetics are the future, I find myself in a transitional phase. I’ll keep both the Venns and the Légères on hand, and will likely continue to use both at least sporadically. But I’m not fully ready to give up my cane reeds yet.

    I suspect both companies are continuing to refine and develop their product lines, and if their next rounds of offerings are even small improvements on the current products, that may be enough for me to switch over completely.

    Or, if I decided the hassles of cane were too much, I might be able to switch to current synthetic products and adapt my playing to them. I live in a humid climate where I find cane reeds relatively easy to care for, but if I found myself performing in a drier atmosphere or higher altitude that might be enough to convince me to change. Even if I needed to change mouthpieces to get the best out of the synthetic reeds, it might well be worth it.

    Should you switch?

    I think it’s important to remember that someone else’s experiences with a product, including mine, are personal and based on a variety of factors, including what other equipment they use, the finer points of their playing technique, and many other musical and practical factors. The only good way to know if synthetics are right for you is to try them.

    That’s also why I’m not including audio samples here. You will get much more useful information by trying them yourself. (And my experience in the orchestra rehearsal was a good reminder to me that it’s worth getting an unbiased opinion from someone with good ears.)

    In any case, the high-quality synthetic reeds currently on the market are an exciting and promising development, and I look forward to what’s next.

  • Required recordings, fall 2010

    ByBret Pimentel

    A new semester is starting, and my university students have new required recordings.

    There are a number of criteria that go into these selections, but I mentioned one in particular back in the spring:

    So far my two-semester tally, selecting recordings for four different instruments, is six white men and two white women. I’d like to improve on that in the future, though I do think that, ultimately, what comes through the earphones is more central to this project than the colors or genders represented on the CD covers.

    I think I did manage to pick out two this semester that add a little diversity, and certainly without compromising one bit on quality: my oboe students are getting a fine recording by Brazilian oboist Alex Klein, and the saxophonists will be enjoying a new release by African-American saxophonist (and one of my teachers) Otis Murphy. On the other hand, I did end up with all men this time around.

    One other victory this semester is that all these recordings are available for download on iTunes. I still like having the CD myself, but iTunes is a convenient and, more importantly, economical option for my students.

    Here are the selections:

    Oboe: Alex Klein, Oboe Concertos of the Classical Era

    Find it on: iTunes | Amazon

    Repertoire: Krommer Concertos, Hummel Introduction, Theme, and Variations Read More “Required recordings, fall 2010”

  • Review: New woodwind doubling duets from Gene Kaplan and Paul Saunders

    ByBret Pimentel

    A couple of new books of duets for woodwind doublers hit my inbox recently. (I received complimentary copies without any promise of a review.) Gene Kaplan has published a second volume of his Duos for Doublers, following up the volume I reviewed previously. And Paul Saunders, whose other doubling publications I’ve reviewed, has written Six Duets for Woodwind Doublers.

    As I noted in previous reviews, (solo) etudes for woodwind doublers have an issue: it’s too easy to take extra time during instrument changes, a luxury that doesn’t exist in musical theater or many other doubling scenarios. Kaplan’s two volumes solve this by pairing the player with another doubler. Saunders’s previous works provided piano accompaniment (including downloadable backing tracks). Either solution keeps the woodwind doubler accountable to another musician (at least a virtual one) to execute the quick changes without disrupting the tempo.

    Saunders’s new publication expands on his previous offerings by introducing a duet format with piano or backing track. The backing tracks include versions with just accompaniment (piano plus a virtual rhythm section), or with accompaniment plus Saunders ably playing the first woodwind part, or with accompaniment plus the second part.

    Kaplan’s solution of course requires a duet partner with skills on three instruments, but also provides some flexibility in rehearsal with tempos or repeating problem sections. With two volumes available, each with a dozen 2-3 page duets, this would be a great resource for a sight reading session with a friend or student. (This new volume has well-placed page turns.)

    Saunders’s approach lends itself well to solo practice, and since you can play either part with Saunders covering the other, the six duets amount to twelve parts to work on. The included piano score also raises some possibilities for a polished public performance. (The introduction also indicates that the duets are composed to work without the accompaniment.)

