Ideas for directing student jazz bands

The following is a summary of lessons learned from observing rehearsals of jazz big bands. A great debt is owed here to Dr. Ray Smith of Brigham Young University, director of the Synthesis big band.

A picture is worth a thousand words

The student jazz group should be exposed to recordings (or, when possible, live performances), especially of the arrangements they are learning. This benefits the band in several ways:

First, the band members further absorb general concepts, such as swing feel, sense of time, and concept of tone, as well as bits of jazz “vocabulary” (melodic, harmonic, and rhythmic ideas, for example). These concepts, no matter how clearly explained, can only really be learned by listening and imitating—like learning the correct accent for a foreign language.

Secondly, band members can look to musical role models for interpretive ideas. A young drummer, for example, might listen to where a professional drummer “kicks” the big band horn section, or when he uses brushes instead of sticks, or what kind of pattern he uses for a certain kind of tune. The lead alto player might notice where his professional counterpart places scoops, or the width of his vibrato, or the length of a certain note.

Third, and perhaps most importantly, the energy and polish of a professional performance will inspire young musicians to greater achievements of their own. To give a student a hero is to give him or her a lifetime goal.

Lay ground rules

A young band needs a set of general principles they can apply to a new piece. Having a set of simple rules for swing, articulation, note length, dynamics, and so forth can ensure a band’s success even upon the first reading of a new chart.

These principles should be established firmly through discussion and specific practice, and consistently reaffirmed with simple reminders. For example, a director might help the lead trumpet player to set the precise length of a quarter note on an upbeat, have him or her repeat it several times until satisfactory, then invite the rest of the section to match it. Once the trumpet section can play consistently, other sections can be added in. Individuals who “stick out” may need to be made aware that they are not matching the rest of the group.

Of course, any set of “rules” on how to play music is subject to exceptions, differences in personal taste, contradictions, and other glaring flaws. But a frame of reference is essential to understanding the variations. Once a set of principles is firmly established in a student’s mind, he or she will be equipped to deal with discrepancies, and, ultimately, made educated decisions about the principles to be used in their own playing and teaching. For example, a well-trained student band might notice that a professional band holds their long notes just a little longer before cutting off—a distinction that would certainly be lost on a band that never thinks about how long to hold their own long notes.

Each new chart should be approached from the standpoint of established ground rules, and the inevitable exceptions should be dealt with using common sense, musical taste, recordings, and pencil marks in individual parts.

Follow the leader

Interpretation of a musical work involves hundreds of small stylistic decisions. Of necessity, a sort of “pecking order” (for lack of a better term) emerges for stylistic decision-making.

Section leaders in the brass and saxophone sections are ultimately in charge of their sections’ styles. A smart section leader, however, will welcome input from other members of the section. Smart section members will, in turn, accept the leaders’ decisions and support them fully for the sake of unity. In the rhythm section, natural leadership roles may be less clear. In some cases, it may be necessary to appoint a section leader in the rhythm section.

When the horns play together in ensemble, the saxophone and trombone sections should generally defer to the lead trumpet player as leader of the horn “section.” Smaller ensemble passages within the horns are usually led by the highest voice. For example, a melody played by the tenor and baritone saxophones should be led by the first tenor; a melody played by alto saxophone and trombone will usually be led by the alto.

The director reserves the right to override any stylistic choices, but ideally his or her role is that of an impartial set of ears, pointing out balance problems or other items that might not be immediately apparent to band members.

Auditioning band members

Auditions for a student jazz band should be geared towards assembling the best overall band, rather than assembling a group of the best individuals. Include section playing in auditions, and look and listen for strong, confident, consistent section leaders. Try moving players to different parts and pay close attention to the effects on balance and cohesion. Plan on reassigning solos as desired, so that soloing ability won’t interfere with putting together the strongest section. For example, if the best saxophone soloist in the group makes the best section contribution on second tenor, put her in the second tenor chair and give her a few of the solos that were originally written into the first tenor part.

