Woodwind Doubler Census results, part 1: demographics

First things first: thank you thank you thank you to all who participated in the survey, and especially those who Tweeted, Facebooked, and otherwise spread the word. I was bowled over by the number and diversity of woodwind doublers who responded: top professionals, rank amateurs, and everyone in between, for a grand total of 187 responses. Wow! It has been fascinating to see your answers and read your comments. Over the next few weeks, I’ll be revealing what I’ve learned in installments. If you’re not already subscribed in some way, you can grab the RSS feed, sign up for updates by email, or follow me on Twitter. And you can see all related posts in one place, tagged as .

And now, with no further ado, I give you:

Woodwind Doubler Census results, part 1: Demographic background

Gender

Although a number of talented and versatile ladies responded, as a group we are mostly of the male persuasion.

Age

We represent a variety of vintages, with those in their 20s forming the largest group. And I was surprised at the number of under-20s who chimed in. It’s possible that the strong youthful contingent represented here has something to do with the survey being distributed via Internet, but I’d like to think that it also reflects a resurgence of interest in doubling among the rising generation of woodwind players. One web-savvy septuagenarian also stood up to be counted.

Continent

A large majority of respondents hail from the North American continent, though not-insignificant numbers responded from Europe and Australia/New Zealand. There were no respondents from South America, Africa, or Asia; it’s possible that this had something to do with the survey being available in English only.

(These numbers don’t add up to 100%, since not everyone answered this question.)

Residence type

About half of respondents make their home in a major city or metropolitan area.

Of those that claimed “other,” some explained that they live in small cities, in “exurbs,” or aboard cruise ships (really).

Location (free-form answer)

Some respondents gave more specific responses about where they live; I’m going to just dump them all here, sorted alphabetically but otherwise unedited:

  • 29301
  • Seattle, WA
  • Albany, NY
  • Albany, NY
  • Armidale, Australia
  • atlanta
  • Auburn, ME
  • Austin, TX
  • Australia
  • Australia, NSW, Newcastle
  • Birmingham, UK
  • Boston
  • Boston
  • Boston metro area
  • Bridgewater, MA
  • Brisbane, Australia
  • Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • Brussels, Belgium
  • Central Arizona
  • Central Florida
  • Champaign IL
  • Charleston, WV
  • Chicago
  • Chicago
  • Chicago area
  • Chicago, IL
  • Christchurch, New Zealand
  • Cleveland, MS
  • Cleveland, MS
  • Collingswood,NJ
  • Cotati, CA
  • Dallas
  • Dallas
  • Dallas, TX
  • Denton, TX
  • Denton, TX
  • Derbyshire, UK
  • Durango, CO
  • East Coast (NY,PA,NJ)
  • East/South Bay Area, CA
  • Easton, PA
  • Essex/East London UK
  • Florida
  • Florida
  • florida
  • Gainesville FL
  • Gaithersburg, MD
  • Germany
  • Greater Seattke area
  • Greeley, CO
  • Greenville, SC
  • Grove Hill, Alabama
  • GTA, Ontario, but currently working on a ship embarking from Fort Lauderdale and Civitavecchia (Rome)
  • Hampton Roads, VA
  • Honolulu
  • Houston metro area
  • Indiana
  • Jupiter, FL
  • Lancaster, PA
  • Las Vegas, NV
  • Leipzig, Germany
  • Los Angeles
  • Los Angeles
  • los angeles
  • Los Angeles CA
  • Macomb, Illinois (currently in grad school) – usually NYC
  • Macungie, PA
  • Mansfield, MA, USA
  • Marietta, GA
  • Melbourne
  • Melbourne, Australia
  • Miami, FL
  • Milwaukee, WI
  • Milwaukee, Wisconsin area
  • Minneapolis
  • Moscow, ID
  • Nampa Id
  • Nashville, TN
  • near NY City
  • New Brunswick
  • New England
  • New England
  • New England
  • New England
  • New York
  • New York City
  • New York City
  • New York City
  • North Mississippi
  • north of Manhattan, NY
  • Northern Illinois
  • Nova Scotia
  • NW Suburban Chicago
  • NYC/NJ area
  • Oklahoma
  • Oklahoma City (for graduate school) otherwise I’m from Minnesota
  • Omaha/Lincoln, NE
  • on the southern side of a valley in frankston
  • Oxford, MS
  • Perth, Western Australia
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Pittsburgh
  • Portland, OR area
  • Raleigh, NC
  • Rhode Island
  • Sacramento
  • Salem, MA (near Boston)
  • San Diego
  • San Francisco
  • San Francisco Bay area
  • San Jose
  • Sarajevo, Bosnia
  • SC
  • Seattle
  • Seattle
  • SF Bay Area
  • South Dakota
  • South Florida
  • South Florida
  • South Florida
  • South Mississippi, USA
  • South UK
  • South Yorkshire – England
  • Southern Ohio
  • Spokane WA
  • Spokane WA
  • Spokane, WA
  • Spokane, WA, USA
  • Staten Island/Dorm in Jersey City, NJ
  • Stratford, Canada
  • Tampa, FL
  • Toronto, Canada
  • Utah
  • Virginia
  • Washington DC
  • Washington DC area
  • Waukesha, WI (greater Milwaukee area)
  • West Virginia
  • Western US
  • WI
  • WI
  • Winder, GA
  • Winston Salem, NC

