Dvorák’s “New World” and jazz music: Heirs to a common heritage

In 1892, Czech composer Antonín Dvorák came to the United States. He came at the invitation of a Mrs. Jeannette Thurber, a wealthy music lover who wanted him to head up her latest pet project—a conservatory of music meant to rival the famous conservatories of Europe.

Dr. Dvorák, already known for his use of traditional Czech musical elements in his compositions, arrived in the New World to find it rich with ethnic music. He was particularly impressed with the spirituals of the black slaves:

I am now satisfied that the future music of this country must be founded upon what are called the Negro melodies. This must be the real foundation of any serious and original school of composition to be developed in the United States. When I first came here last year I was impressed with this idea and it has developed into a settled conviction. These beautiful and varied themes are the product of the soil. They are American. . . . In the Negro melodies of America I discover all that is needed for a great and noble school of music. . . . There is nothing in the whole range of composition that cannot be supplied with themes from this source.


Though his comments were controversial in his own day, Dvorák’s insight can hardly be lost on the modern music fan. The black slaves’ spirituals gave rise to the “blues,” and blues, in turn, spawned a host of other musical genres. Little popular music since 1900 can claim independence from the influence of the spiritual. Ted Gioia names “a few: gospel, . . . soul, rap, minstrel songs, Broadway musicals, ragtime, jazz, blues, R&B, rock, samba, cumbia, calypso, even some contemporary operatic and symphonic music.” Dvorák said, “Apparently I am to show [America] the path to the promised land and the kingdom of a new, independent art; in short, to create national music.” Dvorák would never know how successful he had been at identifying the roots of American music.

While in America, Dvorák wrote what would become perhaps his most popular work, his Symphony no. 9 (“From the New World”). “It is the spirit of the Negro . . . melodies which I have endeavoured to reproduce in my new symphony,” he said of the composition. Dvorák’s themes are thought to have been inspired largely by spirituals he learned from Harry Burleigh, a black man who studied composition under Dr. Dvorák at the American conservatory.

Leon Botstein suggests that Dvorák’s influence on his students at the National Conservatory may have begun roots of an American musical style that would later be “audible in the music of Copland, Gershwin, and Ellington.” Of those three, Duke Ellington was a true jazz composer. Aaron Copland and George Gershwin arguably were not, but certainly showed the influence of jazz in their music. Whether or not the music of these quintessentially American composers was really of Dvorák’s lineage, the common ancestry of this music and Dvorák’s New World symphony is clear.

It is not surprising that Dvorák’s New World symphony bears a close family resemblance to jazz music, since they are of a common extraction. The Largo movement in particular, famous for its distinctive opening theme introduced by the English horn, is the symphony’s most raw application of spiritual melody, and shows the closest kinship to jazz. It is interesting to note that jazz pianist Art Tatum, and other jazz musicians since, have appropriated this theme as a jazz tune in itself. (Sources disagree whether the theme existed as a song called “Goin’ Home” before Dvorák wrote his symphony, or whether the title and lyrics were added later to an original theme, but Dvorák insisted that all melodies in the 9th Symphony were his own, merely inspired by existing tunes.)

The “Goin’ Home” theme is twelve measures long, with three four-bar phrases, an immediately apparent parallel with the common twelve-bar blues form. Further evidence that this similarity is no coincidence is revealed through harmonic analysis. The movement from tonic to subdominant in the fifth bar is a defining characteristic of the blues form.

Example 1: Largo
Example 1: Largo, first theme ("Goin' Home").

The melody of this theme is based on a major pentatonic scale (although the seventh scale degree does appear in the second phrase). The pentatonic scale is traditionally a favorite melodic device of jazz and blues musicians. According to John Clapham, Dvorák’s visit to the United States provided a “powerful stimulus” to use the pentatonic scale in writing themes. The spiritual “Swing Low, Sweet Chariot” is said to have been Dvorák’s favorite, and its strict pentatonicism seems almost quoted in a theme from the first movement.

Example 2a Swing Low, Sweet Chariot; 2b Adagio, m. 149.
Example 2a Swing Low, Sweet Chariot; 2b Adagio, m. 149.

