Interview: Ryan Lillywhite of Cannonball Musical Instruments

Ryan Lillywhite of Cannonball Musical Instruments

I’m pleased to share an interview that I did with Ryan Lillywhite of Cannonball Musical Instruments. Ryan and I played in college jazz band together, and recently reconnected. He is a really creative and fun soloist with an incredible tenor sound, plus a cool guy with a cool job, not to mention a new dad. Read all the way to the bottom to find a video of Ryan and his Cannonball colleagues (all very tasty players) showing off their chops and their horns. Cannonball is a serious contender in today’s saxophone market, doing some very interesting and innovative things, generating some great buzz, and signing big-name endorsing artists left and right. Ryan was kind enough to answer a few questions about what he does at work. [Full disclosure: I recently bought a new Cannonball tenor with Ryan’s expert help, and it is a seriously awesome horn.]

BP: Tell us a little about yourself.

RL: I work for Cannonball Musical Instruments. I studied at Brigham Young University where I started in music but ended up graduating with a business degree and a music minor. When I’m not working, I stay busy performing, fixing up old horns, working on my old muscle car, and spending time with my wife and five-month-old daughter.

Tell us about your performing background.

I had a blast as lead tenor in Synthesis (BYU’s jazz band); I’ve performed with the Utah Symphony and some smaller local groups, recorded for movies and commercials, and recently performed with the Cannonball Band at the Salt Lake City International Jazz Festival. Most of that was on tenor sax, but I’ve done my share of doubling on flutes and clarinets in pit orchestras. I currently take my jazz quartet around for local weddings and other events, which I’ve been doing for about a decade now and still enjoy. Especially when food is provided.

What is your job title? What do you do at work?

It kind of depends on the day … we all wear a lot of hats around here. I play test, inspect, and acoustically customize about half of the saxophones we sell; I’m in charge of the spare parts/repair department; I manage a number of international accounts; I do our social media; I contribute to product and acoustical development and testing; I clean the boys’ bathroom (hey, you asked!); and whatever other projects come up. Things definitely don’t get boring around here.

How did you get the job?

I begged. For years.

Actually, I met Tevis (President of Cannonball and husband of CEO Sheryl) when we performed together at a concert while I was still in school. I said, “Nice sax.” He responded, “Thanks—I made it.” That was my introduction to Cannonball saxes, and I tried to get my foot in the door from then on. But they didn’t have room, so it wasn’t until a few years later that there was finally an opening.

How many people do what you do? Do you see that number expanding in the foreseeable future?

As far as the play-testing and acoustical work, there are just two of us. We stay very busy, and we might add another eventually, but we don’t have any current plans to.

Is it an 8-5, Monday-Friday kind of gig?

Kind of, but it’s a lot more fun than that sounds. Tevis and Sheryl are great employers who run a very successful company, but they also make it a lot of fun to work here. We can wear shorts and sandals and joke around, and if I have a late morning it’s usually not a problem. Of course, as long as I get my work done—I’m often here pretty late. And I do some traveling to trade shows and other events to mix it up a few times a year.

But I work with musicians, which is also fun. Tevis is a woodwind player—he was a college bassoon major, plays all the double reeds, saxes, clarinet, flutes, etc., and was a performer/recorder before they started Cannonball; and Sheryl taught music at a middle school, and was also a performing saxophonist as well as a pianist and vocalist. Almost all of my coworkers are also musicians. So as you could imagine, it’s a quirky but fun atmosphere.

From a business perspective, what’s unique about Cannonball?

I’ve worked for large and successful companies in real estate, finance, and architecture, and there is one thing that really surprised me about Cannonball: the bottom line. All my past employers are primarily concerned with profit margins, and they base their decisions on that. It’s the business standard. Cannonball, by contrast, is primarily concerned with making great instruments. And it’s not just a nice mission statement or quote—when we’re developing or improving an instrument, costs are effectively ignored. Sound and quality are the focus. Most long-standing instrument manufacturers may have started with musician managers, but have since been passed from one businessman to another MBA until what we have today are efficient businesses that happen to make musical instruments (and that can’t figure out why musicians don’t like their current instruments as much as their 50-year-old horns). Cannonball is a bunch of passionate musicians who want to make great instruments.

What’s the best part of your job?

There are a lot of perks. My short three-mile commute, the variety of work that keeps things interesting, the great coworkers, my own soundproof office—they’re all great. But I love making saxophones that players and artists fall in love with. It’s a mixture of art and science what we do: manipulating the metal, changing the airflow to make the overtones line up right, to get the core sound to be rich and responsive with the right balances of resistant/free blowing, warm/edgy, focused/big, etc. When someone tells us their story of how they fell in love with their Cannonball, and they’re so excited they can’t put it down—that’s what it’s all about.

3-mile commute? That must be nice.

Yeah, I rollerbladed to work one day just to say I did it.

What’s the worst part?

The worst part? Hmm. Sometimes we’ll get pounded with a surge of urgent orders and it gets pretty stressful. I’m not a big fan of high-stress situations. Fortunately it doesn’t happen all that often.

Do you get free horns? Any other cool perks?

Well, I don’t really need horns anymore. Whenever I have a gig, I just pick a horn off the shelf—maybe a prototype of a new design we’re testing, a new finish, or just whichever model I feel like playing that day. Or whichever one matches my outfit for the gig.

Does working with saxophones all day affect your motivation to play outside of work? How so?

Good question. Play testing only leaves so much room for actually making music, so more often than not it motivates me to go home and play more. Tevis has a nice setup in his home and records most evenings, testing out new models, new modifications, new mouthpieces, or just playing. Until I can set up my own studio, I go to jam sessions or play around at home. The only time I really get burned out is after a long trade show, where my ears are bombarded for days by deafeningly loud players all day long—that makes me crave silence.

How did you learn to do the acoustic customization? How long did it take to get good at it? Did you ruin a lot of necks or horns in the process?