An interactive map of this data is available for your amusement. It’s generated automatically from the above data and has some errors and omissions.

Education

On the whole we’re pretty well educated, with nearly half having education beyond a masters degree. Note that this reflects education in any field, not just music.

Identity

Out of 187 respondents, 116 of you (62%) identified yourselves by name. I recognized many of your names because you have commented on my blog posts or otherwise communicated with me, and I recognized others of your names because I’m a fan of your work. 103 of you (55%), mostly the same crowd, indicated your main gig or school affiliation. The variety is impressive and fascinating. I’ll be keeping your names and affiliations private, but I appreciate hearing from you and it has been cool to see who’s out there.

Web presence

An impressive 48 respondents (26%) provided a website address. I’ll be checking those out and adding links, as appropriate, to my blogroll and lists of woodwind players’ websites in the coming weeks. Incidentally, you are welcome to send in that information at any time for possible inclusion at bretpimentel.com.

Stay tuned…

There’s much more data from the Great Woodwind Doubler Census of 2011 to come!

Similar Posts

  • Using electronic harmonization with woodwinds

    Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases, at no cost to you.

    In a recent recital I performed my own arrangement of Ravel’s Boléro for multiple woodwinds soloist using electronics, with piano and snare drum. I used electronics to try to approximate some of Ravel’s harmonies (and timbres), and used what in my mind are three different techniques, which I’ll try to outline here.

    In performance, I used the BOSS GT-1000CORE guitar multi-effects unit to do most of the heavy lifting. I did find that it had difficulty tracking my flute playing (though, surprisingly, it did better with piccolo), so I used an Electro-Harmonix Pitch Fork + to assist with that instrument in particular. I also used a BOSS SY-200 to try to create some non-woodwind tone colors. There are plenty of other equipment options that can achieve similar effects, but you’re on your own to read the manuals.

    All of this was done with a microphone rather than pickups, which was less complicated for quick instrument switches, but did make it difficult to get relatively isolated woodwind sounds into the electronics, which ultimately caused problems with the audibility of some of the electronic sounds.

    The warts-and-all live performance is available on my YouTube channel, but I’ll provide some clearer, isolated examples here. For rehearsal numbers in the orchestral score, I’m referring to the Durand Edition on IMSLP.

    Technique 1: parallel intervals

    At rehearsal mark 8 in the score, horn and celeste play the A theme in octaves, with two piccolos playing in parallel a perfect fifth and a major tenth above the celeste’s highest octave, perhaps in imitation of a pipe organ’s mixture stop.

    To achieve this harmony with electronics, I played the upper piccolo part “live,” and routed the piccolo’s sound into the GT-1000CORE where I split it into two separate signal paths. One got transposed down using a digital pitch shifter to create the second piccolo part. The other got transposed down to the melody pitch and split into octaves, then routed through the SY-200 to turn the sound into something vaguely celeste-like.

    Since the intervals are strictly parallel, this is a pretty straightforward use of pitch shifting: whatever note I play on the piccolo gets transposed to the specified intervals.

    Technique 2: smart harmonization

    At rehearsal mark 16, a thickly-orchestrated ensemble of woodwinds, brass, and strings plays the A theme in harmony. I opted to play this portion on soprano saxophone, thickened and harmonized with a synthesized string section.

