Jazz opportunities for woodwind players: learn the saxophone

Jazz clarinetist (and saxophonist!) Eddie Daniels. Photo, Professor Bop

I’ve been having a great time directing the university jazz band this year (alas, a temporary assignment). The group performed recently for some talented high school musicians from around the state, the kind of students I would like to recruit. After the performance, I was approached by no less than three of them, each expressing an interest in playing in the group in the future. None of them play instruments typical of jazz big band arrangements.

I’ve had this happen with private students, too. I once met with a very young and enthusiastic clarinetist and her mother. They explained to me that the young clarinetist was being excluded from her middle school jazz band because she didn’t play a “jazz” instrument. Their plan was for her to study clarinet with me, and to get so good that the jazz band director would “just have to” accept her into the group.

The clarinet, of course, does have a noble history in jazz music (even big bands), as does the flute, and, less frequently, the double reeds. And don’t get me wrong here—I love playing and listening to jazz on all those instruments, and would love to see every young woodwind player, regardless of instrument, get the chance to participate.Ā But there are some practical barriers.

Students who want to learn to play jazz need opportunities to play in jazz groups. The big band format, by far the most likely jazz ensemble to be found in a school setting, has crystallized into a format with pretty specific instrumentation, and the saxophonists are the only woodwind players who get in on the fun. Parts for flute and clarinet pop up occasionally, but almost always written as a double in what is predominantly a saxophone part. Some school jazz band directors make the extra effort to include a larger variety of instruments, transposing parts themselves or purchasing special everyone-is-included arrangements. This approach of course has significant merits, but also robs the players of “jazz” instruments of an experience that is more authentic. And the stronger the group is, the less likely it is to use a non-standard instrumentation.

Aspiring jazz players, can, of course, look beyond the school system for opportunities, but the grass may not be any greener. Neighborhood garage bands or other non-instructional ensembles in the community can provide valuable experience, but would a group like that care to include a beginning jazz player? Especially one who plays a “non-jazz” instrument?

For this reason, my approach has been to tell my non-saxophonist students who are interested in jazz that the shortest way from here to there is to pick up the saxophone. It hurts a little to tell them that. But by approaching jazz study as a saxophonist, a woodwind player opens up a world of opportunities and resources that otherwise just aren’t available. My university group, like most, has a set instrumentation. One of my oboe students has been a longtime member of the group, playing baritone saxophone. She gets jazz experience that most oboists don’t. But if she didn’t play at least a little bit of saxophone, she would be out of luck.

Clarinetists and flutists who are into jazz can become particularly valuable to a jazz group as members of the saxophone section. It’s not uncommon for an advanced school big band to play arrangements that call for those instruments woodwind doubles. Nor is it uncommon for the saxophonists to have a serious lack of ability to play those parts. A flute or clarinet specialist who is also a strong saxophonist can really save the day.

A handful of musicians have, of course, made names for themselves as jazz players on non-saxophone woodwind instruments. But most of them also have also played the saxophone.

To flutists, clarinetists, oboists, and bassoonists who want to play jazz, I encourage you to continue working hard at your instrument and to seek out recordings and concerts of the top jazz players on that instrument. But also consider taking a few saxophone lessons and getting access to some great opportunities.

Here are just a very few of my favorite jazz woodwind players. Note that all also play saxophone!

Flute Hubert Laws
Lew Tabackin
Clarinet Eddie Daniels
Ken Peplowski
Don Byron
Oboe Paul McCandless
Charles Pillow
Bassoon Paul Hanson
Ray Pizzi

Similar Posts

  • Peter Hilliard on contracting woodwind doublers

    Photo, danifeb

    Peter Hilliard has a nice blog, Music Directing the School Musical. It doesn’t offer any information about who Peter Hilliard is (presumably this guy), not even contact information*. But he does seem to know a thing or two about putting on a musical, and, in a recent post, offers some advice about hiring musicians. Here’s a little of what he has to say about hiring woodwind players—I do suggest reading the whole thing.