    The books are similar in instrumentation, for flute/clarinet/saxophone doublers, with the first part using alto saxophone and the second using tenor. Saunders’s book has one duet with optional piccolos. I’ve been clear that I think the flute/clarinet/saxophone doubling paradigm is outdated in the 21st century, and while the market for such things is admittedly probably small, I’d like to see more resources available that incorporate double reeds.

    Both books publish the duets as separate parts, which is probably a closer match to the musical theater doubling experience, but I do prefer seeing both lines on the same page. With Saunders’s book, the additional piano score does show both parts, which could be helpful for perusal or rehearsal.

    I’ve updated my Music for woodwind doublers page to include these new publications. Keep me posted if you are aware of additional ones.

  • ClariMate review follow-up

    ByBret Pimentel

    Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases, at no cost to you.

    Almost two years ago I posted a review of the ClariMate digital clarinet mute by Buffet-Crampon. My conclusion at that point was that the ClariMate was an interesting concept, but with some technical issues.

    At that point the ClariMate seemed to be positioned mostly as a tool for practicing the clarinet silently. I found that to be a bit of a stretch, maybe having limited usefulness for practicing fingerings but far less helpful with matters of tone production.

    At that time, some of the promotional materials also suggested that the ClariMate could be used as a MIDI controller. That turned out to be incorrect, and a Buffet-Crampon confirmed that the feature was “not publicly available yet.”

    There is now some MIDI functionality available. A dual purpose of silent practice plus MIDI capability is reflected in the current advertising copy (found at the ClariMate US website as of mid-September 2024): “Silent Practice, Digital Play,” “ClariMate is a Reversible Hybrid Instrument and Digital Practice Mute for Bb clarinets,” “Opening the door to silent practice and the world of digital music.” This is bolstered with some videos of prominent clarinetists using the ClariMate as a MIDI controller.

    Reliability

    As I mentioned in my full review, I had some issues with my unit, including sporadic inoperability and a persistent failure to complete the “reed calibration” process in the apps. (Calibrating the reed ostensibly makes it possible to bend pitch by applying more or less pressure to the reed. This is a common feature of many wind controllers, though I don’t think it’s an accurate reflection of how pitch is manipulated on the clarinet.)

    To their credit, members of Buffet-Crampon’s ClariMate team have stayed in touch over the last couple of years, and ultimately offered to exchange my ClariMate for a new unit. I have spent a little time with the new unit and I do find it to be more stable, though it’s not clear to me whether that’s due to a defect in the previous one or to improvements to the firmware and apps.

    I did manage to complete the reed calibration process in the Windows app, but only after many attempts with the new unit. And I still find that I do not have any real control of pitch bends. Most of the time the pitch is completely unaffected no matter how much or how little pressure I put on the reed. I do hear very occasional small bends while playing, but they are not intentional and I can’t figure out how to make them happen on purpose.

    MIDI features

    I also experimented a little with the new MIDI functionality. The ClariMate website now offers free “MIDIMate” software, a rudimentary soft synth for Windows and MacOS with a handful of sounds. I was also able to use the ClariMate with another Windows soft synth, and with a music notation program for note entry, though both were considerably more glitchy than MIDIMate or the ClariMate apps.

    In researching the new MIDI capabilities, I did a web search for “ClariMate manual” and clicked the first result, a PDF hosted on the ClariMate EU website. It contains this text: “MIDI will work in USB or bluetooth mode via Windows or MacOS, and in bluetooth mode via Android and iOS. We recommend using MIDI in USB mode to reduce latency as much as possible.” I was unable to get ClariMate MIDI working with my Android device, and a representative has now confirmed that MIDI is “not yet available on Android, but should be soon.” He also pointed me to a more up-to-date version of the manual, which does not include the misleading text. (If you are looking for a current manual, you should visit the ClariMate website to make sure you aren’t looking at something outdated.)

    The fact that MIDI capability was falsely advertised at the ClariMate’s launch, and that Android MIDI was falsely mentioned in a recent user’s manual, seem consistent with an apparent pattern of over-promising and under-delivering. That’s concerning when selling a not-inexpensive gadget to tech-savvy clarinetists, a finicky bunch if ever there was one. The older manuals should probably be removed from the ClariMate websites so they will disappear from Google results, and it would be responsible of Buffet-Crampon to be precise and truthful about which features are and aren’t available.

