Airline travel with musical instruments

airplaneDuring the past few months, I’ve had the opportunity to do some traveling with my instruments, on a number of airlines and through quite a few airports. Here are a few thoughts on getting instruments safely and smoothly to your destination.

Going through airport security

  • In most cases, your plan should be to carry your instrument(s) onto the plane with you. That means taking the instrument through airport security, and sending it on the conveyor belt through the x-ray scanner. In my experience, security personnel are generally very good about recognizing musical instruments as such, and sending them on through without raising an eyebrow.
  • Security personnel may, however, wish to open instrument cases for closer inspection. In my experience, inspectors are uniformly courteous and respectful about this, and usually notify me before they begin. Earlier this week I had a security officer let me know that he needed to open my oboe case, which I had sent  through the x-ray within a larger carry-on bag. I asked politely if he would let me open the case for him, and he was more than happy to allow this. I recommend taking this approach, since security personnel may not know which side is “up.” If you open the case yourself, you won’t have to worry about instrument parts rolling out onto the airport floor.
  • I also like to lock any carry-on instruments cases that can be locked, and, of course, make sure I keep the keys handy. This ensures that security personnel can’t open the case without me while I’m still trying to get my shoes back on. Besides, airports and planes can be crowded, and I like to be sure that my cases won’t pop open if jostled or bumped.
  • There is an agreement between the TSA, which runs airport security in US airports, and the AFM, the musicians’ union, which allows for instruments to pass through security screening checkpoints. A letter regarding this has been widely circulated on the web. Be advised that, despite some wording in the letter that seems to suggest otherwise, the agreement does not require the airline to let you carry your instrument onto the plane itself.  A number of sources recommend bringing a copy of the letter with you through security; it may not hurt, but I have to doubt that waving a letter around, telling the TSA officers how to do their job, will do much good if there’s a problem.
  • You should also keep in mind that accessories may not be allowed through security: reed knives, sharp little screwdrivers, water in humidifiers or reed-soaking containers, and so on. Water can be emptied out, and knives, etc., can be packed in your checked bag without a problem.
  • One last tip, which hopefully goes without saying: if you are polite and friendly, security staff are far more likely to get you through to your terminal quickly and easily.

Once you are through security, smaller instruments shouldn’t be a problem. All but the bulkiest of flute, oboe, and clarinet cases fit well within standard carry-on dimensions. Bassoons and saxophones as large as tenor can often be carried on, as well, but be aware that it’s a gray area and that even your best efforts are not guaranteed to get your horn into the airplane’s cabin. I can tell you, however, that I’ve never been denied bringing even a bassoon or a tenor aboard. Here is my approach:

At the gate

  • Don’t unnecessarily call attention to the instrument by approaching the airline staff to ask questions about bringing it on board.
  • Especially with smaller planes, an airline staffer may wish to tag your instrument case for gate checking. Accept the tag graciously. Don’t make a stink.
  • As the gate attendant takes your boarding pass, look him or her in the eye and smile, and say something friendly and polite if appropriate. Don’t look down at your instrument. If your case hasn’t been pre-tagged for gate checking, this may be the gate personnel’s last chance to decide that your instrument is too large to carry on. Hold the instrument in the hand farthest away, with your body casually blocking their view of it. It’s not a secret that you’re holding a case, you just don’t want it to look any larger than it is. If the case has a handle on one end that allows the case to be held in a vertical orientation (taller rather than wider), use that one.

Boarding the plane

  • As you head down the jetway or onto the tarmac, discreetly remove and pocket the gate-check tag, or, since it’s usually attached to the case’s handle, just make sure the tag is inside your hand. If the flight attendants know the gate personnel have pre-tagged carry-ons for gate check, they are likely to go along with the gate personnel’s decisions. Don’t let them know that yours has already been deemed too large. On a recent trip, I politely allowed my alto case to be tagged in the terminal, and carried it easily on board with the tag hidden inside my hand. But due to a minor mix-up, the flight attendant at the plane’s entrance needed to see my boarding pass, and I let go of my case to retrieve the pass. The flight attendant immediately noticed the neon-pink tag, and insisted that the case—which had been no problem until that moment—would have to go beneath the plane. Read on to the next tip to find out how I averted the crisis.
  • If a flight attendant on the plane balks at letting the instrument on, don’t get bogged down in arguing or explaining. The flight attendant wants the problem solved as quickly and agreeably as possible, especially since there may be a hundred or more people still in line behind you. I like to give my best smile and make a very direct and polite request: “This is a musical instrument. May I keep it here in the cabin?” This is not a time to deliver a lecture about the instrument’s value or fragility, or otherwise to suggest that you deserve special treatment. I find that when I ask simply and politely, the flight crew are usually willing to allow the instrument on board “for now” or “if there is enough room.” From that point, I have always been totally in the clear.