    Since the harmony in this section is largely diatonic, I used the GT-1000CORE’s smart harmonizer. I added voices a diatonic fourth and diatonic sixth below in the key of G (like a first-inversion triad), which tracks with the notes in the first part of the theme. But there’s a moment in the first part that uses F-natural instead of F-sharp, and the second part of the melody uses F-naturals exclusively, so I used the unit’s footswitches to change to the key of C major as needed. I routed all of this through the SY-200 to change the three soprano saxophones into a string section sound, with the “live” soprano remaining audible in the room.

    For the key switching, I set one footswitch as a “momentary” switch, so it changes the key just while I’m pressing it, and another as a “toggle” switch, so I can press and release it and the key remains changed. This gives me some helpful options for live performance.

    Technique 3: smart harmonization with custom scales

    The smart harmonizer works well out of the box as long as you want to use notes of a major scale (or mode thereof), but at rehearsal mark 15 Ravel’s harmonization is more complicated than that. Luckily, the GT-1000CORE supports smart harmonization with custom “scales.” What this really means is that I can tell the unit that any time I play a certain pitch, it should add one or more pitches that I can specify arbitrarily. I can add whatever pitches I like to each note of the chromatic scale.

    I chose to play this section on clarinet, using the electronics to turn it into a 3-part clarinet section. During the first phrase, the melody pitches are harmonized in a consistent way: every time there’s a melody concert B-flat it’s harmonized with a G and an E, every time there’s a melody C it’s harmonized with an A and an F, every time there’s a melody E it’s harmonized with a C and a G, and so forth. I can just tell the effects unit which harmony notes to add to each melody note.

    But things change in the first half of the second phrase: melody B-flat is now harmonized with G and D, and C is now harmonized with A and E. To accommodate this I have to create a second custom “scale,” and use a footswitch to activate it at the right time. To finish the second phrase requires a third scale, engaged with another footswitch.

    Because of the flexibility of the custom scale system, I can recreate harmonies that use a variety of intervals. With a little analysis I can figure out where the scale changes need to be (basically anywhere a given melody pitch is harmonized in a new way).

    Additional thoughts

    There are some limitations to using pitch shifters and harmonizers, depending on your equipment. Each virtual pitch shifter and harmonizer in the GT-1000CORE can only add two voices, though by (virtually) splitting the audio signal into multiple paths and passing each through its own shifter/harmonizer I can build thicker chords.

    When trying to reproduce specific harmonies written by a composer, there may be some decisions to make to balance accuracy with practicality. Serendipitously, most of Ravel’s harmony translated fairly easily to the effects unit’s capabilities. But there were a few spots where I decided that certain chord voicings were close enough, and that I didn’t need to complicate things with one more custom scale plus the corresponding onstage footwork.

    As I’ve mentioned previously, I’m more interested in electronic effects that give my woodwinds new capabilities, like polyphony, than in just adding some distortion or echo (though those are also fun). Enjoy!

  • Sam Newsome on not doubling

    Sam Newsome asks the question, “Can You Double And Still Be A Great Soprano Saxophonist?”

    As I see it, if you play the soprano using a set-up that’s comparable to a much larger horn, you’re not dealing with the soprano on it’s own terms. It’s being treated as an extension of a much larger horn, and not as a separate entity.

    Go check it out.

  • David Erato on his clarinet “journey”

    David Erato, a Wisconsin-based woodwind doubler and teacher, describes the motivation behind his year-long “journey” to improve his clarinet chops:

    The idea as a “doubler” is to make whatever instrument is in your hand not feel like a foreign object. One should really study the instrument as if it is the only instrument you play. Practice the same method books, etudes, solos, as a clarinetist in a symphony once did.

    David devised a plan to work his way through a book of technical etudes, and carried it out. His plan was based on the a similar system he had used as a university saxophone student. The result?

    I can say after all of that, I really do feel like I’ve taken my technique game up several notches on clarinet.  It may be hard to believe, but about half way through the book I felt more connected to the instrument.  Even though I was in more difficult keys, larger interval jumps became easier than when I started.  By the end of it, I didn’t have to think much about playing 4ths in the key of D# harmonic minor.

    It’s worth reading the whole thing. There’s one key point from David’s story that I’ve discussed here before, but which is worth restating: as a woodwind doubler, you have to be a beginner on each instrument. David had already completed a technique-building regimen on the saxophone, prescribed by a good saxophone teacher, but hadn’t done so yet on the clarinet. Many of us make the mistake of thinking that such things transfer automatically. They don’t!