    Use cases?

    My ClariMate has mostly stayed in its case. I am fortunate to have a space where I can practice out loud, and if that were to change I don’t think the ClariMate’s silent practice functionality would suit my purposes. And the MIDI compatibility pales in comparison to the capabilities and reliability of my Akai wind controller. If you are a professional or semi-professional musician and finding good uses for the ClariMate, I would be curious to hear about them.

    I’m grateful to the ClariMate team for their ongoing communication and support, and I hope this device will be a first step toward continuing innovation.

40 Comments

  1. I thought this was a toy as well, and then heard these….

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHlG_PwwvGY

    And now I’m not so sure…..some of those sounds sound pretty good. I think Roland is aiming more towards the EWI5000 with the builtin sounds. I’d have to listen to a 5000 to see (last I remember, I thought the 5000 sounded kind of meh). I guess it really comes down to how does it play. If it plays well, or plays well with Midi, like maybe with Apple Mainstage, I could see people using this. Just plug in a USB cable you could have a fairly good controller to use with your laptop to get some more realistic sounds.

    The marketing though needs to drop the chump with the hairdo though. He can’t play his way out of a paper bag.

    Reply

  2. Bret
    It hasn’t been released yet & the feature set hasn’t been finalised yet.I play all the woodwinds except bassoon & have all the wind controllers so far released except the sylpho.I am used to a number of different fingering systems but as my principal instrument is the saxophone,the wind controller I am most adept at playing is the synthophone (which as you know is a saxophone stuffed with electronics & is very expensive).Despite working hard with the ewis I still glitch from time to time.The appeal of a controller where you can feel comfortable on straight away is I think going to make it appeal to sax players particularly at the price point.As far as the sounds go I am not going to replace my acoustic saxes,clarinet,bass or contrabass clarinet,flute ,oboe,english horn or piccolo with the aerophone-but would consider using it for sounds of instruments I don’t play if needed.It may also be a quiet mobile practice tool.
    The marketing & product release method is unusual-more aimed at consumers.

    Reply

  3. I’ve played the WX series since they were invented. Also had both EWIs (sold both.) Woodwind synth is a different animal, but I think I’ve played the Yamahas long enough to consider them a separate instrument from the saxes (I play bari,tenor,alto and soprano.)

    I’ll give this a fair chance. I’ve tried teaching some world class sax players to use the WX with horrible results (but these guys are in their seventies / eighties. I think this might work for them.

    Certainly the firmware is WAY more advanced than anything we have experienced from controllers before. There is room for lots of potential customization.

    Reply

    1. Hi Jan

      I agree with your comments – I too have used the Yamaha’s WX series and the EWI’s before coming back to the WX 5 with the VL-70m with the Patchman Turbo chip
      I have had the Aerophone for some 2 months and despite trying to tailor the sounds to my taste I find it disappointing in the sound menu
      I have the RD700 and love the SuperNatural sounds on it but the chance to use this method to have near acoustic sounds it falls towards synth sounds which are boring
      Where is a Flugel horn – several trumpet and muted trumpet sounds
      The WX 5 + VL-70m with the Patchman Turbo chip is ,in my opinion far superior in providing realistic sounds
      I have just updated to version 2 expecting an improvement – but again dominated by extra synth sounds

      Reply

    2. Today I tried the ae 10, the reason for my choice is that one can adjust the amount of breath required to play the instrument and the sax fingering.
      I found the fingering easy to get used to and the octave key well placed easy to operate. The breath adjustment was excellent and I soon found the setting I required. But oh dear the sound through the speaker, now that was poor, the alto sax sounded more of a tinny sound than a sax, the clarinet was slightly better and the flute even better but all lacked something.
      Put the headphones in and what a difference the sounds were really good and clear.
      Batteries lasted well but oh why can’t they be recharged in situ when you plug in the mains lead!
      In the end I didn’t buy one the reason, well I wanted something I could take out of the bag switch it on and play with a realistic sound, not something one had to plug in headphones, or speakers or computer or amp to get that realistic sound.