Everything I learned about acoustic customization has been here under the Cannonball roof—a lot of it from Tevis and Randal, and a lot more we’ve discovered since. I had to practice for a few weeks on old prototypes and junk horns before I got the green light, but I didn’t ruin too many of them.

What kinds of things can you fix or improve about a saxophone through the acoustic customization process?

I’ll just say this: we have a lot of the top saxophonists in the world come through here, and so far, we’ve been able to make their horns do everything they’ve asked.

How long do you spend working on each horn?

It depends on the horn. We keep strict quality control at our factory so our products are exceptionally consistent; but no matter how tight our manufacturing tolerances are from an engineering standpoint, the horns will always vary in how they play. That’s why our acoustical customization is so important. Sometimes it only takes a few minutes, and sometimes I spend more than an hour on a horn before I’m satisfied. And it doesn’t leave until I’m satisfied.

Is the ultimate goal to create a totally consistent product—horns that all play the same way—or are you trying to create horns with a variety of playing characteristics?

When I’m working on an individual horn, my goal is to get it to fill its potential—to play as well as it can. So in that sense, yes, the goal is complete consistency. But from a design standpoint, the different models, necks, finishes, etc. provide varied flavors to fit musicians’ varied preferences. Most players recognize the “Cannonball sound” when they play any of our horns, but I still recommend playing as many as you can to find the one that fits you best.

Could you, theoretically, take a horn from another maker and improve it?

Absolutely—but I’d be fired pretty quickly if I did!

What horns are you currently playing?

Today I have a Vintage soprano in dark lacquer and a Brute Big Bell tenor checked out for upcoming performances. Last weekend it was a Raven alto and a black and silver tenor.

Were you playing Cannonball horns already when you were hired?

I owned a Cannonball Global Series soprano that I fell in love with at the store. I’d been playing the same tenor (not a Cannonball) since high school—it was a good horn, but you know what they say: “Good is great’s worst enemy.”

If you didn’t work for Cannonball, how likely is it that your current horns would be Cannonballs?

Very likely . . . I’ve always been drawn to big and rich sounds, and to “efficient” horns that don’t get in the way of my music. Cannonballs fit me well.

Do you secretly own and play non-Cannonball saxophones?

If I did, it sure wouldn’t be a secret anymore! I sometimes fix up and sell old horns for fun, and I’ve occasionally taken them to gigs. I’ve regretted it every time though, whether because of the awkward ergonomics, inefficient sound, bad intonation, or a terrible combination of those. But even the newer “big name” horns always make me feel choked, especially up in the palm keys.

Speaking of “old horns,” what’s your favorite?

Each of the ones I’ve played has certain features that stood out to me: the old Conns and Bueschers have a big but velvety sound; Martins tend to speak very easily; Buffet SDA has great intonation; Selmers have good ergonomics and a rich core sound. I guess the best all-around vintage sax I’ve played was a near-mint SBA tenor at a shop in Tokyo, but I didn’t have the $25k they were asking for it.

I know Cannonball is also making trumpets and clarinets. Are they as successful business-wise as the saxophones at this point? Is Cannonball likely to expand to other instrument lines?

We were doing saxophones almost a decade before we added trumpets, and the clarinets are only a couple years old now—they’re doing well, but the saxes got a big head start. The Lynx, our new lightweight trumpet model, is really taking off, and the clarinets are making good headway too. We’re always open to new ideas and have invested a lot into a couple of new instrument lines, but we won’t release them until they’re perfect and the market timing is right.

How much input do you have personally on new product development (if any)?

It’s a team effort, so I contribute a lot to sax development, whether with new models or improvements on existing ones. I don’t work much with the clarinets and trumpets, but I still pitch in—I made the ergonomic register key on our student clarinet, and helped make the unique braces on our Lynx trumpet.

Tell us about Cannonball’s new product development process.

It usually starts with one of us getting an idea. Tevis will frequently show up in the morning very excited with something new to try. We turn our ideas into prototypes here at our finishing factory. Then we’ll have a number of musicians try it out, and others listen (Sheryl has better ears than anyone I’ve met). Of course, most of the time the new idea doesn’t work—we have a huge “graveyard” of parts and horns—but that’s the nature of brainstorming. Every once in awhile we’ll love it and send the specs to our factory and build it. Then it goes through another series of more rigorous tests. Again, a lot of new designs are shot down during that process. If we still like it, we’ll usually build a few more prototypes just to make sure; and finally, if it passes all of those tests, it gets added to the next production run of horns. We have a lot of perfectionists here, so it takes quite awhile before we give anything the final approval.

Anything new on the horizon that you can tell us about?

Yes, a few new ideas are currently in the works. No, I can’t tell you about them. :)

Cannonball offers a wide range of finishes on its saxophones. Why?

The ideal sound and feel differs for every musician. Some want a big, fill-the-room type of sound. Others prefer a tight, focused tone. Some like it bright, some dark, and so on. Between our pro Big Bell and pro Vintage Series saxes and their varied finishes, there should be at least one model that hits the spot for every saxophonist.

How large a role does the finish play when you are picking out your personal horns?

It’s the icing on the cake, and when you’re picky, that makes a huge difference. I mean, you choose a particular horn because of a lot of things, but one of those is its sound. My numbers aren’t scientific, but I say 50% of your personal sound is determined by you (your body, your throat cavity, your mouth, your tongue, your embouchure, etc.); 35% your mouthpiece, reed, and ligature; 10% the sax neck; and 5% the sax. We’re talking just the sound—think long tones. And of that 5% that the sax determines, most of it is in the design—the bore, the tone holes placement and size, etc.—and finally, a small portion is the finish of the horn. That’s why I say it’s the icing on the cake. Maybe even just the sprinkles on top. Anyway, my point is, for most pro saxophonists, a 0.5% change to their sound is very significant, just the way 0.1 second would be a massive difference in Usain Bolt’s 200m time. Less advanced musicians won’t notice the difference. Some pros don’t. But to me, who spends all day playing the same models of horns, any tiny little change is a relatively huge deal, and the finish absolutely does make a difference in the sound. (People will argue that all day long, but remember that those people who spend all day arguing it aren’t spending much time playing their horns…) Anyway, to answer your question: when I’m picking among different finishes of the same model for my personal gigging horns, the finish plays a very significant role.

