10 jazz albums that should be in every music lover’s collection

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases, at no cost to you.

Hello, music fans!

Miles Davis: Kind of Blue
You need this.

I’ve picked out, for your listening pleasure, ten essential jazz albums, as an easy introduction to the wide world of jazz. You’re welcome.

I’ll assume that you already love music. But maybe you’re a lifelong rocker. Or a connossieur of the great classical composers. Or maybe you like both kinds of music: country and western. No matter your taste, the jazz section of the record store can be a little bewildering.

Let’s face it, the jazz world is a members-only club. We jazz fans love to lord our superior musical tastes over the uninitiated masses. You listen to whom? Kenny G?! I think I need to lie down.

Plus, if you’re like me, your budget doesn’t quite allow for the latest comprehensive 40-disc boxed set from Verve or Columbia Records. Same thing goes for rare and valuable vinyl collector’s items.

So, these ten albums have been carefully chosen to do a few things:

  • Introduce you to key jazz artists, styles, albums, and songs.
  • Keep the cost reasonable. These albums are all readily available and reasonably priced single compact discs (no expensive multidisc sets) or iTunes albums.
  • Preserve the dignity of the jazz tradition, by giving you the music in complete album format whenever possible. No samplers or compilations, except in a couple of cases where compilations are the only logical choice.
  • And, most importantly, add the pleasure and richness of the jazz world to your life!

Let’s get going! We’ll do this in a sort of rough chronological order.

The Short List

Click away, kids!

Louis Armstrong: Best of the Hot Five and Hot Seven Recordings

Columbia/Legacy, originally recorded 1926-1928 in New York City.

Louis Armstrong: Best of the Hot Five and Hot Seven Recordings

Why this album?

  • Louis Armstrong was the vital figure in coalescing the emerging “hot” jazz style (as opposed to the “sweet” style favored by white bands in those segregated days). There is very little in today’s diverse jazz world that can’t be traced directly back to these essential recordings by Armstrong’s Hot Five (a quintet, of course), and the expanded Hot Seven group.
  • As I said, I prefer not to use compilations, but an exception is clearly in order here, since these recordings predate the LP record, and would have been released as singles. There are a number of compilations available, but this one is especially solid.

Style:

  • Traditional (or “trad”) jazz, hot jazz, or Dixieland.

Important people:

  • Louis Armstrong, cornet, leader, composer

What to listen for:

  • Collective improvisation, with everyone playing their independent, made-up-on-the-spot parts simultaneously. This is a hallmark of Dixieland jazz. Armstrong’s power as a soloist, however, forces the introduction of a new texture that will quicky become a jazz staple: that of the single soloist, accompanied by bass, drums, and maybe guitar and/or piano.
  • Armstrong’s bold, brassy cornet sound. Popular legend says that in those days, before modern recording studios, Armstrong had to play in the next room to avoid overpowering the rest of the band on the recording.

How to sound smart talking about this album:

  • Continually point out how Armstrong is way, way ahead of his time.
  • For bonus snobbery points, pronounce the “S” in Louis, and correct people who call him Louie. Armstrong became “Louie” in the media, but always prounounced the “S” when referring to himself.

Buy it!

Duke Ellington: Best of the Duke Ellington Centennial Edition

RCA Victor, originally recorded 1927-1973.

Duke Ellington: Best of the Duke Ellington Centennial Edition

Why this album?

  • This album will have to represent all of the so-called “big bands” (usually somewhere from fifteen to twenty-five musicians), although the bands of Count Basie or Stan Kenton could also have taken this spot. The Duke wins out because of his timeless repertoire, as well as his unmatched stable of virtuoso musicians (which gradually changed throughout the band’s history).
  • Again a compilation—this is the last one, I swear. We have the same problem of some of these recordings predating the LP; also, the band’s longevity makes a compilation a good choice for a big-picture view.