      Reply

  4. Bret, your initial thoughts were EXACTLY the same as mine! I question the business notion behind this device- who exactly do they think they’ll sell it to in mass quantities? I used to be a district manager for a large music retail chain, and Roland always seemed to view the wind synth market with great disdain. This is a big surprise, and I too thought of the Casio toy at first. I don’t really care about emulations or on-board sounds- I can get all I need out of my 2) VL-70’s and Motif rack with my WXs. I’ve been playing wind synth since 1978 (Lyricons) and have owned EWIs, too. The first AE-10 videos I saw were a joke, but then I happened across this guy Alistair in the links Eric posted, and he really plays it musically. Made me stop and wonder. Akai and Yamaha have not innovated much over the past few years, and with the advent of iOS synths and Mainstage setups, it would be neat to have a USB-based controller to consider. So I remain skeptical, but I’m interested in trying one to see if it’s a viable instrument- maybe even hopeful :).

    Reply

    1. I came in from the WX-11 platform until its brain (read breakout-box) got fried after 30! (!) years of service. A machine manufactured by Yamaha in Germany. So I had to find a replacement and the closest thing I had was AKAI since Yamaha stopped making the VL70’s and their WX5/WX7 hardware controller. I was stuck and I was taking a hard look at myself and what I did. All I really needed was a direct USB in to work with my wind-synths from Sample-modeling and I would be in the clear.
      The EWI 4000s was on the market at the time and I had no feeling for its sound, nor did it have a USB port. And the price at the time was really expensive. (Now it’s down to a good, reasonable price-point here in Japan.) There was only one solution. The Akai EWI-USB answered my need and I was a little bit scared to try it out in the store, however I can now recommend anyone who have gone sad for their old WX/WT/VL hardware breaking down, but still only using it to control VSTi’s. Look no further.

      The Akai EWI 5000 is doing everything that the Roland does. Akai’s has more value for the money and it also has a lot more offering for people from different backgrounds can come into the EWI series and learn a new instrument from scratch. It did take me 2 weeks to re-adjust my “thumb-rest” error on the EWI, but now it’s like a part of me. Using it live with my Microsoft Surface Pro 4 with Sample Modelings more superior acoustic/physics modeled sounds. Plus I also program my own lead patches in Omnisphere.

      The Akai EWI-USB is the most incredible piece of machine and I’m now glancing at the Akai 4000s as a cool thing to have on stage for the more synth-based stuff and hook it up to vocoders etc.

      For just MIDI-control if you don’t care about the machine not having any sounds, go with AKAI EWI-USB.
      If you want some acoustic sounds and a huge variety of sounds on the MOVE, Akai EWI 5000 does it better than Roland. (EWI 5000 has 100 patches plus user-banks, meanwhile Roland has only 40.)
      The EWI 5000 is also more reasonably priced than the Roland Aerophone 10.

      I’m not saying that any of those 2 instrument could replace any real winds or brass, but it could add an element of feeling when performed in a group, not by itself.

      So best value for many between Akai EWI 5000 and the Roland, the EWI wins, hands down.

      /Daniel Lindholm
      EWI-player, music-producer

      Reply

      2. I have had the Akai 4000 and the 5000 and to be honest I would NEVER buy another instrument with a built in / purpose made battery,and the Akai are very prone to going wrong. Roll on the Roland with its replaceable batteries.

  5. itI’m working with EWIs since the EWI 1000 decades ago (EWI 5000 is my third one) and after watching the first promo videos of the AE-10 and listening to the clicking sounds of its keys on some other videos I was rather disappointed, so I share most of Bret’s resentments, despite the excitement of Roland finally launching a wind synth after my playing Roland synth keys and modules since the early 80’s. I still hope to find a wind controller with premium internal sounds and a fast CPU. The Akai, while having perhaps half a dozen usable presets, is awfully slow regarding patch loading, and the sample based engine has a lot of restrictions performancewise, so overall, I think despite the mature hardware itself the EWI leaves a lot to be desired. On the other hand, I like Roland’s Supernatural engine and the prospect of having wind gear using that is rather tempting. Additionally, as Michael Webster aleady mentioned, ir is almost impossible not to glitch on the EWI, so the mechanical keys are perhaps not so bad as it seems. As I mostly play synth sounds with the wind controller, it remains to be seen, if the AE-10 will satisfy the needs of professional musicians.