If you have to gate-check your instrument

Sometimes this may be unavoidable. I’ve luckily never had it happen, but I do like to be prepared.

  • Even if you’re not a traveler, a good solid case and a good insurance policy (deal with a company that specializes in musical instruments!) are your instrument’s best friends. I lock my cases while traveling, if possible, to avoid them coming open accidentally. My bassoon case is solid but it doesn’t lock and I’m not sure how much I can trust the latches, so I bring a couple of bungee cords along in case I have to strap it closed for gate checking.

If you have to check-check your instrument

Sometimes you know in advance that an instrument isn’t going to make it onto the plane in your hand.

  • If at all possible, I like to pack the instrument in its case, inside a larger suitcase with my clothes around it for extra padding. Sometimes I have to do this because I’m bringing multiple instruments and can’t carry all of them on. I usually choose to put my metal instruments into the suitcase because they won’t crack like wooden ones might in the non-climate-controlled cargo bay.
  • I also highly recommend taping a friendly note onto the case, in the event that your suitcase is inspected, and your case opened by security personnel:

    Turn the other side up before opening, please!

  • …or politely and succinctly give any other vital written instructions that will help them handle your instrument properly.

Have a nice trip!

Similar Posts

  • |

    Q&A: The big picture

    Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases, at no cost to you.

    Here are some of the questions readers sent me in celebration of this blog’s 10-year anniversary. I have edited, combined, and otherwise adapted some of them but hopefully there are answers here for those of you who were kind enough to inquire.

    Why does music move humanity so profoundly?

    My personal belief is that music is divine in origin, and that there is something inherent to humankind that responds to music. Since I believe that everyone is a child of God, I suppose the love of music is a divinely-inherited trait. Leaders in my faith have said, for example, that “Music is given of God to further his purposes,” and observed “Music is truly the universal language, and when it is excellently expressed how deeply it moves our souls.”

    If that’s not your style, you may prefer Darwin’s speculation that the earliest attempts at human language were more like musical gestures than like words. An ability to relate to these sounds is at the foundation of language in the more modern sense, and thus underlies virtually all human experience and culture.

    In any case, even as a faith-plus-science kind of guy, I’m definitely out of my depth here, so feel free to share your theories in the comments.

    Are applied music studios in higher education sustainable considering the supply of music graduates exceeds available employment?

    There are issues here for sure. I can only vouch for my own approach:

    Most of my university students are music education majors, and where I live this does seem to be sustainable. My graduates for the most part are able to land and keep jobs doing what they are trained for: directing middle school and high school bands.

    Many of my students at some point inquire about the degree in performance. If they are interested in that route and have the skill to pursue it, we have a long talk about the career path of a performance major. Essentially, a bachelors degree in performance qualifies you for one thing, entry into an masters program. The masters qualifies you for a doctoral program, and that qualifies you to teach in higher education and perpetuate the cycle. We talk seriously about the prospects for employment in higher ed (slim).

    On the other hand, a college or university education isn’t a trade school certificate—it is meant to produce a well-rounded citizen of the world, with literacy in key fields of human thought and skills in areas like communication and critical thinking. If a prospective student wishes to study the art of musical performance for reasons that are not necessarily 100% practical, then I would like to see that opportunity available to them. Schools and students should be clear with each other about their goals, so there isn’t any confusion about, for example, guarantees of employment.

    Some of my students have leveraged some of the more general skills developed in their musical education to pursue careers in other fields, which I find to be a perfectly good outcome. There is also at least some anecdotal evidence that college music majors are welcomed by challenging, high-status programs like law and medical schools.

    When will woodwind makers deplete resources of grenadilla/mpingo wood?

    I don’t know the answer. My understanding is that these woods are not in danger of extinction, exactly. But the culling of the tallest, straightest specimens for products like oboes and clarinets has potential to cause an evolutionary bottleneck, since only trees that are unsuitable for instruments (because they are curvy, for example) are left alone to reproduce.