What are the most popular finishes?

Everybody loves the Raven. The Brute is the newest addition, and has quickly moved its way up the ladder—I think it might already be in second.

Should potential buyers be concerned about the Taiwanese manufacturing? We’ve all seen bad horns coming out of China or Taiwan. Any reason Cannonballs are different?

I can’t speak for anything else that’s coming out of Taiwan, but we’ve spent the past 15 years continually training our team in Taiwan and today our factory, processes, and artisans are second to none. We make all of our saxophones by hand in our Cannonball factory, and the Cannonball factory only makes Cannonball saxophones. From our brass alloy, our bore design, our tone hole sizing and placement, etc. to the fit and finish of everything on the horn, Cannonballs are both unique and built to last.

Do you find Cannonball saxophones to be particularly suited to certain styles of music? It seems that many of your endorsing artists play in a smooth jazz style, or something close to it.

Ever heard the joke, “How many classical saxophonists can you fit in a phone booth? All of them!” You’re right that a large number of our endorsers are in the smooth jazz genre. But when you look at professional performing saxophonists, the numbers represent the same spread as our artists. We have some excellent classical saxophonists on our team, but there just aren’t vey many of them out there. The market doesn’t support nearly as many straight-ahead jazz musicians as it used to—which is also a tragedy—so those artists make up a smaller slice of our pie. When you look at concert venues, churches, radio, media, etc., you just see a lot more smooth jazz artists than anything else these days. We’re proud that a relatively even representation of musicians from across the board find themselves at home on our horns.

Does Cannonball see itself as going head-to-head with “big” makers like Selmer and Yamaha in the pro saxophone market? Do you expect/hope to someday sell as many horns as they do (or more)?

You’d be surprised if you saw the numbers of how many pro horns we sell compared to those guys. When artists are picking out new horns, our biggest competition by far are horns that are over 50 years old. In general, our biggest hurdles are simply (1) name recognition and (2) the “if it costs more, it must be better” mindset. We encourage players do a fair side-by-side comparison between our horn and anything else.

Cannonball has an impressive artist roster. Any personal favorites or heroes?

I’ve of course listened to a lot of their recordings, but it’s a night-and-day difference hearing them play right in front of me. Pete Christlieb’s luscious sound will knock you over. Gerald Albright has ridiculous bebop chops. Nobody puts more air through the horn than Marc Russo (I thought I’d have to repaint my office after he left). Branford Marsalis has great classical chops and a wealth of knowledge.

Side note: not many people know that Cannonball doesn’t pay endorsers; in fact, all of our artists buy their own horns. We give them a great discount, but we never give horns away. We can proudly say our artists play Cannonballs because they truly want to.

How can people keep up on the latest news from Cannonball?

We post all the newest stuff on Facebook and Twitter, and educational and performance videos on YouTube.

Thanks, Ryan!

As promised, here’s the video of Ryan and the Cannonball crew doing their thing. All the soloists are worth hearing, but Ryan’s solo starts at about 3:40.

Similar Posts

  • Why musicians cost money

    I very much appreciate this brief article by trumpet player Jeff Purtle: Why Do Musicians Charge? [Edit: article no longer exists, but see the video in Mr. Purtle’s comment below.] Mr. Purtle makes the point that it costs a lot of money to be a musician. This is painfully true for woodwind doublers, who need not only a large number of high-quality instruments, but also reeds, maintenance and repairs, insurance, stands, cases, and more for each instrument, not to mention the cost of lessons or even college or conservatory study.

    I think the overhead costs of being an instrumentalist are a really important and valid point. But I do think are some more reasons why musicians should expect to be compensated fairly for what they do: Read More “Why musicians cost money”

  • |

    Teaching multiple instruments in higher education

    My academic credentials in multiple woodwind instruments have served me well so far: I was fortunate to be one among my graduating class who did get a college teaching job right out of school, and it’s a job that happens to be an excellent fit. Part of the reason it’s a great fit is because teaching multiple instruments is what I want to do, at least at this point; sometimes others assume that I’ve taken a multiple-woodwinds job as a stepping stone to something else, but that isn’t the case.

    While I thoroughly enjoy the variety in my day (I’m teaching oboe, clarinet, bassoon, and saxophone), there are some additional things worth considering if you take on multiple instruments in a collegiate teaching career. For example:

    • Resources allocated per faculty member sometimes get spread extra thin. When I arrived at my new job, I was given a little bit of funding for library acquisitions in my area. If I were teaching a single instrument, my current and future students would have benefited from all that money being spent on items directly relevant to them. Instead, I was able to get only a few items related to each instrument. My students, through no fault of their own, got fewer applicable new library resources.
    • Time also gets spread thin. We recently hosted a high school honor band on our campus as a recruiting event. At one point the visiting students were sent to masterclasses with the professors on their instrument, so I got all the reed players. It’s certainly not impossible to run a worthwhile masterclass in that situation, but the circumstances do complicate things a bit. The same problem exists with studio classes for my college students.
    • Some of the work multiplies. When we hold our ensemble auditions, I select audition excerpts and sightreading material for four instruments instead of one. When it’s time to submit textbook orders to the bookstore, I submit separate requests for each instrument’s separate batch of course numbers.
    • It is common for applied music professors to attend their professional organizations’ conferences annually, and to seek out officer positions in those organizations as a way to enhance their tenure portfolios. I would love to attend the annual conferences of the International Double Reed Society, the International Clarinet Association, and the North American Saxophone Alliance each year, but my limited travel funding and the potential time away from my teaching make this unrealistic. And since I don’t attend any one conference every year, it’s difficult to get taken seriously as an officer candidate.
    Photo, Trevor Hempfling Photography
    Photo, Trevor Hempfling Photography

    Not that I am complaining—I am grateful every day that I get to do what I love for a living, and most of these problems can be mitigated with a little effort and creativity. But I think they are worth knowing about if you see yourself headed for a career in college music teaching.