    Reply

  6. Hey guys, y’all haven’t seen the real beast! So let’s wait and try it out. I have so much equipment from ROLAND and I’m using it for decades… Nothing they did was sh**. Would be happy to own one.

    Reply

  7. I have played a Casio DH500for about 10 years, love it but wanted a bit more as far as various tones. I have a wireless midi set-up that attaches to a Casio Keyboard ( a small one) and that gives me a bit more in sound and novelty. I have scribed thousands of midis using Melody Assistant and Notation Composer ( at 78 I have the time and inclination to do so), scribing music from 1120 through 2016 – early music, classical music, jazz, Irish, folk music, etc. and look forward to experimenting with the Roland Aerophone ae-10. I perform only as a non-professional and play along with these midis. It seems from all that I read that we now have the replacement for my Casio DH500 ( I have three of them) that also has an internal speaker, has 40 voices and from what I have seen on YouTube meets all that I have asked Casio to manufacture, but they never ever answered my e-mails. Congratulations to Roland for having the courage to make this and enter the Wind Controller market.

    Reply

  8. Now that I’ve played on an AE-10 for two hours (and happily returned it afterwards) I sadly have to confirm all of Bret’s concerns and then some. I could write a list of things that bothered me when trying it out. One of them the mouthpiece being cheap plastic so you see wear from your front teeth on top after two(!) minutes of cautious playing. The ‘reed’ is just a kind of modulation on/off lever, so you cannot produce a sensitive manual frequency vibrato with your lower lip like on a real sax, or on an EWI. A woodwind sound like an oboe with preprogrammed, mechanical vibrato is just awful imho (being a professional woodwind player for about thirty years). Some of the sounds were better than expected, like the alto or the tenor. Others, like the few synth patches, were (considering Roland to be a mayor player in making synthesizers) just uninspiring. The chunky “palm keys” are really no joy to practice with, when you have to press two of them with one finger for certain fingerings. The dreaded octave glitches on the EWI are there, too, but at least on the EWI you know where you are. It’s easy to accidentally slide to the small octave buttons next to the main ones. And the “joystick” knob beneath the thumb hook is really awkward to use, as your thumb is important to support the instrument. Of course, if you practise many, many hours, you might be able to cope with that. And why is there a single joint output for headphones and audio? Why is there no option to change the type of controller message the AE-10 sends? It’s preset to CC 11, and all my synth modules are working with CC 2, so I would spend some time to accommodate the new gear with my MIDI setup. I could rant on and on, but I’ll stop here. I really wanted to like the AE-10, but in the end the weak impression persisted.

    Reply

  10. In terms of brass instrument replacement, marvellous for people who have to practice in small apartments – urban Japanese, for example; but it’s always going to sound like a stylophone in the end. And what do you do about spit?

    Reply

  11. I’m sure your points are spot on if you cwant snider this to be an instrument in its own right. I don’t! I’m learning the saxophone, and thus the fingering system, I have young kids, and live in a semi-detached house. Basically I can practice when the kids are in school. Anything after 3 pm is just a nuisance. Furthermore, being a long haul pilot, I spend A LOT of time in hotels. Needless to say, practicing an acoustic sax at 3 am (due to jet lag) wouldn’t go down too well.

    With this instrument, I can practice where and when I want, without having to learn a new fingering system. That is unlike any other electrical sax on the market that I’ve found. This is a god send for people like me.

    The fact that the sound may not be spot on doesn’t bother me at all. As long as it sounds remotely like a sax, and is in tune, I can practice my playing on this, and then get the real sound when I get home to my acoustic.

    Is there a big enough market for this instrument. I don’t know. I don’t care. As long as I get mine in 7-14 business day, I’m happy!

    Reply

  13. I bought an Aerophone – never played a wind instrument before as I am a guitarist- and have some much fun with it.
    The sax-like fingering was very important to me because I can start learning the instrument by using a regular sax course. Was not sure how to start with an EWI.

    I also prefer moving keys against touch keys.