Another common trait inherited by Dvorák’s Largo theme and jazz music is the uneven “swing” rhythm, represented by Dvorák with the dotted eighth note followed by a sixteenth note. In the second phrase, the clarinets play a harmony line to the English horn melody, but their part pits “straight” eighth notes against the dotted-eighth/sixteenth pattern, further emphasizing the melody’s irregular rhythm. An American music historian wrote that Dvorák had been “greatly intrigued by the lively niggerish swing of American popular music.” Though the language of the comment is disturbing to modern sensibilities, it intimates that Dvorák’s use of swing-style rhythm was intentional.

Call-and-response, another legacy of the spiritual songs inherited by jazz, also appears in Dvorák’s Largo movement. A striking example is the final measure of the English horn’s theme, immediately echoed by the clarinet.

The second theme employs, as does the first, plagal harmony similar to that common in jazz and blues. The first two measures alternate between the tonic C# minor chord and subdominant F# minor.

Example 3 Largo, second theme.
Example 3 Largo, second theme.

John Clapham points out that the leading tone (B#) is conspicuously absent; the B-natural is used prominently and without apology. Jazz composers and musicians tend to favor the Dorian mode for expression of minor tonalities. Changing subdivision of a constant pulse, another favorite device of jazz musicians, is also evident here. In measures 51-52 alone, the pulse is divided into two, three, four, and five parts.

A third theme, introduced in measure 54, is accompanied by a pizzicato “walking” line in the string bass. Though the walking bass ubiquitous in jazz today did not develop until the 1930’s, the similarity here is striking and perhaps telling. The rhythmic drive of the walking bass line is a perfect foil to spiritual-influenced melody, as Dvorák and any jazz bassist would agree.

Dvorák’s New World symphony foreshadowed the overwhelming influence of the black slave songs in forming a truly American musical style. Jack Sullivan quotes former president Bill Clinton as saying that jazz is “America’s classical music,” and goes on to point out that such an idea has been “taken for granted by European composers for nearly a century.” Dvorák’s belief that American music would grow from the songs of slaves proved true.

Notes

John Taylor, “From the New World,” Music Journal (January 1978), 34.

Joseph Horowitz, “Dvorák and the New World: A Concentrated Moment,” in Dvorák and His World, ed. Michael Beckerman (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993), 96.

John Clapham, “Dvorák and the Impact of America,” The Music Review 15:1-4 (1954), 203.

Jack Sullivan, New World Symphonies: How American Culture Changed European Music, (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999), 1.

Ted Gioia, The History of Jazz (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), 8.

Letter written by Dvorák, 1892. Addressee unknown. Quoted in Rob Cowan, “Dvorák’s New World Symphony,” Gramophone 77:918 (September 1999), 34.

Clapham “Impact,” 203.

Tom Morgan, Jazz Roots: Spirituals and Harry Burleigh [online document] (accessed 31 May 2002); available from http://www.jass.com/spirituals.html; Internet.

Leon Botstein, “Reversing the Critical Tradition: Innovation, Modernity, and Ideology in the Work and Career of Antonín Dvorák,” in Dvorák and His World, 46.

New World Symphony: Antonín Dvorák, 1893 [online document] (accessed 31 May 2002); available from http://www.artsworld.com/music-dance/works/m-o/new-world-symphony-antonin-dvorak.html; Internet.

John Clapham, “Evolution of Dvorák’s Symphony ‘From the New World,'” The Musical Quarterly (April 1958), 169.

Gioia, 13.

Jerry Coker, Elements of the Jazz Language for the Developing Improvisor (Miami: CPP/Belwin, 1991), 45.

Clapham “Impact,” 209.

Miroslav Ivanov, In Dvorák’s Footsteps: Musical Journeys in the New World, trans. Stania Slahor, ed. Leon Karel (Kirksville, Missouri: The Thomas Jefferson University Press, 1995), 173.

John Fordham, Jazz (London: Dorling Kindersley, 1993), 131.

H. L. Mencken, “Dvorák (1841-1904): An American Symphony,” in Dvorák and His World, 184.

Fordham, 127.

Gioia, 13.

Clapham “Impact,” 209.

Coker, 45.

Sullivan, 191.