Style:

  • Big band

Important people:

  • Edward “Duke” Ellington, leader, piano, composer & arranger
  • Billy Strayhorn, composer, arranger, Ellington’s right-hand man
  • Ben Webster, tenor saxophone
  • Johnny Hodges, alto saxophone
  • Jimmy Blanton, bass
  • Harry Carney, baritone saxophone
  • Juan Tizol, valve trombone
  • Ray Nance, trumpet, violin

What to listen for:

  • The full, rich sound of the big band. The collective improvisation of the Dixieland band has been abandoned in favor of a more organized, orchestrated sound, with the musicians reading their parts from sheet music.
  • Individual personalities. Ellington and collaborator Billy Strayhorn write music with individual musicians in mind, highlighting each band member’s characteristic and idiosyncratic style.
  • Antiphonal writing, in which a soloist or group is contrasted against another soloist or group in a conversation, an exchange, or even a battle.

How to sound smart talking about this album:

  • Admit that you admire the new directions that the band explored post-1950, but you really prefer the more raw sound of the Blanton-Webster years (about 1940-1942, when bassist Jimmy Blanton and saxophonist Ben Webster made essential contributions to the band’s sound).

Buy it!

“The Quintet”: Jazz at Massey Hall

Debut, recorded 1953 in Toronto, Canada.

"The Quintet": Jazz at Massey Hall

Why this album?

  • “Bebop,” the fast-paced, virtuosic, harmonically inventive music generally associated with New York City and the mid-1940’s, makes arguably its definitive statement in this recording in Toronto in the 1950’s. The founding fathers of bebop are at the top of their game here, playing their most characteristic repertoire with wild abandon.
  • The so-called “Quintet” isn’t a formal group, just an auspicious meeting of the minds. By 1953, however, most of these musicians had played with each of the others many times. The important thing is that we get each of these five incredible and important musicians all together on one disc.

Style:

  • Bebop, or just “bop”

Important people: everyone on the album.

  • Charlie Parker, alto saxophone
  • Dizzy Gillespie, trumpet, composer
  • Bud Powell), piano
  • Charles Mingus, bass
  • Max Roach, drums

What to listen for:

  • The breakneck tempos and virtuosic improvised solos.
  • The small-group dynamic. Economic pressures and the quest for something new had broken up many of the big bands by the late 1940’s. Bebop musicians, freed from the heavily-orchestrated big bands, love to feed from each other’s energy, “quote” each other’s melodic lines, and interject humor and invention into each solo.
  • Complex rhythms, melodies, and harmony. Bebop is the thinking man’s jazz. This isn’t music for dancing or for socializing; it’s music for smiling knowingly while nursing a highball.

How to sound smart talking about this album:

  • Think up a fictional song title, and pretend to hear Charlie Parker or Dizzy Gillespie quoting from it. “Was that a little bit of ‘Purple Moon?’ I could have sworn it was the triplet lick from the second bar of the bridge.” Bebop fans will immediately agree with you. Others will give you blank stares. From now on you may treat all of them as hopeless squares.
  • Remember, Gillespie was bebop’s most public figure, and popular with the media and the public, but jazz fans usually regard Parker as the more important musical figure.

Buy it!

Miles Davis: Birth of the Cool

Capitol, recorded 1949-1950 in New York City.

Miles Davis: Birth of the Cool

Why this album?

  • By 1949, Miles Davis had studied at the feet of the bebop giants, absorbed their style, and was ready to try a new direction. This album is, in fact, widely considered to represent the birth of the “cool” school, a mellower, gentler, more orchestrated sound to contrast with the fire and fury of bebop.

Style:

  • Cool jazz, or “Cool School”

Important people:

  • Miles Davis, leader, composer, trumpet
  • Gil Evans, composer
  • Lee Konitz, alto saxophone
  • Gerry Mulligan, baritone saxophone

What to listen for:

  • Heavy influence of classical music: focus on melody and counterpoint, elegance and balance of form, even use of orchestral instruments like the French horn and the tuba (virtually unused in jazz since the Dixieland days).
  • The refined but carefully un-virtuosic solos from Davis and saxophonists Konitz and Mulligan.

