Saxophone vibrato

ByBret Pimentel

What is vibrato?

Carl Seashore, in his In Search of Beauty in Music, defines “good” vibrato as “a pulsation of pitch usually accompanied by synchronous pulsations of loudness and timbre, of such extent and rate as to give a pleasing flexibility, tenderness, and richness to the tone.”

Debate over saxophone vibrato

Saxophone vibrato is a controversial topic for several reasons. In fact, some have questioned whether vibrato should be used at all. Paul Berler, in a 1996 Saxophone Journal article, notes that wind instrumentalists have only made serious study of vibrato in the last century. Robert Luckey points out in a 1983 article in Woodwind, Brass, & Percussion that “prominent saxophone teachers have equated their instrument with the human voice,” and that, since vibrato is accepted as a natural embellishment of the human voice, it should be accepted as a natural part of the saxophone tone.

Several methods of producing vibrato are available to the saxophonist. The most comprehensive list is given by David Liebman:

Bouncing the diaphragm is the most pronounced form of vibrato. This is similar to the feeling of quickly inhaling and exhaling…

A feeling of vibrating in the larynx area or more exactly, the vocal cords which is used by vocalists.

Moving the jaw in a quick up and down motion which dramatically effects the pitch, and volume, was favored by the jazz players of earlier eras as well as certain dance band styles such as Guy Lombardo.

Backward and forward movement of the hump portion of the tongue towards the soft palate produces a peculiar and fairly subtle vibrato.

The most subtle form is achieved by minute movements of the lips.

Larry Teal points out that the jaw vibrato is the type used by the majority of professional performers, and most sources likewise conclude that jaw vibrato is the method that generally produces the most satisfactory results.

Variable aspects

An important variable of saxophone vibrato is the rate of pulsation. Luckey suggests a rate of 300-400 undulations per minute for soprano and alto saxophone, or 260-360 for tenor and baritone. Teal does not specify different rates for different instruments, but says that four pulsations per beat at a metronome marking of 80-84-equivalent to 320-336 pulses per minute-is the “going rate” (in 1963). He comments that a saxophonist should be able to produce vibrato anywhere from 240 to 360 pulses per minute for a reasonable amount of time without fatigue.

Berler’s article indicates that during vibrato pitch travels downward from the initial pitch and returns to that point, never rising above the initial pitch. Most sources seem to agree, although, according to Anthony Ciccarelli, at least two notable saxophone teachers have opposed this view. Alfred Gallodoro reportedly wrote:

In producing the vibrato, start the tone on the correct pitch and vary the pitch upward from the basic pitch, then back down again. A vibrato produced by varying pitch below the basic pitch will make your playing sound flat.

Sigurd Rascher is quoted by Ciccarelli as saying that the saxophone “should be tuned slightly sharp; then, when actually playing with vibrato, the tone is allowed to dip a little to exactly where it is wanted.”

Different styles of vibrato are used in different types of saxophone music. According to Dr. Keith R. Young:

A classical vibrato usually starts at the beginning of a note and is generally more controlled, faster, and narrower. Jazz vibrato varies from slow to fast but often commences after the note is sustained. The difference in vibrato styles is evident whenever a student uses jazz vibrato in a wind ensemble or plays a jazz ballad with a controlled, classical vibrato.

Teaching vibrato

According to Luckey, the saxophone student is ready to begin study of the vibrato when he or she meets several requirements: first, the ability to play the full range of the instrument with good tone quality; second, the embouchure is well developed with a balance of firmness and relaxedness; and third, abdominal breath support is strong and habitual.

Most writings on saxophone vibrato suggest using a model syllable to approximate the correct jaw movement for jaw vibrato. The most commonly recommended is “wah,” but Kenneth Fischer prefers “vah” because it better isolates the jaw movement and eliminates undue tension.

Writers on the topic agree that vibrato should be practiced evenly at first, with a certain number of pulses to each beat of the metronome (usually set to about 60, gradually building speed). However, they also agree that vibrato in performance should not be tied to tempo. Many also explain that vibrato may vary in rate during performance according to the performer’s interpretation.

Larry Teal’s The Art of Saxophone Playing contains several exercises for practicing vibrato. These cover the full range of the instrument, including leaps of large intervals and a dynamic range of pianissimo to fortissimo. They also deal with issues of alternating long, vibrato-enhanced notes with faster, technical passages.

Conclusions

The modern concert saxophonist should use a fairly fast, controlled jaw vibrato. The vibrato should begin immediately and should continue for the duration of the note. The rate of vibrato should not be tied to tempo. Pitch should, in most cases, dip below the centered pitch and then return, although some difference of opinion exists.

Vibrato should ultimately be no more than an element of the overall saxophone sound, adding color and expression without becoming a distraction to the listener.

Bibliography

Berler, Paul. “Basic Saxophone Skills: Vibrato,” Saxophone Journal 21, no. 2 (September/October 1996): 14-15.

Berler, Paul. “Colors in Sound: Vibrato,” Saxophone Journal 23, no. 6 (July/August 1999): 30-31.