Similar Posts

  • Thinking through scales

    My university woodwind students have to pass a scale exam as one of the requirements to progress in their degree program. They have to be able to play major scales and three forms of minor scales, plus arpeggios, through the “full range” of the instrument, from memory.

    Many of my students learned their major scales in their school band programs, well enough to have most of them in muscle memory. But some of them are less familiar with the minor scales.

    It can be a little overwhelming to keep track of 48 different scales. With plenty of accurate repetitions my students can get to the point of muscle memory for all 48. But in the meantime sometimes they get stuck trying to remember the right notes for the next scale, or get mixed up and play the wrong one.

    I find it very helpful to have a mental roadmap for thinking through the next scale, and especially so if I can relate it to something I already have in muscle memory. My map might go something like this, but there are lots of possibilities:

    • C major scale: already in muscle memory, little or no “thinking” needed. As I play, notice the first, third, and fifth scale degrees, so I can use them in the next step.
    • C major arpeggio: first, third, and fifth degrees of the scale I just played.
    • C natural minor scale: since it’s a minor scale, I’m going to lower the third from E to E-flat. And E-flat major is the relative key to C minor, and I have E-flat major in my muscle memory, so I can play that same pattern of notes without too much thought.
    • C harmonic minor scale: now that I’ve got C natural minor under my fingers, I just need to change one note to produce the harmonic minor: B-flat becomes B-natural.
    • C melodic minor, ascending: this one is just like the C major scale I played a minute ago, but lower the E to E-flat.
    • C melodic minor, descending: this one is just like the C natural minor scale (related to E-flat major) that I played a minute ago. Notice the first, third, and fifth scale degrees, so I can use them in the next step.
    • C minor arpeggio: first, third, and fifth degrees of the scale I just played.

    Another approach that appeals to some of my students is to think in terms of scale degrees: start with the major scale that’s already in muscle memory, and remember that for, say, harmonic minor, you have to lower the third and the sixth.

    Having an organized way of thinking through the scales helps prevent the paralysis and overwhelm of trying to conjure up the whole scale from nothing. When my students take their exam, nobody minds if they take a few moments to think before they start playing, but getting stuck mid-scale would be a problem.

    As you get better and faster at thinking through the scales, a good way to push yourself is to use a metronome, and limit yourself to a pre-set amount of time before the next scale starts. Maybe a certain number of beats (or, ultimately, zero beats) before jumping into the next one. If that doesn’t go well in the practice space, you know that particular transition is a problem spot, and can reorganize your efforts accordingly.

    Happy practicing!

  • Getting the most out of practicing your scales

    When you practice scales (or arpeggios or, really, any other technical material) it’s not really about the scales. Nobody wants to buy tickets to hear you play scales.

    Scale and technical practice develop the fundamental technique you need for doing more interesting things. You don’t learn multiplication tables or French verb conjugations so you can recite multiplication tables or French verb conjugations. You learn them so you can file your taxes or build a Mars rover, or order pastries or read Proust.

    The habits you develop when practicing scales—the building blocks of your technique—will be with you in everything you play. So take them very seriously:

    • Go slowly, and be as precise and controlled as you can. You will work on scales for your whole life as a musician, so there’s no rush to get them up to a certain tempo. Don’t waste time playing them sloppily.
    • Listen deeply to the sound of each note. Scales are a great chance to understand and map the tone, pitch, and response nuances of your instrument. Get in the habit of playing with your most beautiful sound even on technical material.
    • Solidify your best practices. Choose the perfect fingering for each and every note (don’t just fall back on what is already comfortable). Program your fingers to move in the most efficient and precise ways. Stabilize your breath support, voicing, and embouchure.
    • Be expressive. No need to go overboard—just give a subtle crescendo as you ascend and diminuendo as you descend. Add a little vibrato to warm things up. Make it automatic to find and express phrases.

    Whatever habits you solidify in your scale practice will be infused into everything else you play. A little carelessness with your multiplication tables or verb conjugations can result in a severe fault with your Mars rover’s circuits or a profound misunderstanding of French literature. Get the little things right.