    The actual numbers (Reed I, Reed II, etc.) vary widely from show to show, but if you look through your books, you’ll see the following is generally true:

    There is a book (usually Reed I) that looks like this: Flute and Piccolo normally, sometimes Clarinet, Soprano and/or Alto Sax. Normally this book is very flute heavy. In old shows, sometimes it’s only flute, with no doubling. Hire somebody with a good flute embouchure, not a clarinet or sax player who plays flute with an airy tone. Have the guy who dabbles on flute play the book with all the second or 3rd flute parts. For some reason, the alto flute got really popular from the 70s through the 80s, but beware. 1) you’ll never hear it. 2) You’ll never find one! I swear, I called every instrument rental house in Philadelphia and South Jersey for a show recently and nobody had one. 3) your player will pass out from too little oxygen to the brain.

    I can’t say that I’ve ever had a musical director volunteer to round up instruments for me—I need to work for this guy! By the way, keep that alto flute embouchure focused to avoid passing out, and make sure you’re playing right into the mic so the sound crew has something to work with. Read More “Peter Hilliard on contracting woodwind doublers”

  • Reader email: maintaining doubles

    Photo, nigel_appleton

    I love getting good questions by email:

    I have a question about maintenance on your doubles. Once you feel like you have a good foundation and can play them at a high level, how do you maintain that in your practice routine?

    There’s no great answer to your question. Playing one instrument “at a high level” takes lots of time and commitment, and playing several just multiplies the requirement.

    I don’t know if I really play any of my instruments at a high level, but here are a few things that seem to help me:
    • Spend some time living in the world of each instrument. Read books and journals, buy and listen to recordings, attend concerts, masterclasses, and conferences. When I start to feel like I’m really getting a handle on an instrument, it’s time to go immerse myself in it and realize what is really possible. Last month I went to the John Mack Oboe Camp, and was blown away by the great playing I heard there. It made me really aware of some things that needed improvement in my own playing. I got to participate in some masterclasses and got some great suggestions.
    • Keep yourself challenged. I do a faculty recital each year for my college teaching job, and I try to crank things up by a small notch each year in terms of difficulty. Not because difficult music is necessarily better, but because I need to push myself. Find something you can’t quite do—a repertoire piece, a fundamental technique issue, an advanced or extended technique—and work on it until you can do it.
    • Focus on fundamentals. There just isn’t time in the day to give each instrument the 3-4 hours of practice they need. What time I do have, I try to really pack with long tones, scales, and other really fundamental stuff, and make everything as perfect, polished, and controlled as possible.
    • As a practical matter, I find that I need an hour or more with an instrument to make any progress when I’m practicing, and I need to practice it a few days in a row to get some momentum going. So if I’ve only got a couple of hours, it’s usually not useful to cram in half a dozen instruments. I try to rotate them in such a way that each instrument gets practiced for a few days in a row, then gets a few days off. Something like:
      • Monday: flute, oboe, clarinet
      • Tues: oboe, clarinet, bassoon
      • Wed: clarinet, bassoon, saxophone
      • Thurs: bassoon, saxophone, flute
      • Fri: saxophone, flute, oboe
    I hope that helps. Good luck!
  • Jazz recital videos, August 2017

    This year I played all jazz at my Delta State University faculty recital. Program and some selected videos are below.

    I’m very much a part-time jazz player, so it was fun to spend the summer trying to get my chops in shape to play tunes in a variety of styles on a variety of instruments. This was my new record for number of instruments on a recital: flute, oboe, clarinet, bass clarinet, bassoon (electricĀ bassoon), soprano/alto/tenor saxophones, and EWI, 9 in all. I’ve written previously about the challenges of improvising on multiple instruments, which I suspect might be surprising to non-doublers or non-improvisers.

    An additional challenge is that I live in a small town in an isolated area, so I had to bring in some rhythm section players from out of town and rehearsal time was extremely limited. Enjoy the videos warts and all.

    I have previously done some things with bassoon and electronics, but I took that to a new level this time around with a Little Jake pickup and a few new effects pedals. This was lots of fun and I’m already brainstorming how I can use the Little Jake with some other instruments.

    The pedalboard setup I used for electric bassoon and EWI

    Program

     

  • Creativity, hard work, and beginning jazz improvisation

    I occasionally teach a university course in jazz improvisation, geared toward beginning improvisers. Sometimes I think prospective students are afraid to sign up because they don’t consider themselves already to be musically creative. On the other hand, I have some students enroll in the class with unrealistic expectations about the results, thinking that they will learn all the tricks and secrets and be ready for some fantasy gig.