How to sound smart talking about this album:

  • Don’t be afraid to use the word “nonet” to decribe Davis’s 9-piece band. (Pronounce it like “no net.”)

Buy it!

Miles Davis: Kind of Blue

Columbia, recorded 1959 in New York City.

Miles Davis: Kind of Blue

Why this album?

  • Miles Davis makes the list twice in a row because of two honest-to-goodness jazz revolutions. In fact, he will continue to reinvent himself and the music throughout his career.
  • This album heralds the arrival of modal jazz, a style that pushes its musicians to invent and innovate within a limited harmonic framework.

Style:

  • Modal jazz

Important people:

  • Miles Davis, leader, composer, trumpet
  • Julian “Cannonball” Adderley, alto saxophone
  • John Coltrane, tenor saxophone
  • Bill Evans, piano

What to listen for:

  • A sense of stasis created by the use of “modal” harmony, a technique in which the musicians limit themselves to a certain collection of notes.
  • Davis’s use of “space” (silence) in his solos. Davis was known to have encouraged saxophonist Coltrane—notorious for his rapid and extended volleys of notes—to use more space in his solos, too.

How to sound smart talking about this album:

  • Smirk at Cannonball Adderley’s solos, and remark on his inability to resist throwing in a bebop lick here and there.

Buy it!

John Coltrane: Giant Steps

Atlantic, recorded 1959 in New York City.

John Coltrane: Giant Steps

Why this album?

  • Coltrane’s analytical mind and obsessive practice routine led him to a new sound, heard in this watershed recording. His compositions here are methodical explorations of a new harmonic direction. The complexities of Coltrane’s harmonic ideas stand in stark contrast to the much simpler palette of Miles Davis’s Kind of Blue album, on which Coltrane appeared in the very same year. Coltrane’s album would prove to be as influential and important as Davis’s.

Style:

  • Post-bop or hard bop

Important people:

  • John Coltrane, leader, composer, tenor saxophone

What to listen for:

  • Angular, even jarring harmonic progressions; the building blocks of bebop arranged into a new and surprising structure.
  • Coltrane’s stark, metallic tone, very different from the full, round, smoky sound associated with the tenor saxophone in previous decades.
  • Coltrane’s phenomenal technical ability on the saxophone. His long, cascading volleys of rapid notes became known as “sheets of sound.”

How to sound smart talking about this album:

  • Confess that you cried the first time you heard Coltrane play “Naima.”
  • Refer to bassist Paul Chambers as “P.C.,” as Coltrane did when he named one of the tunes on this album “Mr. P.C.”

Buy it!

Horace Silver: Song For My Father

Blue Note, recorded 1963 in Englewood, New Jersey.

Horace Silver: Song for My Father

Why this album?

  • The designation “hard bop” applies to much of the diverse bebop-influenced music of the 1960’s (including John Coltrane’s 1959 Giant Steps). But Song For My Father exemplifies the sound that is most often associated with that term: it’s bebop mixed with a strong element of gospel and the blues.

Style:

  • Hard bop

Important people:

  • Horace Silver, leader, piano, composer
  • Joe Henderson, tenor saxophone
  • Rudy Van Gelder, recording engineer

What to listen for:

  • Less flashy than bebop, but more soulful and gritty. The beboppers were all about clever, fluent melodic lines. The hard-boppers could do that, too—and then moan and wail with the best of the bluesmen.
  • The marvelous soundscape created by legendary recording engineer Rudy Van Gelder, whose Englewood home recording studio was as important to the Blue Note sound as Joe Henderson’s tenor saxophone.

How to sound smart talking about this album:

  • If anyone comments that the title track’s groove reminds them of Steely Dan’s “Rikki Don’t Lose That Number,” you may give them the look of death. If they in any way imply that “Rikki” is a better song, you are permitted to slap them.

Buy it!

Ornette Coleman: The Shape of Jazz to Come

Atlantic, recorded 1959 in Los Angeles.

Ornette Coleman: The Shape of Jazz to Come

Why this album?