    I know that many of my readers are college students and/or educators, and may have some discretionary time coming up when the spring semester ends. What fundamental techniques can you spend the summer shoring up?

  • Does woodwind doubling ruin your embouchure?

    Nope.

    We use our embouchure muscles for all kinds of things: facial expressions, speech, eating, kissing. Do any of those things “ruin” your embouchure? Of course not. The embouchure is made up of very flexible, agile muscles that are very capable of carrying out multiple tasks.

    When people (almost always non-doublers) express concern about embouchure ruin, most of the time what they seem to be talking about is tension, or sensitivity loss, or buildup of callused tissue, or maybe strengthening the “wrong” muscles. If playing any woodwind instrument is giving you these kinds of problems, you are playing it wrong. Your embouchure for any and every woodwind instrument should be relaxed, balanced, and pain-free. Get some lessons with a qualified teacher, quickly.

    Woodwind doubling presents real challenges. No need to invent fictional ones!

  • Problems of wind controller sounds for classical performance

    I’ve been working on a little Baroque repertoire on the EWI in preparation for an upcoming recital. It’s not especially common to play recital-type music on wind controllers—they are far more often used in jazz and popular styles—but I think the instrument has great potential for “classical” performance. (I mean “classical” here, and throughout this post, in the record store sense, not in the more specific musicological sense.)

    My EWI is customized with the really excellent Patchman soundbank which seems to be more or less de rigeur for EWI players. It has 100 different sounds designed especially for wind controllers. But it has been difficult to find sounds that work well for me for the music that I’m trying to play.

    Before I continue, I should pause to point out that I’m not at all criticizing the Patchman bank, which I’ve unabashedly recommended to everyone I know. These sounds are fantastic. And really, some of the ones that seem worst-suited to this particular application are some of my favorite ones that I’ve used in other situations.

    There are also plenty of additional sources for sounds. I personally like the convenience of on-board sounds, rather than plugging into external modules or a laptop, though those are certainly viable options. I also am personally uninterested in playing sampled or acoustically-modeled sounds that attempt to mimic the sounds of “real” acoustic instruments; I want to play a synthesizer as a synthesizer, not as a substitute for something else.

    So I’m looking for good synthy sounds that align with the aesthetics of classical performance. But many of the sounds that work really well for other styles of music have features that don’t fit classical music ideals of wind playing. For example, some of the sounds:

    Read More “Problems of wind controller sounds for classical performance”

  • Should I buy something new?

    Changing your instrument, mouthpiece, headjoint, reeds, etc. on a frequent basis isn’t productive, but sticking with the same equipment forever isn’t a virtue either. Here are some questions to ask yourself (or a trusted teacher or colleague) when you start feeling the itch to spend money on shiny new things:

    • Does this new equipment make it easier or more comfortable to do what I do? Or am I hoping it will magically endow me with abilities I didn’t have before?
    • Does this materially improve some concrete aspect of my playing, like intonation, response, dynamic range or finger movement? Is it an improvement that is more subjective, fleeting, or malleable, like tone quality? (Tone quality isn’t nothing when purchasing woodwind gear, but it’s not everything, either.)
    • Does this really change how I sound? Does it change how it feels to play, physically? Does it change how it feels to play, emotionally? (All of these can be valid reasons to change, but it’s worth sorting out what’s really changing.)
    • Is this new equipment appealing in some way that is more about appearance or cachet than playability? Is that worth the investment to me? Would I be sacrificing some playability for bling factor?
    • How did I come to desire this particular item? Was I influenced by advertising, celebrity endorsements, a commissioned salesperson, an internet stranger, or someone/something else that might have motivations separate from my success? Was I happy with my current setup before I learned of this product’s existence?

    If you’re currently a student, be sure to check in with your teacher before any new gear purchase!

2 Comments

    1. P.s. Thanks for linking to my site! Sorry to everyone that tries to visit… I didn’t install the WP update properly so I’ll be down for a couple of days :o(, but it will be back up ASAP! I’m currently somewhere in the middle of the Atlantic ocean so internet is a bit dodgy/expensive!

      Cheers!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments that take a negative or confrontational tone are subject to email and name verification before being approved. In other words: no anonymous trolls allowed—take responsibility for your words.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.