Saxophone vibrato

What is vibrato?

Carl Seashore, in his In Search of Beauty in Music, defines “good” vibrato as “a pulsation of pitch usually accompanied by synchronous pulsations of loudness and timbre, of such extent and rate as to give a pleasing flexibility, tenderness, and richness to the tone.”

Debate over saxophone vibrato

Saxophone vibrato is a controversial topic for several reasons. In fact, some have questioned whether vibrato should be used at all. Paul Berler, in a 1996 Saxophone Journal article, notes that wind instrumentalists have only made serious study of vibrato in the last century. Robert Luckey points out in a 1983 article in Woodwind, Brass, & Percussion that “prominent saxophone teachers have equated their instrument with the human voice,” and that, since vibrato is accepted as a natural embellishment of the human voice, it should be accepted as a natural part of the saxophone tone.

Several methods of producing vibrato are available to the saxophonist. The most comprehensive list is given by David Liebman:

Bouncing the diaphragm is the most pronounced form of vibrato. This is similar to the feeling of quickly inhaling and exhaling…

A feeling of vibrating in the larynx area or more exactly, the vocal cords which is used by vocalists.

Moving the jaw in a quick up and down motion which dramatically effects the pitch, and volume, was favored by the jazz players of earlier eras as well as certain dance band styles such as Guy Lombardo.

Backward and forward movement of the hump portion of the tongue towards the soft palate produces a peculiar and fairly subtle vibrato.

The most subtle form is achieved by minute movements of the lips.

Larry Teal points out that the jaw vibrato is the type used by the majority of professional performers, and most sources likewise conclude that jaw vibrato is the method that generally produces the most satisfactory results.

Variable aspects

An important variable of saxophone vibrato is the rate of pulsation. Luckey suggests a rate of 300-400 undulations per minute for soprano and alto saxophone, or 260-360 for tenor and baritone. Teal does not specify different rates for different instruments, but says that four pulsations per beat at a metronome marking of 80-84-equivalent to 320-336 pulses per minute-is the “going rate” (in 1963). He comments that a saxophonist should be able to produce vibrato anywhere from 240 to 360 pulses per minute for a reasonable amount of time without fatigue.

Berler’s article indicates that during vibrato pitch travels downward from the initial pitch and returns to that point, never rising above the initial pitch. Most sources seem to agree, although, according to Anthony Ciccarelli, at least two notable saxophone teachers have opposed this view. Alfred Gallodoro reportedly wrote:

In producing the vibrato, start the tone on the correct pitch and vary the pitch upward from the basic pitch, then back down again. A vibrato produced by varying pitch below the basic pitch will make your playing sound flat.

Sigurd Rascher is quoted by Ciccarelli as saying that the saxophone “should be tuned slightly sharp; then, when actually playing with vibrato, the tone is allowed to dip a little to exactly where it is wanted.”

Different styles of vibrato are used in different types of saxophone music. According to Dr. Keith R. Young:

A classical vibrato usually starts at the beginning of a note and is generally more controlled, faster, and narrower. Jazz vibrato varies from slow to fast but often commences after the note is sustained. The difference in vibrato styles is evident whenever a student uses jazz vibrato in a wind ensemble or plays a jazz ballad with a controlled, classical vibrato.

Teaching vibrato

According to Luckey, the saxophone student is ready to begin study of the vibrato when he or she meets several requirements: first, the ability to play the full range of the instrument with good tone quality; second, the embouchure is well developed with a balance of firmness and relaxedness; and third, abdominal breath support is strong and habitual.

Most writings on saxophone vibrato suggest using a model syllable to approximate the correct jaw movement for jaw vibrato. The most commonly recommended is “wah,” but Kenneth Fischer prefers “vah” because it better isolates the jaw movement and eliminates undue tension.

Writers on the topic agree that vibrato should be practiced evenly at first, with a certain number of pulses to each beat of the metronome (usually set to about 60, gradually building speed). However, they also agree that vibrato in performance should not be tied to tempo. Many also explain that vibrato may vary in rate during performance according to the performer’s interpretation.