  • Ornette Coleman was a major figure in the avant garde and “free jazz” movements. While the album’s title proved to be less than one hundred percent prophetic, the free-er approach of Coleman and a few others did at least become a part of the vocabulary of jazz to come.

Style:

  • Avant garde jazz

Important people:

  • Ornette Coleman, leader, composer, alto saxophone

What to listen for:

  • If you have a trained musical ear, you may be bothered at first by the, shall we say, flexible approach to both pitch and rhythm. If you don’t have a trained ear (yet?), you will still probably recognize that there are some strange things afoot here. Relax, people! This music is about coloring outside the lines. Catch hold of the expressive and emotional content, and enjoy the ride.
  • Coleman often cited his own theory of “harmolodics” as justification for the unconventional aspects of his music, but has never really given a satisfactory explanation of just what “harmolodics” means. Don’t let that bother you. Just listen.
  • There’s no instrument playing chords here; usually a jazz group will have a piano and/or guitar to fill that role. Instead, Coleman’s quartet uses bass and drums to create a sort of pulsating background texture, which leaves the saxophone and cornet free to experiment in the foreground.

How to sound smart talking about this album:

  • Point out to anyone who will listen that Coleman is playing an unusual plastic saxophone on this recording.
  • If anyone complains that the musicians seem out of tune, treat them with pity—this music is way over their poor little heads.

Buy it!

Stan Getz and Joao Gilberto, featuring Antonio Carlos Jobim: Getz/Gilberto

Verve, recorded 1963 in New York City.

Stan Getz and Joao Gilberto, featuring Antonio Carlos Jobim: Getz/Gilberto

Why this album?

  • Since the early days of jazz, jazz musicians have been enthralled by the nuanced rhythms of Brazil and the Caribbean. This fascination came to a head—and created a brief mainstream pop sensation—with the bossa nova, a cosmopolitan blend of the Brazilian samba, French impressionist composition, and American jazz’s cool school. This album is the jazz bossa nova sound at its best.

Style:

  • Bossa nova, or, to be less specific, “Latin”

Important people:

  • Stan Getz, tenor saxophone
  • Antonio Carlos Jobim, composer, piano
  • Joao Gilberto, guitar, vocal
  • Astrud Gilberto, vocal. Mrs. Gilberto, a housewife, was at the recording session to translate, and was apparently invited on the spur of the moment to sing on the record.

What to listen for:

  • Do you get the urge to dance—very slowly—when you listen to the bossa nova? That’s because its characteristic groove is a half-speed version of the samba, a fast-paced Brazilian dance.
  • Getz’s playing is unmistakably jazz, while the Brazilian musicians’ contribution is decidedly bossa. This collaboration is not so much a blending of styles as it is a surprisingly effective contrast.

How to sound smart talking about this album:

  • Act like you are barely tolerating Astrud Gilberto’s singing. Speak the name of Antonio Carlos Jobim in hushed, reverent tones.
  • By the way, the J’s and G in “Jobim” and “Joao Gilberto” sound like the S in “fusion.” The G in “Getz” doesn’t.

Buy it!

Weather Report: Heavy Weather

Columbia, recorded 1977 in Hollywood.

Weather Report: Heavy Weather

Why this album?

  • The fusion of jazz with rock would prove to be one of the most exciting and dynamic combinations in the history of either music. The band Weather Report did it with very listenable and memorable results.

Style:

  • Fusion

Important people:

  • Josef Zawinul, keyboards, composer
  • Jaco Pastorius, electric bass, composer
  • Wayne Shorter, soprano and tenor saxophones, composer

What to listen for:

  • The prominence of electronic instruments, such as electric pianos, keyboard-based synthesizers, and electric bass guitar, which were rapidly proving themselves as very useful jazz instruments.
  • The stunning technique of Jaco Pastorius on the electric bass, which suddenly became a virtuoso instrument.

How to sound smart talking about this album:

  • Immediately and contemptuously dismiss any comparisons between Weather Report’s original “Birdland” and the Manhattan Transfer’s vocal cover version.

Buy it!