Ciccarelli, Anthony Joseph. A Study of Vibrato as Applied to Clarinet and Saxophone Performance. London: University Microfilms International, 1970.

Fischer, Kenneth. “Saxophone Playing Techniques,” Saxophone Journal 16, no. 4 (January/February 1992): 41-42.

Liebman, David. Developing a Personal Saxophone Sound. Medfield, Mass: Dorn, 1989.

Teal, Larry. The Art of Saxophone Playing. Miami: Summy-Birchard, 1963.

Young, Keith R. “Saxophone Versatility,” The Instrumentalist 51, no. 4 (November 1996): 50-56.

Similar Posts

  • Novelty and solo multiple-woodwind performance

    ByBret Pimentel

    For a decade now, virtually every solo recital I have played has involved multiple woodwind instruments. I enjoy the variety and the challenge, and audiences are always duly appreciative and complimentary.

    However, I do wonder sometimes about the novelty aspect of using multiple woodwind instruments in solo “classical” performance. Often well-intentioned (and much-appreciated!) audience members will tell me something like, “It’s so amazing that you can play all those instruments!” That’s nice of them, but would they say something similar at a single-instrument recital? “It’s so amazing that you can play that instrument.”

    Photo, José Camba
    Photo, José Camba

    I’ve leveraged the variety a couple of times recently to do composer-themed recitals, one of music by Debussy and one of music by Telemann. On a single instrument, I would mostly shy away from playing an hour of music by a single composer. Such a thing could be done, but to make it a real success would require both a very engaging performer and an appropriate audience: for listeners with a casual appreciation of classical music, an hour of Bach flute sonatas or an hour of Brahms clarinet sonatas could be a bit of a drag. My recent Telemann sonata included music performed on six different solo instruments, two of them relatively rarely-heard (recorder and EWI), and that seemed to be enough to keep the audience on board.

    But were they on board purely because of the composer’s and performers’ art, or was it the feat of instrumental derring-do that held their interest? Of course I would like for my performances to stand on their own, regardless of how many or how few instruments I use, but it’s hard to tell when the audience is distracted by the parade of shiny objects. I’m not bothered by having a gimmick per se, but I don’t want it to be the only thing holding the performance together.

  • Selecting alternate fingerings

    ByBret Pimentel

    When several fingerings are available for a note, how do you choose the “right” one for a situation? Below are some criteria you might use in that decision, but be aware that it is virtually always impossible to meet all the criteria, so you have to choose the one that best balances the pros and cons.

    fingerings
    make cool fingering diagrams with the Fingering Diagram Builder
    • Which one would involve moving the fewest fingers? (Look at the previous note and the following note.) In general, moving fewer fingers is safer because it reduces the risk that the fingers will fail to move at exactly the same time.
    • Which one lets you make tidy, positive motions like lowering a finger onto a key or lifting it up from a key? Sliding fingers from key to key is harder to do accurately.
    • Which one lets you keep most or all of your fingers moving in the same direction? It is easier to keep your fingers synchronized if they are all either pressing down together or rising up together.
    • Which one keeps the movement in one hand? It is easier to keep your fingers synchronized if all the moving fingers are on the right hand, or all on the left hand.
    • Do the fingerings have different pitch tendencies? Does one sound more in tune in this situation? (It may be necessary to consider “just” intonation.)
    • Do the fingerings sound different tone-wise? Which one best matches the tone of the surrounding notes?
    • Do the fingerings have different response characteristics?

    That might seem like a lot of mental effort just for one note, but if you practice conscientiously over the long term, it will become more and more automatic. In the meantime, use a pencil to mark in reminders for which fingerings to use on things you are practicing.

  • How to do long tones (and why)

    ByBret Pimentel

    Long tones are at the core of most woodwind warmup routines. The most simple and obvious version is this:

    Long tone whole note with a fermata.

    Simple sustained notes are good for developing consistent breath support, which is required to keep the long tone steady in pitch, volume, and tone color. (Some teachers also suggest them for developing “embouchure strength,” one of the harmful and pervasive myths of woodwind playing.)

    Many players and teachers recommend a version more like this:

    Long tone whole note with a fermata, and with a crescendo and decrescendo.

    This is a worthwhile improvement, as dynamic change requires a flexible and relatively relaxed embouchure on top of steady breath support. Exercises like the Herzberg long tones use this concept.

    But I like this even better:

    Long tone with three tied whole notes. The first crescendos from niente to fortississimo. The third decrescendos to niente. There is a tempo marking of quarter note = 60.

    The first thing to notice is the addition of extreme dynamic markings, from niente (“nothing,” essentially zero volume) to fff (which should be understood here as maximum controlled volume). Achieving a note that starts from 0%, crescendos smoothly and evenly to 100%, and then back to 0%, is much more specific and demanding than just a general “get louder, then softer.” It requires powerful breath support that starts before the note sounds and continues until after it ends, as well as a tuned-in voicing and well-functioning equipment. (And it can serve as a diagnostic to find issues in these areas.) Exercises like the David Weber chromatic exercises use this approach. (At the link, scroll down to “Longtone 1.”