     

  • |

    Becoming a professional musician

    Sometimes when my students get paying engagements for the first time, I joke with them that they are now “professional” musicians. That’s true in a sense, but I think there’s more that goes into being a true professional.

    If you are a college student aspiring to be a professional musician, here are some things you might ask yourself:

    • Am I reliably on time to things?
    • Do I always have a pencil? Extra reeds? Whatever else is needed?
    • Do I show up to rehearsals with my parts learned and ready?
    • Am I self-motivating when it comes to practicing?
    • Am I pleasant and cooperative on a gig or in a rehearsal?
    • Am I easy to contact, and prompt about replying?
    • Is my closet stocked with clean, sharp gig apparel?
    • Do I keep my instruments well-maintained?
    • Do I have a sense of what my time and talents are worth, and a firm but polite way of expressing that?
    • Do I meet and exceed my teachers’ expectations?
    • Am I willing to play any part, including the less-prestigious ones? Am I willing to put my best into supporting someone else’s solo moment, even if I think that opportunity should have been mine?
    • Have I recorded myself lately? Did I come away from it with some ideas of what needs improvement?
    • What are the most common issues my teachers or ensemble directors mention about my playing? Am I addressing those in a focused way?
    • Am I responsive to useful criticism, thick-skinned against non-useful criticism, and able to tell the difference?
    • Is there anything about my playing or demeanor that would cause stress to someone who hired me for a gig? Am I currently stressing out my teachers, directors, or fellow students?

    Graduation from college doesn’t guarantee you any gigs. Become the person that other musicians want to work with.

  • Interview: Sarah Cosano, woodwind player and more

    Sarah Cosano is a busy working woodwind player (among other things). I initially reached out to Sarah about doing an interview because I was interested in her experiences with playing on cruise ships, but it turns out her musical experiences are quite varied. In 2000, Sarah was an MTNA National Competition winner, a featured performer on the NPR radio show From the Top, and an Emerson Scholar at the Interlochen Arts Camp. Since then she has performed with the Disneyland All American College Band, BLAST: Music in Xtreme, and the show Evolution in Japan. Her cruise ship playing has taken her around the world (Russia, Estonia, Fiji, New Zealand, Iceland, and the Caribbean). She is a bandleader, a freelancer, an educator, and a doctoral student in saxophone at the University of Nebraska–Lincoln. Sarah was kind enough to answer some questions about her career thus far. Read to the end for a video of Sarah doing her thing on flute, and be sure to check out her website for more performances.

    20140621_Ref_Music_0032_sm_mini
    photo, Rich Whitlow

    Tell us about your musical background.

    I grew up in a small town in rural Idaho, and really the only music I knew was through competitions. (My graduating class was 8 people, so band programs were non-existent!) My teacher kept me motivated by entering me in competitions. I loved the dedication it required to make pieces as perfect as possible.

    When I got into school at Duquesne in Pittsburgh, I was elated! Little did I know how much my life would change. Living in a larger city made it very clear to me that I didn’t have gig-worthy skills even when I was practicing 3+ hours a day. By the time I finished my undergraduate degree as a performance major, I knew something was missing. I moved back home and spent a few years working day jobs, saving up for instruments, and taking lessons on doubling and jazz. A couple of years later, I was on ships as a showband musician.

    Since then, my career has been eclectic. I love the university environment, the constant challenge to become better and all the available information. At the same time, I believe the “real world” deserves respect. It’s hard and unforgiving, and that’s what makes it great. I would say so far my life has been equal parts school and career musician. Between each degree I have taken a few years off to tour and try to balance my academic knowledge with the practical. I don’t regret one second of it.

    What education (formal or otherwise) and experience prepared you for what you do?

    Classical training is definitely useful for some things: technique, rhythm, tuning, and the basics of musicianship. I took lessons on each instrument from great teachers (clarinet lessons from a clarinet professor, etc.). The downside to the college education system is, often there is an expectation for virtuosic technique in just one skill set. That can inhibit students because they feel they don’t have time to diversify. And I think deep down we sometimes are afraid to be bad at something again.

    When I started gigging, I had to pick up skills from all kinds of sources. You never know what you can learn from someone, even non musicians. As a lounge singer on Celebrity, I got commentary about how I switch the microphone a lot while I sing (point taken/fixed!). When I played in a funk band, they wanted simple solos with more soul. I learned about networking, and really being a team player (for example, when you’re a sideman, your primary job is to meet the goals of the person who hired you). Even the showbiz aspect was picked up out there: learning how to create an environment and collaborate with other artists to create an interesting product.

    If you could do it over, is there anything you would have done differently to prepare for your current pursuits?

    Every step of the way, I have been really honest with myself. If I am doing a gig and feel that I am not being challenged enough, then I take it upon myself to find where the next step is for me. So with whatever knowledge I had at that point, I took it as far as I could. That translated to a lot of change in the past 10 years.

    Some would say it can also be a weakness, because I find myself getting to a certain level and then losing interest. It’s fun for me to pick up something completely new because the progress is so noticeable in the early stages. Where I am now, I wish I had taken some voice lessons and worked on double reeds so I’d be further along at this point, but I’m doing that now, so I don’t have regrets. Nobody plowed this path for me—I really had to work for it and I’m proud of that.

    Side note: I think it’s important to assess where you are regularly. I feel that jealousy and dissatisfaction can be healthy because we see that we need to stretch again, to make a change in our own life. We just have to keep pushing forward.

    What effects did youth/student-oriented music experiences like Interlochen, MTNA, From the Top, and the Disneyland All-American College Band have on your career development?