Your to-do list

  1. Buy all of these albums, and play them in your personal compact disc player or pod-type device.
  2. Write something awesome in the comments.
  3. Tell your friends.
  4. Embark with ears wide open on a lifetime journey through the wonders of jazz music, or whatever.
  5. You should probably get started.

Similar Posts

  • Instrument stands for doublers: mini-reviews and a wish list

    Recently I have been getting a bit of pit work from a nearby community theater. They like to do month-long runs of their shows, which means that the musical director often hires two or more people for each seat in the orchestra, so that they can trade off playing the show according to their availability. One little perk of this method is that often the woodwind player who does the first show leaves his or her instrument stands in the pit for the other doubler(s) to use, so I’ve gotten to try out a variety of stands lately in a real-life situation.

    I have, of course, a number of stands of my own, most of which do a basically satisfactory job, but none of which I’m overwhelmingly enamored with. Read More “Instrument stands for doublers: mini-reviews and a wish list”

  • Review: New woodwind doubling duets from Gene Kaplan and Paul Saunders

    A couple of new books of duets for woodwind doublers hit my inbox recently. (I received complimentary copies without any promise of a review.) Gene Kaplan has published a second volume of his Duos for Doublers, following up the volume I reviewed previously. And Paul Saunders, whose other doubling publications I’ve reviewed, has written Six Duets for Woodwind Doublers.

    As I noted in previous reviews, (solo) etudes for woodwind doublers have an issue: it’s too easy to take extra time during instrument changes, a luxury that doesn’t exist in musical theater or many other doubling scenarios. Kaplan’s two volumes solve this by pairing the player with another doubler. Saunders’s previous works provided piano accompaniment (including downloadable backing tracks). Either solution keeps the woodwind doubler accountable to another musician (at least a virtual one) to execute the quick changes without disrupting the tempo.

    Saunders’s new publication expands on his previous offerings by introducing a duet format with piano or backing track. The backing tracks include versions with just accompaniment (piano plus a virtual rhythm section), or with accompaniment plus Saunders ably playing the first woodwind part, or with accompaniment plus the second part.

    Kaplan’s solution of course requires a duet partner with skills on three instruments, but also provides some flexibility in rehearsal with tempos or repeating problem sections. With two volumes available, each with a dozen 2-3 page duets, this would be a great resource for a sight reading session with a friend or student. (This new volume has well-placed page turns.)

    Saunders’s approach lends itself well to solo practice, and since you can play either part with Saunders covering the other, the six duets amount to twelve parts to work on. The included piano score also raises some possibilities for a polished public performance. (The introduction also indicates that the duets are composed to work without the accompaniment.)

    The books are similar in instrumentation, for flute/clarinet/saxophone doublers, with the first part using alto saxophone and the second using tenor. Saunders’s book has one duet with optional piccolos. I’ve been clear that I think the flute/clarinet/saxophone doubling paradigm is outdated in the 21st century, and while the market for such things is admittedly probably small, I’d like to see more resources available that incorporate double reeds.

    Both books publish the duets as separate parts, which is probably a closer match to the musical theater doubling experience, but I do prefer seeing both lines on the same page. With Saunders’s book, the additional piano score does show both parts, which could be helpful for perusal or rehearsal.

    I’ve updated my Music for woodwind doublers page to include these new publications. Keep me posted if you are aware of additional ones.

  • Review: Butch Hall Native-American-style flutes

    For years now I’ve told anyone who will listen how much I love my Butch Hall Native-American-style flute in F-sharp minor. I recently bought it a little friend in G minor, and realized it is high time I did a proper review of these lovely instruments.

    Hello, beautiful.
    Hello, beautiful.

    The modern instrument commonly referred to as the “Native American Flute” is related to a certain flute tradition associated with the Lakota people; of course labeling anything as “Native American” mistakenly implies that it is common to all the groups lumped together as “Native American.” As an additional complication name-wise, there are certain legal requirements regarding who can sell products under the designation “Native American,” so some flutemakers, for example, must sell their wares as “Native-American-style.” In general, flutes of this type, regardless of seller, are a contemporary take on a traditional instrument, often made with modern tools and processes and tweaked to suit contemporary Western-world pitch standards. This suits me just fine—I’m interested in the instrument’s history, but as a working musician I like an instrument that I can buy affordably and play in a variety of situations.