Audition evaluations should be designed around the factors most important to the band. In a jazz band situation, intonation and sight reading ability might deserve more weight than, say, having all twelve major scales memorized. Other important factors will likely include solid time feel, stylistic authenticity, ability to “fill up the horn,” and improvisation skills. In some situations, it may also be necessary to consider students’ personalities and behavior.

Using rehearsal time

Rehearsals should be goal-oriented. Plan to achieve certain things, and set aside adequate time to accomplish each one. Focus on problem spots; resist the urge to “just play it again from the beginning.” If the band is allowed to rehearse mistakes, they will certainly play them in performance.

Set aside a portion of each rehearsal to work specifically on the band’s long-term development. This time might be used to teach music theory, to practice sightreading, or to listen to and discuss recordings together. Don’t get so concerned about next month’s concert that you allow the band’s growth to stagnate.

Use common sense in setting the pace of the rehearsal. Insist on progress, but don’t burn the band out. Be sensitive to the band’s needs: a few minutes to rest lips or a quick trip to the drinking fountain may save the band’s morale and salvage the rest of a long rehearsal.

Dealing with intonation and time

Many problems will solve themselves if brought to the band members’ attention. A young band might not notice intonation problems at first; show them with an electronic tuner or piano, or help them to hear “beats” in out-of-tune unisons. Get students “bugged” about intonation and it will improve significantly.

Use a metronome (or your drummer, if he’s reliable) to show the horns where they are rushing or dragging the tempo. Build a strong pulse in the rhythm section by insisting on precise coordination of the drummer’s ride cymbal with the bassist’s walking bass line. Strip the pulse down to bare essentials—quarter notes in the ride cymbal and the bass. When that is solid, more complex rhythm can be permitted, but must not interfere with the quarter-note pulse. Teach the band to play all rhythms as quarter notes, treating the in-between eighth notes as pickups to the next downbeat.

Selecting material

Choosing charts for the band to play may be the director’s most important job. Charts should be fun, should encourage musical growth, and should expand students’ knowledge of the jazz tradition.

Assembling a book that is fun for the band to play will depend on the band’s level and interests. Charts should be difficult enough to challenge the band, but not so difficult as to be overly frustrating. A band whose members are not as familiar with jazz music might find rock-oriented charts more appealing at first. Charts of familiar songs can be an effective way to bridge the gap to more “serious” jazz charts. Playing charts with a good variety of styles, tempi, etc., will also decrease the boredom factor.

Charts can aid the band’s musical development by creating demands on the students’ technical abilities or by raising questions about style and interpretation. Carefully-selected charts can be used to challenge specific technical abilities—a relatively simple tune in an uncommon key, for example, or one with difficult articulation. A chart in a style unfamiliar to the band might push the brass to match note length more carefully, or might require the rhythm section to learn an appropriate style of comping from a recording.

Charts should also expand students’ knowledge of jazz by exposing them to standard tunes, introducing famous or important arrangements, and teaching the styles of the influential big bands.

Similar Posts

  • A jazz improvisation curriculum: Junior high through college

    The following is a suggested curriculum for teaching jazz style and improvisation to students from junior high school through college. The materials listed are geared toward the developing saxophonist, but may be substituted or adapted to meet needs of other instrumentalists. The curriculum assumes the student has a basic command of the instrument, and should be used in conjunction with classical study. The layout of the curriculum suggests materials for junior high, high school, and college, but will of course need to be altered to fit each individual student’s needs. Read More “A jazz improvisation curriculum: Junior high through college”

  • How I use my undergraduate core music curriculum every day

    My university students are sometimes unconvinced of the value of their core music curriculum. Like most music programs, the core at my school includes music theory, applied theory (aural skills like sight-singing and dictation, and piano/keyboard skills), and music history. Most of my students will be educators, like I am (most of them will teach music at a middle or high school level). Here is just a small handful of the ways that, as a teacher, I use my undergraduate music skills on a daily basis.