    You know, these were all different phases in my life. Competitions like MTNA are like musical Mount Everest. You have to do the opposite of woodwind doubling and focus on one main goal. The pieces need to be perfect. You have to be able to hear the music like your own voice, becoming one with it and committing if you want to win these things. It taught me how much deeper I could reach into the heart of one piece. But it takes everything. I don’t know if I could compete at that level with all the things I balance right now. I remember that Interlochen had chair challenges, where you would challenge the person above you every week in band. No slacking if you don’t want to be last chair!

    Competitions really have instilled in me a sense of how big the world is. Even if you are the top player in your school or town, there is someone out there who can run circles around you. I think if people really thought about that, they would work harder.

    Disneyland was a completely different experience, I got in as I was coming home to work on doubling and jazz. At first, I really failed at the movement while playing, it was so hard! This summer was so different from what I had been taught in school. It was a place where jazz, doubling, and showbiz were everything, and perfection was not important. The people I worked with in this band have all gone on to some incredible careers, I’m proud to know them all.

    Most importantly with the Disneyland experience, one guy that I worked with on this gig recommended me for BLAST and, after sending a demo, I got in on the Japan tour. Then from that tour, another person I met on BLAST recommended me for Evolution. So really Disneyland catapulted me on a crazy ride to some great gigs. Luckily the dancing part got easier!

    How did you get started playing on cruise ships?

    Cruise ships are a lot less who you know. There are many agencies out there, and if you’re lucky, you can work direct with the company. Agents usually take a 7–12% cut from each month’s salary, and they have clauses that renew for a few years after each contract. They are cruise-line-specific, so if you have an agent with Holland, you can still go direct with Royal if you get the contact info. Downside: working direct with head office takes a lot of time to get a hold of people. If you want quick or fill in work, an agent is a better way to go.

    I kind of went in blind because I didn’t know much about working on ships. I auditioned for an agent and got a gig a month later. I’ve worked with a few agents, but our last contract as a lounge band was direct with head office. For showband,  they send you charts an hour or less in advance and you print them out. Then they call you on a landline and you video record the audition. Afterwards, you send the files to them, and they do the video editing and get you a gig. They usually ask for sight reading of a show with tracks and some basic soloing. And they’ll definitely test you on flute and clarinet.

    What is day-to-day life like for a cruise musician? What is the best part? What is the worst part?

    Typically for showband you will have a rehearsal in the am and then play two shows at night. There also are other sets, like captain’s cocktail (swing big band music) and possibly theme sets. What company you work for has a huge part in how your life is going to be. On Holland, we played 5 hours a day every day, split between Top 40 music and tracked shows (they recently dropped the sax from the instrumentation, the last surviving horn!) Most other companies are lighter. I would say the average work is around 3 hours.

    Shows will typically be a couple of production shows with cast singers and dancers (most companies are going the route of tracks these days, and the band has to play with a click track). Then you’ll have a fly-on guest entertainer a couple times a cruise where you read the show in the morning and play it that night. That really helps with sight reading. Lately some companies (Princess) have cut the second sax part, so they ask you to bring tenor, alto, clarinet, and flute out there.

    About the lifestyle. There are important factors to consider. For example, IPM, or in port manning means you have to stay on the ship to “protect it” even if you aren’t working. Some companies like Holland had a heavy rotation, every 3-4 days, but Celebrity was once every 3 months or so. And FOOD! Companies vary on whether you can eat upstairs with passengers or not. Believe me, crew food can be brutal. You’ll be sleeping in bunk beds with a roommate, likely a guy from the band. And you will need to have some degree of safety duties. So you want to think about these things when you consider a ship gig.

    One good thing is I paid off all my student loans with ships! You can really save because you don’t have to pay rent or buy food. I also travelled all over the world and meet some incredible, adventurous people. We went to Australia, Fiji, Greenland, Alaska, Caribbean, Russia, Norway, Hawaii, Italy, Spain, etc., for free. I also met my husband from Argentina working on ships. Professionally, I had time to really work on my doubling and grow as a musician.

    Still, living can become a drag after awhile because ships really have a corporate aspect to them. If a cruise director wants you playing to an empty bar that is not open at 11 am while the ship docks in Rome, you will be doing that. Also, you don’t really have control over the music or the musicians that you are playing with, so it can be really great… or it can stink. Many people on ships work 13-14 hours a day for very little wage so there can be some jealousy towards the entertainment department. Some companies have been pushing the limits to what musician contracts delineate. I was recently on a ship that assigned musicians check in duties at 6:00 AM every week. There has been push back, but I don’t know if the gig is going to keep going this way. It has changed a lot even in the past 10 years.

    What advice would you give to a musician who wants to play on cruise ships? for BLAST? shows like Evolution?

    To get onboard: practice your doubles, practice your reading, get used to improv (rhythm changes and blues is usually enough for starters), and work on getting a clear, solid jazz sound. I don’t think you will have any problem getting on if you have these skills ready to go.

    Once you get there, explore the destinations, and take advantage of this time. For most people, you’ll never get to see the world like this again. Musically, go in there and learn everything that you can. If there is anything that you don’t know how to do, work your butt off and fix it! Also, don’t underestimate the people around you because they can make your life easier, especially in a ship situation. Make friends because you don’t know who’s connected to who. At some point, you will have learned everything that you can get from this gig, and you may began to feel stuck in one place. Don’t become one of those musicians who kept doing the same thing because they’re afraid of moving—find that next step!

    BLAST and Evolution sometimes feel to me like luck. But I think they are lessons in basic networking. These aren’t advertised gigs, they are people knowing people. You have to get your foot in the door somehow, and then things will open up. Also, I should point out that my main instrument is saxophone, but for Evolution I barely played that. It helped to be versatile on a few instruments. My main job there was a flute feature while dancing. So really work hard on making each instrument sound as legit as possible, because you may be hired primarily as one of those, and you have to step up to that.

    Several of your performance experiences (BLAST, Evolution, the Disney College Band) include movement and dance. Do you enjoy that part of it, or is it just a necessary part of getting to play music? Do you have abilities/experience in these areas that has given you an advantage over other musicians who might have wanted those performing opportunities?