  • The value of a musical instrument

    Photo, Fabrice ROSE

    My instruments are valuable. Here’s why:

    1. Most of them cost a lot of money. Replacing any of them would be expensive, possibly even prohibitively so. (If you haven’t already, get a good insurance policy from a company that specializes in musical instruments!)
    2. I worked hard at choosing them. When I bought my oboe, I went to the IDRS conference and tried over 50, maybe 100 of them. Finding a replacement oboe that I’m really happy with could mean trying another 50 or 100. Even if you’ve got the time, opportunities to do something like that are rare.
    3. I have invested a lot of time developing personal relationships with my instruments—getting to know their intonation and response tendencies, getting comfortable with the feel of the keywork, finding out how to coax “my” sound from them. Even replacing one with another of the same make and model means starting fresh with a stranger.
  • Making every marking audible

    Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases, at no cost to you.

    When my students work on études (musical pieces intended for study but not performance) I stress with them the idea of making everything on the page audible. That means that if I were unfamiliar with the étude but a skilled transcriber, I could listen to my student play, and write down with confidence every:

    • Pitch
    • Rhythm
    • Articulation
    • Dynamic marking
    • Tempo change
    • Breath mark
    • Expressive marking, like “dolce” or “pesante” or “broadly”
    • Title or form indication, like “Aria” or “Folk Dance” or “Rondo”
    • And any/all other words or symbols left by the composer/editor

    Sometimes it’s easy to get wrapped up in the pitches and rhythms and ignore or gloss over some of the other markings. But all of them have to be executed in a clearly audible way (otherwise, what are they there for?). If a performer technically tongues some notes but they sound slurred, then they weren’t tongued right. If some notes are marked with horizontal accents (like >), and some are marked with vertical ones (like ^), then they have to sound audibly different from each other. If the composer indicates that a certain passage should be played “dolce,” then it needs to sound audibly different from passages that don’t have that marking.

    In performance repertoire, I do think there are (rare) cases when it makes sense to ignore or alter the composer or editor’s markings. But well-edited études (my students most commonly play Ferling or Rose) are an excellent opportunity to practice making each and every marking meet the ear with clarity and precision.

  • Technical limits

    If I try to play too softly, sometimes my notes don’t respond as I would like. If I try to play too loudly, sometimes my tone or intonation suffer. I have similar limitations when it comes to things like finger or tongue speed, tone color or pitch flexibility, and more.

    The way I deal with these limits is very different depending on whether I’m performing or practicing.

    If I’m performing, I want to stay just within my limits. I want every note to be predictable and reliable. I want to take advantage of every bit of my dynamic range, but no more. I want to make wise, deliberate, professional-quality choices.

    If I’m practicing, I want to explore those limits. Push those limits. Live just beyond those limits. It’s important to do this for couple of reasons. First, if I don’t go past those limits, I won’t know where the limits are for my upcoming performance. Second, if I’m too afraid to go past the limits in the practice room, I’ll never expand them. And if something goes wrong—a note cracks or fails to speak or is out of tune—that’s okay, it’s just practice.

    Find your limits, know them well, and, in your practice space, break them.

  • Time-crunch vs. long-term practicing

    My approach to practicing has to adapt to deadlines. Sometimes the deadlines come up fast, and there isn’t time to make everything as perfect as I would like. Other times I have plenty of preparation time and want to make the best use of it.

    Suppose the music I’m working on has one or two especially challenging spots, and I know I could put many hours into trying to perfect them. If I get bogged down trying to make those couple of spots perfect on a tight deadline, I might fail to adequately prepare the rest. It’s a better strategy to make sure I’m ready to play 98% of the music at tempo, make a reasonable effort with the remaining 2%, and hope for the best.

    But if I have plenty of time to prepare, that approach can backfire. Getting the 2% “good enough” early in the process may mean compromises that I have to undo later. I’ll have a better final result if I’m not in a hurry to bring the tough spots up to standard. Instead, I give them time to settle deeply into muscle memory before pushing the tempo. I practice difficult spots for a few minutes every day, instead of cramming.

    Think carefully about your practice approach, and adapt as needed. Good luck!

2 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments that take a negative or confrontational tone are subject to email and name verification before being approved. In other words: no anonymous trolls allowed—take responsibility for your words.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.