    If you are in the market for an instrument of this kind, be very careful about souvenir-type flutes, including some popular makes sold on the internet and in souvenir shops as “professional” instruments. If you want an instrument that plays beautifully, easily, and in tune, and is genuinely suited to professional playing situations, I strongly recommend that you send money to Butch Hall immediately. These are real-deal musician-quality flutes, and the amount of money involved is shockingly small. Read More “Review: Butch Hall Native-American-style flutes”

  • Transcription: Stan Getz, tenor saxophone on Huey Lewis and the News “Small World (Part Two)”

    Get the transcription (PDF)

    Huey Lewis tells the story in Kansas City Magazine (strong language edited):

    Well, my dad was a jazzer and Zoot Sims died. And when Zoot Sims died, they had a benefit in San Francisco at Kimball’s or somewhere. …

    So I take him and sit down … and then I get a tap on my shoulder. I turn around, and it’s Getz. It’s really amazing … he’s wearing his horn and taps me on the shoulder, and my dad turns around and Phil Elwood turns around. And my old man goes, “Holy s***!”

    Getz says, “Why don’t you let me play on some of your s***? I can play that s*** too.” And I said, “Oh, why, yes sir, I’m sure you can.” And then he took a card and he wrote on it: “Stan Getz. Have sax, will travel.”

    He played beautifully, and on the way home, my old man says, “If you don’t take him up on that offer, I will never, ever forgive you!”

    Get the transcription (PDF)

  • Review: Bob Hartig’s Giant Steps Scratch Pad Complete

    Recently, I’ve noticed a lot of jazz musician bloggers opining about the evils of memorizing patterns and “licks,” and calling for original and creative improvisation. While I don’t think anybody will argue about the importance of individuality and creativity, I do think it’s a big mistake to ignore the value of memorizing, practicing, and internalizing established jazz vocabulary.

    When a person learns a foreign language, they learn first to repeat some standard useful phrases. Then they learn to rearrange the vocabulary and syntax of those phrases to create new ones. Over a lifetime of study and practice, they may learn the language well enough to speak or write with their own distinctive creative voice. But if a student tries on the first day of French class to be creative and original, they aren’t likely to make much sense. To speak the language, you need to hear it, imitate it, and then repeat over and over. Genuine individual originality comes much, much later.

    So I was pleased to read an excellent blog post by saxophonist Bob Hartig:

    If you listen to a lot of Kenny Garrett, and if you take it upon yourself to transcribe a bunch of Kenny Garrett solos, and if you steep yourself in those Kenny Garrett solos, then chances are you will come out sounding an awful lot like Kenny Garrett.

    Now, if that’s all you aspire to, then that’s where you’ll end up: as a Kenny Garrett clone. But if you desire to forge your own voice, then Kenny will simply become a part of your vocabulary, a vocabulary that includes other influences besides Kenny and increasingly reflects your personal explorations with melody, harmony, timbre, and nuance. You are an individual, after all, and the sheer force of your individuality will direct you toward your own sound and approach.

    Bob expands on this in the comments section:

    A good writer doesn’t become one by attempting to create a different dictionary. He or she develops expertise by becoming conversant with the existing language, and that happens largely through reading the works of great writers who have gone before. Through careful scrutiny and application of how others have handled the English language, the individual’s personal writing style emerges.

    Shakespeare is noted for adding a huge number of words and phrases to the English language—undoubtedly one of the most creative minds working in that medium. But how many of the words and phrases in his works were really brand new inventions? Surely less than 1%. And how much did Charlie Parker or John Coltrane add to the jazz language, that wasn’t already there? Their contributions are staggeringly significant, but what they actually created out of thin air was a drop in the bucket among all the notes they played in their careers. For most of us mortals, our truly original contributions to the language (be it English or jazz) are few and far between; most of our creativity happens when we shuffle and remix the materials that are already before us.