    It doesn’t make sense to avoid taking French 101 because “I don’t speak any French”—you’re missing the point of an introductory course. But it also isn’t likely that by the end of the semester you’ll be ready to wow everyone at the smartest dinner parties in Paris.

    Photo, alphadesigner
    Photo, alphadesigner

    The good-news/bad-news is that most of what happens in a beginning improvisation class doesn’t feel creative or spontaneous at all. In my course, we do a lot of drilling of scales, arpeggios, patterns, and “licks,” and then trying to execute them successfully in a pre-planned way over a set of chord changes. The same happens in your first-semester French class: you memorize some basic phrases by rote, and try to use them in the right order in very structured “conversations.” At some point you get some very restricted freedom: you have to say what colorĀ le chat is, but you get to pick if he isĀ noir orĀ blanc.Ā Similarly, in my class you might get to decide which of your two memorized “two-five-one” licks to use over the first four bars of the bridge, or whether to start that digital pattern on the root of the chord or the fifth, but that’s about it. Limited options don’t mean you aren’t really improvising (or speaking French), it just means you don’t have a lot of vocabulary to work with yet.

    I know that this rubs some improvisers the wrong way: I shouldn’t be regurgitating pre-packaged licks! I should be developing my own “thing!” For those people, I suggest you read a biography of any great improvising musician and find out what they did in the early stages of developing their thing. Or just try speaking some French: no need for grammar study or vocabulary lists! Do your thing!

    For those who consider themselves creativity-deficient: youĀ can learn to improvise in a systematic way—it’s not something you’re born with (or without). I’ll teach you some existing vocabulary and some techniques for making your own, and then you can start putting them together in ways that make sense to you. You’re being creative!

    For those hoping to learn some “tricks:” the only useful trick I can teach you is to take the techniques from the class and hit the practice rooms. There aren’t any shortcuts to improvising well. It will require hard work over the course of many years. But the process can be a lot of fun!

  • Woodwind Doubler Census 2021 results, part 1: demographics

    Thanks to all who participated in my 2021 woodwind doubling survey, and to those who helped spread the word. I’m releasing the results in installments, so be sure to use my social media links, RSS feeds, etc. to keep up.

    I got 284 responses, an improvement over 2011’s 187. The numbers for each of these questions don’t necessarily add up to exactly that number, since not everybody responded to every question.

    Gender identity

    I provided more options for gender identity than in 2011’s survey. Here’s the breakdown. (Percentages are of those who answered the question.)

    2021 Data
    Male22278%
    Female4917%
    Female, Transgender1~0%
    Nonbinary/nonconforming104%
    Transgender, Nonbinary/nonconforming1~0%
    2011 Data
    Male14678%
    Female4122%

    Age

    As was the case 10 years ago, the numbers skew toward the younger end. I’m not sure if this is affected by the survey being distributed primarily online. No respondents claimed to be younger than teenaged or older than in their 70s.

    2021 Data
    Teenage228%
    20s7225%
    30s6724%
    40s4014%
    50s4114%
    60s3512%
    70s62%
    2011 Data
    Younger than 20191%
    20s5410%
    30s3129%
    40s3617%
    50s3319%
    60s1218%
    70s16%

    Region

    I provided options for this that broke down by continent. A few of you island dwellers responded with “other” and specified locations in Oceania and the Caribbean. I probably need to rethink this question for 2031, but for purposes of data reporting I have lumped everyone together into continents for now.

    The continued absence of responses from Africa and South America may be related to language barriers and/or other factors. I did get a few responses from Asia this year, which I didn’t in 2011.

    2021 Data
    Asia31%
    Australia114%
    Europe207%
    North America24988%
    2011 Data
    Australia116%
    Europe126%
    North America16287%

    Which of these best describes where you live?

    The “city, but not a ‘major’ one” option was added based on feedback from the 2011 survey. A few of you used the “other” option to explain more complicated living situations (such as multiple locations), and for reporting purposes I’ve taken the liberty of lumping those into the categories I thought were the closest match.