    I think that the inevitable conclusion to this is alternative materials for instruments. This will be a tough sell for some musicians, but will ultimately be for the better. If modern science can develop amazing new materials for everything from mobile phone technology to medicine to space travel, why not for music? I’m confident that the “wood”-wind instruments will continue to exist in materials that are more sustainable, stable, affordable, crack-free, ergonomic, and beautiful-sounding.

    Why does the principal oboist tune the orchestra?

    Tradition. We have methods of providing a reference pitch that are far more accurate and reliable than even the best oboist. But the ritual is a comfortable one.

    There are lots of additional theories. I’ve written previously about why a bunch of these don’t make sense, and that post continues to draw comments largely based on questionable understanding of “overtones.”


    Thanks for your questions! These are some tough ones.

    More 10-year anniversary Q&A

  • Playing professional whole notes

    I have spent many hours of my life absorbed in difficult études and repertoire. Challenging music pushes the limits of my abilities.

    But when I actually get hired to play music, it’s almost never anything that complicated. Many of my workaday gigs are very easy—on paper.

    One part of my career is playing with a nearby symphony. The repertoire occasionally has a few moments in it that demand my fleetest technique. But, as a wind player, I spend much more of the concert counting rests and waiting to play another handful of whole notes.

    I recently played in a recording session for a local band’s new album. I played a total of one note. I played it a bunch of times, but it was just the one long note, over and over.

    A beginner could play one note. So why hire a professional?

    The notes—fast or slow, easy or hard—need to be beautiful, balanced, in tune, started precisely, ended precisely, shaped appropriately, and stylistically appropriate.

    I’ve never been hired to play études, and almost never to play classical solo repertoire, but studying those has helped me develop the control and skill to play the whole notes just right, and that’s what gets me hired.

  • 10 ways to improve your musicianship with a computer

    laptopIt seems like there’s very little I do these days without a computer. Here are some ways I have used a laptop to boost my practice sessions. Read More “10 ways to improve your musicianship with a computer”

  • Why do some instruments transpose?

    I find it difficult to explain to the uninitiated the concept of “transposing” instruments. The what is confusing. The why is worse.

    To get the what across, I usually have to resort to an example: “Okay, so it works like this. If I am playing an alto saxophone, and I see an F-sharp on the page, I think ‘F-sharp,’ and do the correct fingering for F-sharp, and then I blow into the instrument and an A comes out.”

    Sometimes a visual representation is useful (here are transpositions for some common woodwind instruments):

    Instruments Written pitch Sounding pitch
    Piccolo
    Down an octave

    Up an octave
    Clarinet in E-flat
    Down a m3

    Up a m3
    Flute, Oboe
    (non-transposing)
    Bassoon
    (non-transposing)
    Clarinet in B-flat, Soprano saxophone
    Up a M2

    Down a M2
    Clarinet in A
    Up a m3

    Down a m3
    Alto flute
    Up a P4

    Down a P4
    English horn
    Up a P5

    Down a P5
    Alto saxophone
    Up a M6

    Down a M6
    Contrabassoon
    Up an octave

    Down an octave
    Tenor saxophone, Bass clarinet
    Up a M9

    Down a M9
    Baritone saxophone, Contrabass clarinet in E-flat
    Up an octave and a M6

    Down an octave and a M6

    This system is, shall we say, “difficult:”

    • Composer/arranger/copyist: “What was that transposition for alto flute again? A fourth, I think, but was it a fourth down or a fourth up? Or was it a fifth?”
    • Conductor: “Let’s see, the alto saxophones have an E and a B, the tenor has a D-sharp, and the baritone has a D-natural. So that chord would be, um…”
    • Educator: “Okay, everybody play a B-flat scale. I mean, ‘concert’ B-flat. So C for clarinets and tenor saxophones, G for altos and baritones, E-flat for English horn… or is it F for English horn?…”
    • Gigging musician: “I need to buy the fakebook in E-flat. Hmm, and I guess I also need the B-flat, in case I play clarinet on anything. I wonder if I’ll need the C book for flute, too? Wait, let me make a phone call.”

    (And that’s just the system used for the modern band and orchestral instruments!) Read More “Why do some instruments transpose?”

  • Why I don’t list my equipment

    Many musicians are eager to tell you what equipment they use. They list their equipment on their websites, in the signature lines of their forum postings, and so on. I don’t.

    I’m rarely impressed with what I see on fellow woodwind players’ lists. Ownership of impressive equipment (assuming the gear is, in fact, paid for?) does not make a fine player. Ownership of unimpressive equipment seems, well, like it’s not worth boasting about.