Larry Teal’s The Art of Saxophone Playing contains several exercises for practicing vibrato. These cover the full range of the instrument, including leaps of large intervals and a dynamic range of pianissimo to fortissimo. They also deal with issues of alternating long, vibrato-enhanced notes with faster, technical passages.

Conclusions

The modern concert saxophonist should use a fairly fast, controlled jaw vibrato. The vibrato should begin immediately and should continue for the duration of the note. The rate of vibrato should not be tied to tempo. Pitch should, in most cases, dip below the centered pitch and then return, although some difference of opinion exists.

Vibrato should ultimately be no more than an element of the overall saxophone sound, adding color and expression without becoming a distraction to the listener.

Bibliography

Berler, Paul. “Basic Saxophone Skills: Vibrato,” Saxophone Journal 21, no. 2 (September/October 1996): 14-15.

Berler, Paul. “Colors in Sound: Vibrato,” Saxophone Journal 23, no. 6 (July/August 1999): 30-31.

Ciccarelli, Anthony Joseph. A Study of Vibrato as Applied to Clarinet and Saxophone Performance. London: University Microfilms International, 1970.

Fischer, Kenneth. “Saxophone Playing Techniques,” Saxophone Journal 16, no. 4 (January/February 1992): 41-42.

Liebman, David. Developing a Personal Saxophone Sound. Medfield, Mass: Dorn, 1989.

Teal, Larry. The Art of Saxophone Playing. Miami: Summy-Birchard, 1963.

Young, Keith R. “Saxophone Versatility,” The Instrumentalist 51, no. 4 (November 1996): 50-56.

Similar Posts

  • Problem-specific vs. general solutions

    I hinted at this idea in my recent post about clarinet undertones:

    Many of the ideas shared by the distinguished authors seemed like just descriptions of good basic clarinet technique (“ensure correct, stable embouchure formation,” “establish breath support/air pressure before releasing tongue”). … If you can play with a beautiful, characteristic tone, mostly in tune, with good response, then your undertones are probably mostly gone already.

    For teachers it’s useful to be aware of this distinction: to solve my student’s specific problem, do I need a solution that is uniquely geared to that problem? Or is the problem just a symptom of a larger failure to use good basic playing technique?

    In terms of the clarinet undertone example, just ensuring good basic technique does a great deal to solve the problem, but due to a quirk of the instrument’s acoustics, extraordinary measures are required to finish the job. Woodwind playing is full of similar phenomena.

    I find solidification of my fundamental technique to be an ongoing and critical part of sounding my best, and most of the solution to most of my issues. It’s worthwhile to think carefully about when to introduce tricks or special techniques.

  • Woodwind doubling and oboe problems

    There’s an increasing expectation that woodwind doublers be competent and confident oboists. It can be a challenging double, but a worthwhile one. Many of my doubling gigs have come to me because of my ability and/or willingness to play the oboe. And even though it’s not my strongest instrument, there are considerable spans of my career during which I’ve made more money playing the oboe than any other instrument.

    Here are some of the common problems woodwind doublers, often coming from background in the single reed instruments, have with the oboe:

    Fingering awkwardness. Dedicated, conscientious practice of scales/arpeggios and technical material goes a long way here, but there are some additional considerations specific to the oboe.

    First, the oboe’s toneholes are rather widely spaced, maybe surprisingly so for clarinet and saxophone players. (This has to do with the oboe’s very narrow bore—the toneholes have to be quite small so as not to catastrophically weaken the instrument’s body, which means they have to be spaced widely to produce a scale.) This can be a cause of tension. Work diligently at keeping your hands relaxed. If it helps, use a neckstrap to further reduce hand strain.

    Second, the oboe, more than the other woodwinds, tends to have more keys the more you pay for it. It’s very worthwhile to save up for an oboe with a left F key, and to learn to use it fluently. The left F key should be seen as part of the instrument’s core fingering technique. Many of the other keys available on professional or semi-professional instruments are less-used, but valuable in specific situations.