    Manuscript paper
    Photo, Andrew Malone
    • Evaluating student performances (aural skills, theory, history). Sometimes when I pick out a wrong note in a student’s performance, they express amazement that I have so much music “memorized.” I don’t. But I can follow the score and tell when what I’m hearing doesn’t match.
    • Preparing lectures, presentations, program notes, and so forth (theory, history). What makes this repertoire piece, this composer, this technique, this performance practice important? Context is crucial.
    • Selecting appropriate repertoire (history, theory). A good student recital or ensemble concert needs to balance the students’ educational needs and the audience’s attention span. And even once the repertoire is chosen, a broad-based musical education is key to differentiating between published editions.
    • Arranging, adapting, transposing, and transcribing music for soloists or ensembles (theory, aural skills, keyboard skills). This can be elaborately creative or simply functional. But every working musician and music educator at least needs to be able to take a given piece of music and make it work for a different instrumentation, taking into account instrument ranges, chord voicing, and balance.
    • Making and communicating interpretive decisions (theory, history). Good interpretive decision-making can mean following the “rules” with strictness, or making informed decision to bend or break those rules. Understanding the canon—insofar as one exists—of performance practices, and having the vocabulary to discuss them with precision, helps tremendously in either case.
    • Demonstrating musical effects for students/ensembles (theory, aural skills, keyboard skills). Good music teachers don’t let the instrument(s) collect dust, even if their primary outlet is as a conductor. Music is an aural tradition, and a “picture” is worth a thousand words. (“Instruments” in this situation includes the voice, for singers and non-singers alike.)

    That list is teaching-focused; as a performer I use all of those skills just as much, if not more. Study hard!

  • Do I need a college degree for my instrumental music career plans?

    • Classical or jazz solo artist, chamber/orchestral/theater musician, jazz big band or small group musician, studio musician. None of these “require” a college degree, just very fine playing. But these are lofty goals for making your primary living—very few people, even among the most talented and hardworking, are able to achieve them. But college study can help you develop the skills, the discipline, and the professional network that might get you there. And a college degree that you can fall back on for other employment might be a smart move.
    • Musician in “popular” styles (such as rock, blues, hip-hop, country, and many more). Even if you wish to study these in college, there currently aren’t a lot of options. But some classical or jazz training in a band or orchestral instrument, widely available at universities, will deepen and expand your musical understanding in general, and sometimes present valuable opportunities.
    • Public school music teacher. Yes: in most cases you will need a bachelor’s degree in music education.
    • University music teacher. Yes: in most cases you will need a doctoral degree in something related fairly precisely to the job you are applying for. (Some job listings list a masters degree as a minimum, but even for an adjunct or community-college position, you may well be applying against candidates with doctorates.)
    • Private music teacher, from home or small business. You probably won’t need the degree in order to set up shop, but depending on your local market and your reputation it may be an advantage in attracting students and giving them quality instruction.

    While college study may not be the right choice for every instrumentalist, it’s hard to beat for a well-rounded musical education (with performance study, music theory, music history, and more), plus life skills, networking, and enhanced employability in the general job market.

  • Mindset shifts for college music majors

    Here are some mindsets that I find can hold college music majors back from reaching their potential—or can launch them to the next level.

    From “This is how I was taught” to “I’m here to explore new ideas.

    I can’t tell you how many times I’ve suggested a better fingering option to a student who resists because they already know a different fingering and would rather not have to remember a new one. But my most successful students are curious to learn new things and try them out. Someday you’ll have the option to choose your own path, but you’ll do so from a place of experience, not habit.

    From “I have to practice for hours” to What can I get done in ten minutes?

    Mastery takes time, but the quality of that time is what really gets results. I’ve had students suffer alone in practice rooms all week with nothing to show for it. But if they can set a few small goals and spend a few minutes pursuing each of them in a focused way, by their next lesson they have measurable progress, the confidence to show it off, and a grade that reflects it.

    From “I’m never going to use this” to “I’m building a versatile skill set.”

    My students often have very clear ideas about what they will and won’t be doing in their careers. But working in music and/or education can mean wearing a lot of different hats, and broad knowledge and experience can have surprising advantages.

    From “My teacher my is judge and executioner” to “My teacher is on this journey with me.”

    Rather than playing your assignment for your teacher and nervously waiting for a verdict, let your teacher be a guide and consultant. Be ready to outline and demonstrate your successes and frustrations from the week, and ask for help and advice on what’s holding you back. It’s not you versus your teacher—it’s the two of you versus the technical and musical challenges.