    I love it! I love being on stage and being a ham, so that’s really fun. Of course, movement was hard at first. In BLAST, I would come to the hotel every night and put the iPod on in the gym, going through the movements while singing my part. You have to time the movements of big muscles with the small muscles. We also had a part where we used pogo balls and jumped on trampolines while we played, so that took practice. I still am more stiff when performing than I would like to be, probably because I only took dance as a kid and it is hard to keep good air support while jumping in the air.

    Players who do marching band would definitely have an advantage at BLAST, and that is something I wished I had when I was growing up. If you haven’t had formal dance training, movement while playing can still be done. You just have to practice it just like you would an instrument.

    What part has teaching played in your career? What part do you see it playing in the future?

    I really enjoy teaching, especially because I have had to teach myself a lot of things over the course of my career. Another plug for doubling, when I lived in Austin there was not much need of saxophone teachers, so most of my students were middle school clarinetists. That’s an advantage to being a doubler. Wherever you are, you can find a place for yourself among all the other professionals in your area. I would like to teach at the college level, because I feel comfortable in this environment and like to boil things down to a practical level. I’m not a very abstract person. I want my students to be empowered to really achieve things and I also want them to know how to think on their feet and create opportunities for themselves. Looking back, my career has been pretty cool so far, but anybody can do the same thing if they take some risks.

    What part has YouTube and other online presence played in your career and development?

    I only set up a website this past summer. For a long time, I used YouTube and Myspace for all my promo materials. It wasn’t very organized, but if I wanted a gig I could send links to the specific videos. It’s important to have information online so people can “spy” on you. Now that I book more gigs with my band, the first thing I do before hiring someone is internet search them. It’s a shame how many great players do not have material available. How can I know they are good for our gig if I can’t hear them?

    A few years ago, I started putting instructional videos up. I really should do more. It takes effort to get them online. It’s been crazy how many more people come to my channel now! I’ve picked up a few Skype students this way—they will see the video, check out my website, and then go from there. Another part of this is that there is some misinformation there on YouTube. If I can combat it a little of that, then I’ve done something good for the world.

    You do non-woodwind things like singing and playing keyboards. Do those things affect or inform your woodwind playing? How? Would your career to this point have turned out differently if you were strictly a woodwind player?

    I got into singing when I realized how much better the gig is if you can sing! I also like to front bands, and truthfully was getting bored just playing short lines on sax. Singing is a totally different world. Words, meaning, acting, and connection with the audience are all supremely important. It’s still hard for me to disconnect from mechanics and really convey the song’s meaning. I think this is something that we as instrumentalists often miss, just the simplicity of emotion and the importance of audience-performer connections.

    I played piano in high school, but I have gotten really rusty. If I had more time, I’d like to do more jazz piano because it would be cool to be able to accompany myself on a solo gig. But I just can’t find time for it right now. Playing keys on that one cruise contract made me very aware of a mindset difference—as a sax player I play a lick and then hang out. But with piano, you are always there as part of the rhythm section. You really need stamina and a focus towards the people around you, more so than when you’re playing horn. Having some piano skills has also been nice for accompanying students. My career has been mainly woodwinds, but piano is useful when arranging things, and working on singing exercises.

    Do you identify as a “doubler?” Is it your intention to play all your instruments equally well, or are there one or more that you would prefer to focus on?

    I tend to focus on whatever gig I’m working towards. Its hard to juggle 5+ instruments all the time equally. If it is 3 or more that I need to keep in shape, I rotate instruments with 45 minute practice sessions and I try to get 2-3 hours in a day.

    I began as a saxophonist, and that instrument is the easiest for me. It’s what I primarily get gigs with too. But I want to make them as equal as I can. Another caveat, don’t let other people define you. They may see what you are, but only you know where you’re going. At the beginning of every phase (or instrument) in my career, pretty much nobody believed in me. And probably for good reason, because I’m sure I didn’t sound very good! But I practiced my way out of it. I wasn’t going to stay in that place long.

    Do you have any favorite woodwind doubling tips?

    I know this is common advice, but get rid of the concept of a “doubler” as soon as you can. Whenever I pick up an instrument, I say to myself, I am now a [insert instrument here] player. With flute, I work really hard to match the embouchure to full-time flutists. Don’t take fingering shortcuts— if clarinetists don’t slide their pinkies, don’t form that habit yourself! You have to also hear notes in a different way, the airstream and the shaping inside your mouth will change depending on what instrument you are performing on. Listen to recordings of great players and try to internalize it so it will come out correctly.

    We’re really lucky to play multiple instruments. If you can get past the initial feeling of frustration trying to make sounds come out (I sometimes call it the 40-year-old in a 10-year-old body syndrome), you’ll see there is a real advantage to the speed with which we learn things. You already know rhythms, tuning, and many aspects of technique that will cross apply to whatever instrument you are playing.

    What instruments do you consider part of your current professional toolbox? What musical styles? Are there others you are working on or would like to add at some point?

    • Alto, tenor, soprano sax
    • Bari sax
    • Flute
    • Clarinet
    • Singing
    • Piccolo
    • Piano
    • Bassoon (just started lessons this semester!)
    • Classical
    • Jazz
    • Pop/Rock/R&B
    • Reading gigs

    I have a whole list of instruments that I would buy if I won the lottery!! A better-quality piccolo, my own bari sax, bass clarinet, alto flute, and bassoon. I’m also aiming to take oboe lessons next fall. For a long time, I was wary of double reeds, but bassoon has broken the ice for me. It’s been a lot of fun and I’m enrolled for another semester come January.

    I saw some very cool electronic things that musicians were doing on ships on my last contract, and I may someday try to figure out basics of DJing. Not top-40 style, but actually creating electronic patches as music. So much to learn, so little time.

    What projects are you working on now?