    The EWI 5000 has also a built in battery and this is an ABSOLUTE NO for me.

    Reply

  15. I’ve used the Yamaha WX series for well over 25 years now, but in a quite different way from what the other posters do, I’m sure. I’m a woodwind player and band director (now retired) and I discovered years ago what a great help the wind controller can be in working on intonation (if I’m playing a note in unison with the flute player and we’re not in tune, it ain’t my fault!). We’re approaching intonation from an entirely aural, rather than a visual perspective (using a tuner, that is).

    As I explain to the students, it has 3 great advantages: 1) I’m never “out of tune” (yes, I know, but temperament’s a discussion for another time); 2) I can be heard above the entire band; and 3) I can play in unison with the piccolo and the tuba and everything in between. Oh yes, and if need be, I can play as fast as any of you!

    I’ve use both the WT-11 and VL70m sound modules but I use only one (yes, one) sound, the clarinet. I’ve long dreamed of having a midi controller with onboard sound (just one) and speaker that I could roam around the room with. I do have a MidiJet Pro with the WX-5, which works well, though it’s a bit cumbersome and, worse, if I’m working with the tubas in the back of the room and the sound’s coming from the front of the room, that’s far from ideal.

    I tried the Akai, which meets some of those needs, but I do prefer keys that move, and I found the octave mechanism very unsatisfactory, so I remain in the Yamaha camp.

    My dream is a simple wireless wind controller with just one sound. I’ve visited with some of my friends at Yamaha about this, but to no avail. You’d be hard pressed to find a band room in my state (Texas) without a Yamaha Harmony Director keyboard, currently about $1,500. It’s a wonderful device, but hardly portable and, like most band director types, my keyboard chops lag far behind my woodwind skills.

    If someone—Yamaha or anyone else—could produce a simple, inexpensive device (say, $500 range or so) of the kind I describe, and marketed it properly, I haven’t the least doubt that band directors nationwide would be beating the doors down to get one.

    Reply

  16. My biggest complaints about the Akai EWI are

    – I cannot rest my fingers on the keys as I do with other instruments
    – The EWI is a compromise that isn’t 100% intuitive for anyone

    I love that a company has created something for a sax player to give them something closer to the feel of their axe. There is no reason that a company shouldn’t be able to deliver something that’s intuitive to the player from day one.

    I recognize that the fingerings on the EWI are more flexible and that many people have invested time in learning the EWI. That’s great, but that shouldn’t preclude anyone else from having the option of an instrument that they can “just pick up” and feel at home with.

    Reply

  17. Excellent comments from most here — For a pretty good first impression review from a sax player on the AE-10, check out this video:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3T0hPzH6jhU

    A bit of background: I started playing oboe when I was 13, then sax and flute then in the late 70’s I got a Lyricon, then switched to Yamaha WX7 in the 80s which are my controllers of choice. I have all of them but favor the WX11 for its octave key layout and overall reliability. I also own an EWI 5000 — but anyone who thinks it’s onboard sounds are good is aiming way too low or has never played through a VL-70. I have two of those with Matt’s chips onboard and highly recommend this combo to ALL wind players. If anyone here knows of a better, more playable wind controller-geared synth, please post your thoughts.

    Reply

  18. I just saw the Aerophone 2.0 at NAMM 2017! I absolutely love it! I’ve been playing an AKAI EWI 4000s for about 5years. I’ve never felt comfortable enough to really use it at gigs. It’s temperature sensitive,unpredictable in the strange sounds which come out of no where and I’ve never quite figured those darned octave rollers. Yes, it came with 100 sounds built in. I have only found about 10 to be of any real value. So that immediately leads us to Patchman Sounds if you want any real synth sounds on an EWI 4000. He is basically a one-man shop supporting these upgrades. When I called him to to discuss an upgrade, he basically hung up the phone before I was really done inquiring. The EWI requires waay too much “tweeking” in order to play. As a saxophonist, I only wanted a synth for exotic and fun sounds and for music scoring. Why would I expect it to sound as good as my acoustic saxes, which I love playing and have heavy investments of time and $$$.

    We buy equipment for specific purpose and roles. The Aerophone more than fulfills that role.