    Some musicians seem to see their equipment listing as a service to the musical community, as though others will benefit from knowing what instruments they play. Buying instruments, mouthpieces, reeds, and so forth just because another player uses them—even a truly fine player—is much like buying the same shoes your favorite basketball player wears. No doubt they are fine shoes, but they might not suit your feet, your ability level, your playing surface, or your personal sense of style. Equipment listings are especially hazardous to younger beginners, who may be easily convinced that owning certain equipment will solve their problems, or who may ill-advisedly buy equipment that isn’t a good fit for them. Read More “Why I don’t list my equipment”

  • Things that aren’t jazz

    Photo, frawemedia

    Okay, first of all: what I’m talking about here is the “mainstream” jazz tradition, insofar as such a thing exists (you can make a good argument that it doesn’t, really). “Jazz” is a wide net to cast. To flip it around, if I were going to list things that aren’t “classical” music, I might say “use of the electric bass guitar” or even “microtonality.” Are those things really mutually exclusive with classical music? No. But they are not part of the tradition of the Viennese masters, not what your local community orchestra would play, not what most people think of when they think of classical music.

    One misconception that many classical musicians seem to have about jazz is that since it has strong improvisatory elements, it must be very free and unstructured. I think the opposite is true: improvisation, at least in the mainstream-bebop/hard-bop-influenced style, requires fairly strict structural underpinnings. None of the following works well when someone is trying to improvise:

    • Free forms. Form in jazz is much stricter than in classical music. Most common jazz tunes have one of two forms. The first is precisely 32 bars in 4/4 time, with four eight-bar sections: AABA. The second is precisely twelve 4/4 bars, a “blues” form. Anything that doesn’t fit exactly into one of these categories is most likely very closely related to one of them.
    • Free harmony. Bebop and hard-bop jazz are extremely tonal. While improvisers may play pitches that fall “outside” the chords, it is almost always within a tonal framework: the notes function as upper extensions of the chords, or at least they are used in a sort of polychordal way that has reference to the underlying harmony and will ultimately resolve back to it. The idea that “there are no wrong notes” isn’t exactly true; notes can definitely sound very wrong if they aren’t properly contextualized with regard to the harmony.
    • Free or changing meter. Jazz makes frequent use of polymeter and syncopation, which can give the impression of shifting meter, but most jazz doesn’t actually change meters, especially in improvisatory sections. The polyrhythms and syncopations work because they are overlaid on an unchanging metric pulse, and resolve to it.
    • Rubato. Tempi also tend to quite strict in jazz playing. A musician might “lay back” in the beat or stretch a rhythm, but the underlying pulse doesn’t change. (In my experience, jazz players generally have much steadier internal metronomes than classical musicians.)
    The freedom that improvisers do have is to create melodies over these fairly rigid structures. The rigidity gives the improviser a predictable framework to work with (or perhaps against). At a more detailed level, there are certain melodic characteristics that classical musicians tend to associate with jazz, that I don’t hear when I listen to jazz or play with fine jazz musicians: Read More “Things that aren’t jazz”

9 Comments

  1. I am going to Ohio with my alto sax And TSA says on there website that you are allowed to bring your instrument alongside one carryon and a personal item. But on allegiant airlines website which I am flying on it says you are only allowed one carryon bag and one personal item but an instrument counts as your carryon. I need my carryon for clothing. Any advice?

    1. I definitely suggest putting your clothes in a checked bag, and carrying the saxophone on with you. Keeping your instrument safe is worth the checked baggage fee. Have a safe trip!

  2. As a bari player, carrying the horn on board is something I haven’t even tried. I’ve had good luck so far with the SKB Bari case. It protects the horn adequately, doesn’t weigh a ton, has wheels, and has TSA locks. These can be opened by security personnel even if you’re not there. That’s a good thing, as it means they don’t have to break the lock to get your case open.

    1. Not that I can see. The “new” rule seems to codify what was already standard practice: you are allowed to carry an instrument onto the plane as long as it meets the airline’s carry-on requirements. The new rule doesn’t seem to offer any provision that will increase the number of instruments that get approved as carry-ons. (It does require airlines to let you buy a seat for an instrument within a certain size range, which I’m not sure was previously the case. It also “encourages” airlines to make some additional allowances where possible for oversized carry-ons, but doesn’t require it.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments that take a negative or confrontational tone are subject to email and name verification before being approved. In other words: no anonymous trolls allowed—take responsibility for your words.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.