    2021 Data
    major city or metropolitan area12745%
    city, but not a “major” one6924%
    suburb or exurb6322%
    rural or remote area248%
    2011 Data
    major city or metropolitan area9350%
    suburban area6635%
    rural or remote area2312%
    other53%

    Describe your current level of formal education (in any field).

    “Less than high school diploma” is a new option this yea. The categories in the graph are abbreviated; the full text from the survey is in the data table.

    2021 dATA
    Less than high school diploma83%
    High school diploma or equivalent62%
    Some college3312%
    Bachelors degree7025%
    Some graduate school186%
    Masters degree10337%
    Doctorate3813%
    Other degree type or comparable certification62%
    2011 Data
    High school diploma or equivalent84%
    Some college2815%
    Bachelors degree5932%
    Some graduate school169%
    Masters degree5328%
    Doctorate169%
    Other degree type or comparable certification63%

    Thanks again for your participation and stay tuned for more survey results.

6 Comments

  1. Great advice!

    As a doubler, I started out with strings, and starting learning oboe in high school, and later picking up flute and clarinet. I’d always thought playing in jazz band would be fun, and a better musical outlet at my school. I asked my parents for a sax, got a good mouthpiece (still using today…) and some books from my band director, and was in jazz band a week later, getting solos on flute, piccolo and violin oddly enough! It was a great experience, and for a well rounded player on any woodwind instrument, the saxophone is going to be an easier instrument to pick up and learn the basics of, although in hindsight I think that the oboe skills helped the most of any of the other woodwinds. The next year, since I had experience on it, I ended up playing some bass too, and learned a lot about chord structure and the bass line’s importance in general.

  2. Hey Bret,
    Thanks for writing this post. I started on clarinet and then picked up sax pretty soon after that (to play jazz). You’ll generally get more interesting parts in concert band and orchestra on clarinet/flute/oboe, etc compared to saxophone.

    But in jazz, saxophone does seem to be the woodwind of choice.

    That doesn’t mean you need to give up the other woodwind.
    Playing in a few music groups at school can be fun.

    And I did take a couple of clarinet solos in jazz band when the arrangements called for it.

    Playing saxophone will get you in the jazz world, and after middle school and high school when you’ve developed some musicality, you’ll have more opportunities to play jazz and other styles of music on the ‘less common’ in jazz woodwinds. That will actually make you stand out a bit more. Jazz bassoon isn’t a sound you hear everyday.

    Have you heard Anat Cohen Bret? I would add her to your jazz clarinet list! Great musician.

    -Neal

  3. Totally agree. “Jazz”, especially in school, means trumpet, trombone and saxophone.

    I also agree (as someone who started on sax and later learned flute, clarinet, and bassoon) that the person for whom the sax is the double will have a huge advantage when it’s time to play those double parts.

  4. My first jazz band experience came in the form of a “stage band.” The director had clarinet and flute players on sax for the band; but next year, he allowed flute. It’s been two years since I’ve seen the band, but I have heard that he still allows flute players in the band. I suppose it depends on the number of players one has available.

  5. As a jazz musician who finds expression with both clarinet and sax, it’s hard for me to argue with you here Bret. Your point that the saxophone is the reed of choice in jazz — especially orchestrated jazz — is absolutely true. But because I can’t resist chiming in, allow me to emphasize your point by adding that even during the hey-day of jazz clarinet, even the most famous players also honked away on saxes — at least at the start of their careers. For example:

    Benny Goodman played alto, tenor and baritone sax. An excruciating video of this, long before he was the King of Swing, can bee seen here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrI5oW2ykuU. Perhaps it serves as inspiration to beginning players!

    Artie Shaw started out on alto. Woody Herman did too.

    And just to cloud the mix even more: Arguably the greatest of jazz tenor men, Lester Young, played clarinet in his unique style throughout his career, but is rarely remembered for his work on that instrument.

    So there you are! Seems that the greats will inevitably make music, regardless of what horn they’re holding — but they don’t get far with out a sax. Perhaps a good example to follow.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments that take a negative or confrontational tone are subject to email and name verification before being approved. In other words: no anonymous trolls allowed—take responsibility for your words.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.