    Reply

    1. I have just downloaded a free app for AE-10 from Roland, Aerophone Editor which looks exciting. I look forward to some expert comment on the usefulness as I am a bit old to be much more than casual user. It downloads to my Samsung S6

      Reply

  19. I have the original Akai EWI 1000/2000, but sadly, it needs repair.

    I have the Yamaha EX5 and the Yamaha VL70m (no Matt Patchman goodies, though), but sadly, the octave “keys” are stupid small for my Rachmaninoff size hands.

    A friend of mine has the Akai 5000, and the sounds are dull in my view.

    I’ve not tried the Akai 4000.
    The octave rollers on my EWI 1000 were challenging but doable;the WX5 octave buttons just are not (even with extensive attempts and modification).

    I do prefer the WX5 non-octave keys to the Akai touch plates.

    I also prefer the Yamaha reed to the EWI bite plate (at least the 1000’s one)

    I’ve played saxophone since 1973 (same Mark VI tenor, in fact).

    I’m primarily a Jazz player.

    If I’m correct the either the EWI 4000 or 5000 can be MIDI’d, it comes down to (1) onboard sounds and (2) play-ability (including the mouthpiece, or reasonable facsimile thereof).

    Anybody here who has actually played all three and can comment on issues 1 and 2?

    I don’t double on other woodwinds. I play piano.

    Thanks,

    – Jeff

    Reply

  20. Now a after a year of reading posts and watching videos I have changed my initial opinion which was based on horrible marketing and a product that was released before proper testing. After two firmwear and one color change it now is worth taking the risk. I have a bad case of G.A.S. (Gear Acquisition Syndrome)

    Reply

  21. Mike, honestly to do a review of some gear without trying it out seems to me worthless. These are all words without substance, sorry for that. I tried out an AKAI and I was disappointed mainly because of the touch keys. There is a big difference in keeping the finger tips resting on the keys rather than floating them above the sensors.

    And there is an other point I want to mention. A lot of musicians using DAWs and for instance MainStage even on stage today. So there is not wrong by using a midi controller at all. If someone prefers a wind controller rather than a keyboard, why not.
    And a word to the YAMAHA VL-70m: this is old stuff from the last century. Compared to the processors today it sounds familiar and great to the owner but horrible.

    Reply

  22. The Akai 5000 is a cool looking insrument. It has 100 sounds but only 10 are decent sounds the other 90 are cheap cheesy toy and awfull I would certainly never use them , I am a pro sax /flute player and vocalist and I bought it for the synth sounds but unfortunatly theres not many of them and the sax sounds are embarrassing.Lets hope Akai in the future come up with better quality internal sounds in the future then they will have cracked the wind synth market !

    Reply

    1. I agree re 5000 sounds. In fact, thery are so cheese city that I bought the Aerophone instead. I own the original, analog EWI. Much hipper.

      Reply

      1. With the 2.2 update for the AE10 I was finally able to get the vibrato I want with the Sample Modeling Istruments I mainly use in a Big Band. For an acoustic guitar group I am using and loving the internal Violin sound. When people ask me “what is that” I tell them it is a fiddle stick. That is the only usable internal sound that has gotten acceptance in that group and I enjoy the expression I can achieve.