    Bob backs up  his ideas about the importance of jazz vocabulary with his Giant Steps Scratch Pad project. The Scratch Pad provides a wealth of tasty and useful vocabulary for playing over the chord changes to John Coltrane’s tune “Giant Steps,” a tune that has challenged the best of jazz players for decades because of its unusual and elegantly symmetrical chord progression. Bob was kind enough to send me a review copy of the Giant Steps Scratch Pad Complete, a new PDF-only (at least for now) edition that contains the same material as the Scratch Pad, transposed into all twelve keys. The transposed material makes this especially good for those who aspire to play Giant Steps in all twelve keys, or who double on instruments of different transpositions.

    I took the Scratch Pad Complete for a test drive today. Read More “Review: Bob Hartig’s Giant Steps Scratch Pad Complete”

  • Review: D’Addario Select Jazz tenor saxophone mouthpieces

    I’ve already done thorough reviews of the D’Addario clarinet mouthpieces (twice) and alto saxophone jazz mouthpieces, both of which immediately replaced the competing Vandoren products I was previously using. So, naturally I’ve been very anxious for the release of the hard rubber tenor saxophone jazz mouthpiece, and I got my hands on some samples earlier this week. (Full disclosure: D’Addario sent me the mouthpieces for free, but with no strings attached. This is my best attempt to give an unbiased review.)

    I’m pleased to report that everything I like about the clarinet and alto mouthpieces is true of the tenor mouthpieces as well: these are well-made, utterly consistent, easy-to-play, affordable, versatile mouthpieces. Like the clarinet and alto pieces, the Select Jazz tenor mouthpiece is going to be my new mouthpiece for the foreseeable future.

    I like to be as low-fuss as possible about my gear. This is a sub-$200 mouthpiece, fully machine-made to fine tolerances, by a major woodwind accessory company. That means if I break or lose mine, I can quickly and easily get another that plays virtually identically from just about any online or brick-and-mortar music store. (Soon; the tenor mouthpieces don’t seem to be in many stores yet.) Check out my previous reviews for more in-depth discussion about that—in short, the days of having to order a half-dozen and pick the best one are gone.

    The Select Jazz tenor mouthpiece is currently available in a medium chamber and medium facing, with tip openings from 6 (2.54mm/.100”) to 9 (2.92mm/.115”). I’ve been wanting to move to a little smaller tip opening, and the 6 is just what I was looking for.

    The tip openings differ in the ways you would expect. The 6 likes a medium- or medium-soft strength reed, and the 9 needs a medium-soft or soft. The smaller openings are very slightly mellower in tone, softer in volume, and oriented toward stability rather than flexibility, while the larger ones are brighter, louder, and more flexible/less stable, but the differences really are pretty minor. The 6 is my favorite, but I could use the 9 on a gig in a pinch. Choosing your tip opening will probably be more a matter of comfort zone than a question of differences in sound or application.

    My previous mouthpiece was a slightly older model Vandoren V16 metal mouthpiece, the T75 (2.67mm/.105″, I think). It served me well for quite a few years, but recently I’ve been less satisfied with its difficult low notes and overall edginess. (After having it for a few years the gold plating started to get some discolored spots, and ultimately got some pitting on the table, so it may not be playing as well as it once did.) Playing hard rubber for jazz on tenor is actually new for me—I’ve played a string of metal mouthpieces since high school—but the transition to the Select Jazz has been seamless. Eyes closed, I don’t think I could tell the difference material-wise.

    For tenor in particular I want a mouthpiece that can do lots of things—a sweeter, mellower sound for small-group cocktail gigs, a punchier, gutsier sound for amplified rock and blues, precise articulation and rock-steady intonation for studio playing. The Select Jazz has a nice middle-of-the-road quality that moves easily between straight-ahead jazz and funkier sounds. I find that at a scream I don’t get quite as much bite in the tone as I do with the V16, but I was pleasantly surprised at the amount of bottom end in the sound at maximum volume. In other words, the V16 gets bright and aggressive when I push it, but the Select Jazz just gets big and powerful. I’m liking the tradeoff.