    My jazz group Cambia (formerly Off the Record) is releasing our debut CD on December 11. We’ll have songs online via iTunes, Amazon, and all those great places before Christmas. I play tenor, alto, flute, clarinet, and I have a vocal cameo in the last track so it’s a doubler’s dream. The music is original compositions by myself and my husband (a guitar player). We’re hoping to take this project on the road to a few places next year, so if you stay tuned to my website I will keep updates rolling there.

    Do you have time for other interests, hobbies, etc?

    I wish! I used to guide rafting tours and I went snowboarding a lot when I lived on the West Coast. I miss it sometimes, but living here in Nebraska makes those hobbies difficult. At this point, I pretty much just do music stuff and follow news and politics obsessively. I like cats. Does that count?

    Thank you, Sarah, for taking the time to share your thoughts and experiences!

  • What should be on your musician website

    It’s cheap and easy to create a website. Any serious freelance musician (or aspiring musician) should have one.

    This should be a website about you, an individual musician. It should be separate from your ensemble’s website or your academic institution’s website. It should exist long-term, and serve as a sort of permanent address for finding you online. If you do most of your online stuff on social media sites or on your organizations’ sites, that’s fine. Your individual website doesn’t have to replace or duplicate any of that. It can simply point people to those resources.

    I won’t go into any technical details here, because there is very extensive information available online about the ways to make websites. Suffice it to say that if you have only enough technical skill to send and receive email and post things on Facebook, there are website services simple enough for you to operate. Or if you want to roll up your sleeves and code every line from scratch, you can learn how to do that too.

    Here’s what you need, content-wise:

    Mandatory items

    • A domain name. Preferably this is something very simple and clear, like your name. Mine is bretpimentel.com. It works well because there aren’t a lot of Bret Pimentels, so web searches for my name usually put my site right at the top of the results.
      • If you have a more common name, you might need to add something meaningful to it. bretpimentelwoodwinds.com might work well, or bretpimentelmusic.com.
      • Pay for a real domain name. It’s not expensive. Something like bretpimentel.freewebsites.com looks unprofessional.
    • At minimum, a simple indication of what it is you do and how to contact you. That’s enough to be your whole website if you like. Here’s an example: “Bret Pimentel is a performer and teacher on the woodwind instruments: flute, oboe, clarinet, bassoon, and saxophone. Reach him at bret@bretpimentel.com.”
    • Some longevity. Go ahead and prepay the domain name and whatever hosting services you need for a good long time, maybe five or ten years, or set it up to renew automatically.

    Optional items

    • A more detailed biography.
    • A nice picture of you, especially one that helps reinforce what you do (like one where you’re holding your instrument).
    • Links to your social media profiles, YouTube channel, or other online things you want people to find.
    • Links to the websites of things associated with your career, like your performing ensembles or the institutions where you teach.

    Optional items with caveats

    Most of these things have to do with updating the content of your site on some kind of regular basis. That’s worth doing if your intention is to bring people back to visit your site again in the future. If you prefer to use your site as just sort of a digital business card, with no updating content, that’s fine too, and is much less effort to maintain.

    • A calendar of your upcoming performances. Only do this if you are thoroughly dedicated to keeping it up to date. An expired calendar makes your website look abandoned.
    • Recordings (audio and/or video) of some of your performances.
      • If you are hoping your website will help you get hired for things, only include recordings that you think appropriately and honestly reflect your current abilities.
      • Only post material you are certain you have the rights to post. For most individual-musician websites, chances are slim that anyone will take legal action against you for posting copyrighted material, but it’s still decent and polite to respect others’ intellectual property. (Acknowledging your non-ownership doesn’t make it okay to post something that isn’t yours. The copyright owner has to specifically give you permission or license the material to you in some way.)
    • A blog and/or some articles or other resources.
      • Again, this should be your own intellectual property or something you have explicit permission to post.
      • If you start a blog, start with a post that is about something, not a post about how you intend to start blogging soon, or asking people for ideas what to blog about. Lots of blogs start that way, with a single post promising big things to come, and then nothing more ever.
      • You don’t have to blog on any particular schedule if you don’t want to, just post when you have something to say.

    Don’t include these

    • Lists of who you have played with, unless they are significant and career-defining.
      • As a graduate student I got to play at a university event honoring Dave Brubeck, including playing in an ensemble “with” him. For years my professional biography indicated that I had played with Dave Brubeck, even though after the one gig was over he almost certainly wouldn’t have remembered me, much less considered me some kind of collaborator. Listing him on my website was a pretty transparent inflation of the truth. (If he had hired me to join his quartet and go on the road for a few years, that would definitely be worth mentioning on my site.)
      • There have also been many less-famous names I have performed with, and why list those?
    • Lists of the equipment you use. One possible exception is if you have official endorsement deals that contractually require you to include this information. Otherwise, what is the list for? To prove how much money you have spent? To encourage others to blindly buy the same products as you?
    • “Links” lists, except in the rare case that your curation brings something valuable to the table. Lists of sites that you think are interesting or somehow related to your site are an artifact of earlier days of the web. Now if people want to find sites related to a topic, they just do a web search or follow related entities on social media.
    • Gratuitous photo albums, unless there’s a good reason to post them. Being attractive and/or vain isn’t a good reason, if you are hoping people will focus on what you have to offer musically. And you do need permission from the copyright holder.

    A simple website is part of the modern musician’s professional face—you need one the same way you need a phone number, an email address, and black clothes for the gig. You can start for a few dollars and finish in less than an hour, or spend years building it into a powerful communication outlet. Get started today!

  • Interview: flutist Tammy Evans Yonce

    Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases, at no cost to you.

    Flutist Tammy Evans Yonce is an active recitalist, writer, clinician, speaker, contributor to various conferences and professional organizations, and professor at South Dakota State University (plus: she is my former classmate). Her thoughtful blog is a favorite of mine and my regular readers will recall that I have featured her posts on a number of occasions. Her debut CD will be released earlier next year—keep an eye on her website and Twitter for details.