  23. Hello all
    Was googling AE-10 and found this post. So I hope someone will read this and maybe have some thoughts? No one responded to me on the yahoo wind controller mailing list and I can’t figure out if the patchman music forums are still active.
    I am a blind sax player and play the wx5 with the vl70M with patchman music upgrade chip. I purchased in college and since I was majoring in music, I had friends and professors who were willing to help me memorize button presses. For example, I can switch patches on the wx5 as well as add patches to the internal bank on the vl70. It’s been quite a few years now doing this on my own.
    I have to send the wx5 back to patchman because the circular rubber piece that holds the mouthpiece in place won’t stay lubricated. As of now the mouthpiece will not come off of the wx and I don’t want to force it. I have the money to get it repaired but I was thinking about the AE-10 since the wx is now discontinued. Not sure how much longer parts can be found etc?
    I have a few problems with this however even though I am quite fascinated by the AE-10. The built in sounds sound quite nice and so does 7 hour battery life.
    Cost:
    I probably won’t be able to trade my wx for an AE-10 unless patchman music had a used one? I’d like them to set it up since they set up my WX5-vl70M for me and all I have to do is play. I will use the internal sounds but will also be using it with the vl70M, Yamaha Motif Rack XS (Haven’t bought soundbanks yet) and eventually the patchman Native Instrument Kontakt instruments and saxes/brass from Sample Modeling if someone could help me configure them for wind controller use. Looks like a $130.00 USB to midi adapter would be needed.
    Usage:
    Being blind, the display screen and menus scare me. The IOS and Android editors somewhat read with the built in screen readers (VoiceOver and TalkBack) but not sure how useable they would be and don’t see Roland assisting 1 blind player with improvements anytime soon. As said above, can it be set up once and I’ll never have to use the menu again? There appear to be shortcut keys for selecting preset and user patches but what about selecting patches from the vl70M/motif?
    Any thoughts or assistance on this would be greatly appreciated, thanks!
    Regards
    Jay Pellis

    Reply

  24. The reviewer admits right off the bat that he hasn’t actually tried the product, thus entirely disqualify himself as a reviewer and losing all credibility.

    Then his main criticism of the instrument seems to be that the fingering is too much like saxophone fingering, which is actually a huge plus for saxophone players (who are, of course, the primary market).

    Hilariously lame.

    Reply

  26. Well I have played the Akai EWI and the Roland Aerophone and as a Sax player I can say I am enjoying playing the Aerophone way better. Brett said Roland missed the mark and embracing saxophone fingering was a mis-step. I disagree. It not only is instantly familiar to sax players but give you range that you don’t have on a regular saxophone. 3 octaves up and down make this instrument a beast. That coupled to the synth sounds build in and the ability to midi it to your favorite computer DAW and you can compose music with this laying track after track. This is a hit as far as I am concerned and going gigging with this is a way better experience than the Akai EWI since I would have to drag around a lot more equipment with it.

    Reply

  27. Ok, I have an issue when someone admits they haven’t tried a product but still writes a review about it. Can you imagine a food critic writing a review about a meal but never tasted the food? Why was this review even posted. Here is a review from someone who has actually tried the Roland AE-10 version 3.0 and I LOVE it! I am an experienced sax player and has played tenor and soprano sax for over 20 years. I was just looking for something fun to add to my sax family. I was playing the EWI 5000 for a year, but 2 weeks after playing the Roland AE-10 I decided to sell my EWI, that’s how impressed I was with the Roland AE-10. It was so much easier and fun to play, and the quality sounds are amazing. I recently played this at my church and I used the violin and harmonica sounds and after church many people were coming up to the band wondering who were playing those instruments. I have started using the Roland AE-10 in some of my studio sessions. Now don’t get me wrong there are some minor quirks I hope Roland work on such as the sound the keys make when pressed, but that’s minor. The only time I hear the keys is when I am playing the instrument and listening through the unit speakers. The majority of time I play with the head phones or through a sound system. Coming up with a wireless unit like the EWI 5000, would be a nice upgrade. Bottom line, take it from someone who has actually tried this instrument and who has thoroughly enjoyed it. I think most sax players will love it too. Just sayin’

    Reply

    1. Total agree with Saxmo, this “review” is BS. I received my AE-10 today and am VERY impressed. It’s definitely not a toy, obviously it won’t replace a real sax but the fact that you can transfer your knowledge and play it out of the box is a huge win. I’ll use it to practice when I want a practice in non-conventional hours and for travel I think it’s perfect too. Roland did a great job with this instrument.

      Reply

  28. Thanks Bret and everyone in the comment for the critical reviews. Been browsing reviews on the aerophone for a while but for some reason, all of them seem to be only positive reviews. Roland has been aggressively pushing out paid reviews everywhere, including some comments here which keep linking back to Roland own YT videos (pretty obvious right?). Also, Alistair has been covering only aerophone since its release in 2016 (not a single review on EWI and Yamaha), so I’m very skeptical of his reviews or whoever mentions him.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments that take a negative or confrontational tone are subject to email and name verification before being approved. In other words: no anonymous trolls allowed—take responsibility for your words.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.