    From “I don’t play well enough to perform in front of others” to I have something to share.”

    My students perform frequently for other music majors, for faculty, and for public audiences. It’s pretty normal to feel inadequate to the task or to feel outclassed by others. But our audiences, even when they are our peers or teachers, want us to succeed. If you see your performance as a gift rather than a test, you never know who you might impress, inspire, or uplift.

    Which of these mindset shifts feels the most uncomfortable to you? Often the one that scares us the most is the one that offers the biggest breakthrough. Let’s do this!

  • Is jazz swing triplety, or not?

    The most important rhythmic concept in jazz is swing, an intentional unevenness of note lengths. In jazz swing, downbeat notes (and rests) are long, and upbeats are shorter and later. This phenomenon isn’t represented well by classical musical notation, but sometimes it is approximated like this:

    Or like this:

    The examples assign the downbeat notes a length exactly 2 times that of the upbeat notes—the triplet quarter note is twice as long as the triplet eighth, or, in other words, the swing ratio is 2:1.

    The debate over swing ratios

    The triplet method of explaining swing rhythm is unpopular with many jazz musicians and educators, who insist that a triplet-like 2:1 ratio is incorrect. Most of them, if pressed, are unable to provide a better ratio or formula. Instead they insist on the importance of listening to jazz to aurally absorb the “correct” ratio (or system of ratios, perhaps varying with tempo), or propose that swing can only properly be “felt” rather than explained.

    There are a number of things that these musicians and educators are correct about: a triplety ratio isn’t necessarily correct, and listening is important.

    What these otherwise fine folks sometimes get wrong is the idea that swing can’t be measured or analyzed. In fact, it has been extensively measured and analyzed by a number of scholars, and some useful generalizations can be made. (If you want to dig into the research, an excellent place to start is the article “Preferred swing ratio in jazz as a function of tempo” by Anders Friberg and Andreas Sundström, published in TMH-QPSR, volume 38, no. 4, 1997.)

    Some helpful swing generalizations

    • In general, yes, a swing ratio of 2:1, triplet-style, works fine for many situations, particularly at moderate tempos.
    • It’s fairly common for swing ratios to increase (something like 2.5:1 or even higher) at slower tempos. A higher ratio could be described as “swinging harder.”
    • It’s also common for swing ratios to get lower at faster tempos (like 1.5:1). This could be described as “not swinging as hard” or maybe playing “straighter.”
    • However, jazz performers’ ratios vary, depending on factors that are perhaps best summarized as “personal taste.” And, yes, the best way to develop this informed taste is by listening to and internalizing a lot of great jazz.

    It might be helpful for classically-trained musicians to consider how they interpret something like a grace note—its individual placement, length, emphasis, etc. depend on many factors, and a “swung” eighth note’s interpretation is similarly complex.

    Happy swinging!

  • Mario Rivera (1939-2007): Latin saxophone and flute

    I recently got a copy of the 1984 Tito Puente disc El Rey. I’m sorry to say I wasn’t familiar with the names of any of the other musicians on the album—everyone sounds absolutely incredible—but I was blown away by the flute and tenor playing of Mario Rivera.

    A quick Google search later and I can see that the late Mr. Rivera ranks among the heavies of Latin Jazz, and I have been missing out on his playing before now. Pick up a copy of El Rey and check out his virtuosic charanga-style flute playing (on Puente’s Oye Como Va, for examplethat’s right, Tito Puente wrote it, not Carlos Santana) and some really tasty tenor sounds, too (check out the Latin cover of Giant Steps).

    Or, surf on over to YouTube for some videos from a Bern Jazz Festival appearance. Hear some breathtaking baritone  playing, some really nice flute duets (not to mention piccolos, timbales, and scat) with Dave Valentin, and, if that’s not enough, Rivera on vibes and even trumpet(!). Read More “Mario Rivera (1939-2007): Latin saxophone and flute”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments that take a negative or confrontational tone are subject to email and name verification before being approved. In other words: no anonymous trolls allowed—take responsibility for your words.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.