    The Select Jazz also wins hands down for ease of playing (against the V16, which I originally selected for its ease of playing). I could just about play a classical recital on the #6 if I had to—the articulation and response are easy from low B-flat up into the altissimo. Like the V16, it strikes a nice balance between stability and flexibility. It’s easy to play in tune, but there’s also plenty of room to bend the pitch around when I want to.

    I’m not going to do a thorough play-test comparison this time, because I don’t think it’s really necessary. My V16 is an old model, in poor shape, and metal, so the comparison isn’t really fair and they are perhaps somewhat different animals anyway. But here’s a quick demo of the 6, moving through a few different styles. (It was supposed to be one uninterrupted take, but I ended up having to re-record the last segment standing a little farther from the mic.) First a snippet of Body and Soul, then a few bars of a Brecker tune that I can never remember the name of, then Night Train, then the horn break from Sir Duke.

    I don’t see myself as a guy who gets snobby about brands, but D’Addario’s pro-line mouthpieces have hit the mark for me 100% so far. Looking forward to what’s next.

9 Comments

  1. Nice list. I might have chosen a different 10, but I can’t argue with these, either.

    One thing you forgot on “How to sound smart…” when talking about Charlie Parker and Dizzy Gillespie: Always refer to Parker as “Bird” and Gillespie as “Dizz”. “Man, Dizz really tore it up on that last chorus.” “Oh yeah, Bird is smokin’ on this one!”

    Geoff

  2. Impressive list… some of them are already a part of my collection.

    I really appreciate the notes you made with each selection. They were informative and entertaining and I enjoyed reading them all.

    The little gold nugget I’m leaving with which is now on my list of ‘next to get’ is “The Quintet”: Jazz at Massey Hall. I can’t believe I never heard of it before.

    Thanks for putting the list together!

  3. Nice list of 10 indispensables. I’d agree with 60% of them (unusual), and the acumen of selecting “Giant Steps” ahead of the cultish and very popular “My Favorite Things” or “A Love Supreme.” Weather Report and Ornette for illustrative purposes. “Song for My Father” is Silver’s most successful, but it changed Silver from a potential Ellingtonian composer to a mere riff master. “The Jazz Messengers” on Columbia (not Blue Note) is Horace’s best arranging, making a 5-man group sound like a big band (dig “Ecarole”) and with monster tunes like “Nica’s Dream” plus the redoubtable, untouchable Hank Mobley (1955-1965), not the harmonicist or pyrotechnician that Coltrane was but an extemporaneous, responsive melody-maker of the first order. Or on Blue Note, “Further Explorations” is also Horace at his best, with Art Farmer and Clifford Jordan plus compositions like “Moon Dreams.” Admittedly, for educational purposes, “Song for My Father” gives kids something they can all play.

  4. You’ve got to admit that “Rikki” has a slightly more interesting harmonic progression than “Song For My Father” though… lol

  5. I can get behind everything on this list. I would make one change on mine though. In place of Weather Report, I would probably go with something like Miles Davis’ “Bitches’ Brew” or “On the Corner.” They all predate “Heavy Weather,” many of the musician were Miles Davis alumni, and I think it’s unlikely that Weather Report would have ever existed without Miles.

    1. Point well taken, but I did already have two of Miles’s albums on the list. Not that having Miles make up 30% of the collection is wrong, but I did want to squeeze in a few more artists if I could, and I have a weakness for Jaco.

  6. The difference between “Bitches Brew” and “Heavy Weather” is that I listen to “Heavy Weather” about 10 times more often.

    I have low tolerance also for the jazz that predates Bird and Diz. I can appreciate the Armstrong and Ellington, and I have them, I just don’t enjoy listening to them.

  7. I love this list! I came here to be educated and, whilst I had listened to a lot of these before, the notes you gave will make me go and listen with open ears.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments that take a negative or confrontational tone are subject to email and name verification before being approved. In other words: no anonymous trolls allowed—take responsibility for your words.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.