    I am always particularly amazed by her brutally busy performance schedule, and she kindly agreed to let me pick her brain about it.

    How often do you perform?

    I do an annual fall tour, which includes multiple performances and masterclasses. This year it was to Virginia, North Carolina, and Tennessee. Sometimes I choose these places because it’s a geographical area I want to explore or because I have friends and collaborators there. This year’s tour included collaborations with some really fantastic friends. I’ve been able to perform in 24 states so far, so that’s been fun.

    I always give one on-campus recital each year but also frequently collaborate with colleagues on theirs.

    Other performances include festivals, conventions, and such. I like giving 15–20 performances per year.

    How do you maintain such a busy performance schedule, on top of teaching full time, having a family, etc.?

    It mainly comes down to organization and clearly defined goals. And making consistent progress every day. I work in big six-month chunks, where I have goals listed in a variety of categories (performance, writing, recording, commissions, etc.). Those goals help me organize my day-to-day decisions, and they also allow me to stretch beyond what I think I’m capable of.

    I have some general long-term goals but I think the nature of my work (music + academia) means that I can’t anticipate all opportunities that might arise, so I try not to be too rigid about those long-term plans. My upcoming fellowship to Israel came out of left field, for example, so I try to keep my eyes open.

    I also have a really supportive husband who carries his share (plus some, probably) at home so I have some flexibility.

    How does your performance schedule affect you? What benefits or drawbacks are there to a busy performance calendar?

    I enjoy travel and find it invigorating. It helps me to break up my schedule, see new people and places, and be in a different environment, and it certainly helps my teaching. I enjoy collaborating with friends.

    Performing frequently has effectively eliminated performance anxiety for me. There’s just not time to be nervous and I have a lot of hours banked actually on the stage. I’ve “practiced” performing so much that I can stay in the moment. Since creation and analysis are completely different processes, if I can stay in the moment I’m not worried about analyzing my performance as it happens.

    Being busy might be considered a drawback for some but I feel like the things I do are a worthwhile use of my time. I don’t do things just to have something to do.

    How do you maintain balance in your career and life?

    I have a couple of trusted people who understand me and my goals that I check in with regularly. We make sure that we’re staying on track. Also, I don’t check work email after 5pm or on the weekends.

    Do you have any self-care or stress-reduction practices?

    I get regular massages. I used to see this as a luxurious indulgence but being a musician does take a physical toll. I like good food, I travel as much as I can, and I try to work with my friends whenever possible. Finally, I read a lot. I read at least 25 books a year.

    You frequently commission new works. How do you connect with and select composers?

    Sometimes I’m approached by composers who hear me play and have an idea of something they’d like to write. Other times there are composers I know I’d love to work with, and I approach them. Most of these connections happen either online (Twitter, usually) or at conferences and festivals. Even if I haven’t met a composer, it’s likely that I’ve seen them around online or have mutual friends, so there’s usually a connection.

    Generally I work with the composer during the compositional process. We meet via Skype or FaceTime so I can try out their ideas or they send sketches as the piece progresses, so I have a good idea of what the piece is before it’s done. The composers I work with want things to work, so if something is awkward or impractical, we find a solution.

    You have done some performing and commissioning with the Glissando Headjoint. How does this play into your career? Is it bringing you opportunities that you wouldn’t have otherwise? Does it cause you to be pigeonholed?

    The Glissando Headjoint has been a lot of fun. I don’t think it has helped or hindered me. I see it as another item in the toolkit I can use to get the musical message across. Since there isn’t much repertoire for it, it has been fascinating to see how composers use it. They are really drawing from their own creativity instead of basing their musical decisions on existing repertoire.

    When programming, how do you balance new repertoire with previously-performed works?

    Big considerations are the audience, the logistics of the performing venue, and whether or not I have collaborators available.

    My recitals have taken a big turn lately and are much more logistically complex. Last month’s recital featured dancers, lines of poetry projected in real time, a lithograph displayed during one piece, multiple collaborators, and a variety of equipment changes. While it was complex, I think it was effective.

    I’m already planning next year’s recital, which will involve literature, readings, photographs and other visual art, and several new commissions. Once I get the plans in place, I’ll put more info on my website. I like the impact of a cohesive recital that involves more than just the ears.

    Do you have any favorite flute-playing tips?

    Practice. You can’t go wrong with lots of etudes and Taffanel and Gaubert.


    Thanks, Tammy, for taking the time to answer some questions! Find her at:

2 Comments

  1. Thank you for the post. It answered many questions I had about the new cannonball instruments. I can personally say that when I buy a new horn cannonball will seriously be in contention.

    1. I enjoyed the interview with Ryan
      I have played a Selmer Super Action 80 Tenor that was hand picked for me since I was in HighSchool in 1981. I’ve put a million hours on that horn in 40 years and never thought any sax could top it until I happen to play a Cannonball Raven Tenor while in A music store in Atlanta . I was in no way in the market for a saxophone that day. I had been at a gig the night before and still had my Selmer in the car . I compared my Selmer Back to Back with the Cannonball Tenor and was just amazed by it. The notes seemed to pop out before I even fingered them so responsive and the tone flexibility was better than any sax I’d ever played and the biggest fullest richest sound ever. I bought that horn on the spot. Used the money earmarked for 2 mortgage payments lol . I just had to have it . I haven played my Selmer much since. It’s difficult to sell something I’ve spent that much time with but 2 years later I’m about to list my Super Action 80 for sale. It’s an amazing horn but the Cannonball Just was crazy great for all the Rock and Fusion I play these days. I used to do a lot of classical quartet work and my Selmers centered dark rich round sound worked so well it that but I’m convinced with the right mouthpiece the Cannonball would fall right inline for a classical gig now and then .
      Thanks Ryan I have enjoyed your music as well as your work at Cannonball music. Keep up the good work 👍
      Ron Hendon

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments that take a negative or confrontational tone are subject to email and name verification before being approved. In other words: no anonymous trolls allowed—take responsibility for your words.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.