    Less-advanced players should start and end as softly as possible and work toward a true niente. Players at all levels should take the opportunity to discover and then improve their loudest dynamic level.

    The second thing to notice is the addition of a tempo marking. This demands that the dynamic changes happen within a specific timeline, as of course they do in real-world music. Faster or slower tempos than the one marked here may be used; each presents its own challenges.

    A very thorough long tone warmup might involve playing these on every note within the instrument’s range. Each will have slightly (or severely!) different demands. For a more practical approach, consider a rotation: on day one, do these on the instrument’s lowest note, and the note a fifth above that (or some other interval), a fifth above that, and so forth. The next day, start on the second-lowest note, and the next day the note above that, and so forth.

    Happy practicing!

  • What to listen for (or ignore) in cane vs. synthetic reed comparisons

    ByBret Pimentel

    With the recent release of the second-generation Venn clarinet and saxophone reeds from D’Addario Woodwinds, there’s a new rush of YouTube videos and social media posts comparing them to cane reeds (and/or to other synthetics). Here are a few questions raised by those kinds of comparisons that you should be cautious of:

    • “Do synthetic reeds sound as good as cane?” You could decide whether one of the specific reeds in question sounds better to you, but if it’s the cane one, does that mean that all cane reeds are better-sounding than all synthetics? You could almost certainly find a cane reed that would sound much worse than either of the ones tested. Plus, if you’re hearing a comparison to a seasoned player’s favorite reeds, it’s likely that those are the reeds the player used to select their mouthpiece, and that they have been practicing and performing on for years. You may be hearing the new reed being played on a mouthpiece or embouchure to which it’s not well-matched.
    • “Can you tell the difference between cane and synthetic?” Would you be able to tell the difference between two different cane reeds? In many cases the difference between two high-quality, similarly-purposed reeds is audible (if subtle). Being able to hear a difference between this specific cane reed and that specific synthetic reed isn’t particularly remarkable or important. I’m not aware of any manufacturer claiming their synthetic reeds sound identical to any specific cane reed (even in the case of D’Addario, who is making both; they consider the Venn to be a new “cut” of reed, not a clone of one of their cane products).
    • “Is this synthetic reed the best-sounding of all reeds?” Tone is important, but remember to consider other factors. Sure, that includes response/articulation, pitch, etc., but it should also include some of the potential upsides of synthetics, like longevity, stability, and consistency. If a synthetic only “sounds” 98% as good as your cane reeds, but it lasts for months, isn’t affected by weather, and plays identically to others of the same model, is it worth it to you to switch? Is it likely that the 2% gap will narrow or even disappear with some practice and tweaks to your setup?

    Here is a better question to ask yourself as you consume the reviews, videos, comments, etc.:

    • Do I hear evidence that this is a viable reed? In other words, is it possible to sound good on it, in a way that’s competitive with my current favorites? (A comparison to a player’s old standby reeds can be useful here.) If the answer is yes, then you can decide whether you wish to pursue the possibility further. If the answer is no, that only tells you that you weren’t impressed by that specific demonstration; the reeds might work quite well for another player, another mouthpiece, etc.

    New products are exciting! But keep a level head.

    (Full disclosure: I have in the past made exactly the kind of comparison I’m criticizing here, but no longer think it’s that useful of a format.)

  • Flutist/flautist

    ByBret Pimentel

    “Flautist” is a pet peeve of mine. I just encountered it again in a message board thread.

    These are worth a read:
    Am I a Flutist, or a Flautist?
    Is it Flutist or Flautist?

    To summarize: there doesn’t seem to be any good reason for English-speaking people to say “flautist.” Read More “Flutist/flautist”

  • New Grove on flute materials

    ByBret Pimentel

    The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians is widely used by college music students and is regarded by most (for better or for worse) as the unimpeachable source of all musical knowledge. In my studies for upcoming doctoral comprehensive exams, I ran across this in the “Flute” article:

    Materials used for the tube and mechanism include nickel-silver, sterling silver, gold and platinum, while the springs are usually of tempered steel or phosphor bronze, occasionally of gold or another metal. The choice of material, especially for the head joint, influences the flute’s tone: wooden flutes produce a rich tone with a very full fortissimo in the lower register; metal flutes produce a limpid, flexible tone with great carrying power and also allow the player very sensitive control over the tone-colour; gold produces a mellow sound while silver is more brilliant. To achieve a combination of these qualities a head joint of wood or gold is sometimes fitted to a tube of silver.

    The idea of different materials having different sounds is, of course, seen as conventional wisdom by flutists (and indeed by wind players in general), but it flies in the face of 100 years of acoustical science. Read More “New Grove on flute materials”

3 Comments

  3. Pingback: How to Fatten Your Sax Sound | Pro Music Tutor Blog

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments that take a negative or confrontational tone are subject to email and name verification before being approved. In other words: no anonymous trolls allowed—take responsibility for your words.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.