    Uneven tone and intonation. The oboe requires a very low voicing, lower than a saxophonist is used to and much lower than a clarinetist is used to. It also offers little forgiveness for weak or inconsistent breath support. Learn to balance low voicing against steady support to even out the instrument’s sound and stabilize its pitch. (Like fellow conical-bore instruments the saxophone and the bassoon, the oboe’s response suffers particularly in the lowest register when your voicing is too high.)

    Similarly, embouchure should remain open, not pinched, regardless of register. Remember that the embouchure’s function is to be a mostly-passive gasket between your air system and the instrument. Resist the urge to bite when moving into the highest register—rely on good breath support instead.

    Overall response sluggishness/unreliability. My experience is that many, many intermediate (and especially self-taught) oboists are playing on reeds that are far too stiff. If your notes won’t respond reliably and delicately at a soft dynamic, and you’re sure your breath support, voicing, and embouchure are working well, you should consider a more responsive reed.

    Because oboe reeds are so susceptible to change, the best way to sound like a pro reed-wise is to spend a few years’ worth of lessons learning to make (or at least adjust) them yourself. Failing that, it’s worth it to buy reeds face-to-face from a good reedmaker, rather than from a music store or a distant internet reedmaker, so that they can adjust them for you on the spot. Reeds from a local reedmaker are also adapted to your altitude and climate.

    Another important and ongoing concern is adjustment of the instrument itself. The oboe has many adjustment screws that need occasional tweaking. It’s best of course to learn this art under the supervision of a good teacher. But if you’re mechanically-inclined and have a good oboe technician standing by to bail you out, there are a number of books and resources that explain the method in a clear and methodical way. A small tweak here and there can transform a stuffy, stubborn oboe into a responsive, cooperative instrument that is a joy to play.

    Approach the oboe on its own terms, equipped with good reeds and a good grasp of tone-production fundamentals, and enjoy!

  • Working less hard

    As a 10-year-old brand-new saxophonist, I learned a bunch of tasks I needed to do to play the instrument: blow in a certain way, form my lips just so, put my fingers into such-and-such positions, and so on. Every time I thought I had learned all of the skills I needed, my teacher would add some more.

    In the 30 years since, playing saxophone and other woodwinds, I have mostly worked on doing less—letting my embouchure relax, keeping my jaw still, keeping my breath support consistent, moving my fingers more efficiently. The more I can strip away the excess effort, the more my playing is easy, pleasant, pain-free, fatigue-free, and expressive.

    On some level it feels more like teaching if I can tell a student a new thing to do. Assign them an additional task. But the most productive and valuable lessons (or personal practice sessions) are often the ones when I can convince a student (or myself) to do one fewer thing.

  • Multi-instrument method in Rahsaan Roland Kirk’s “Creole Love Call”

    The artist1

    Roland Kirk was born in 1935. As an infant, he was blinded, possibly by negligent medical care. He attended the Ohio State School for the blind, where he played in the school band. At the age of sixteen, he led a dance band that performed around the Midwest. It was also at age sixteen that he got the idea to play more than one instrument at once, an innovation he claimed to have received in a dream. He acquired a battery of instruments, including such oddities as the stritch and manzello (obsolete cousins of the saxophone), and set about mastering them individually and in combination.

    Kirk recorded as early as 1956, but got little attention until 1960, when critics began to accuse him of gimmickry. Kirk maintained that his unorthodox techniques were born of musical expression rather than cheap showmanship, and his following began to increase.

    In 1970, he added “Rahsaan” to his name, having been prompted to do so by another dream. Read More “Multi-instrument method in Rahsaan Roland Kirk’s “Creole Love Call””

  • The future of woodwind instruments

    Here are a few predictions (or wishes) about the woodwind instruments we might be able to buy in the future.

    Personalized ergonomics

    With the amount of worry musicians expend over repetitive motion injuries and other playing-related ailments, it’s truly baffling that instruments are still almost entirely a one-size-fits-all affair.

    For just one example: for generations, saxophonists have applied cork or other stuff to their palm keys to help avoid collapsing the hand to press them. Most of the finest saxophones in the world still offer palm keys in a single height, meant to accommodate child and adult hands, male and female hands, large and small hands. (A couple of exceptions are Keilwerth’s wrench-adjustable left hand palm keys, and Cannonball’s “Stone Series” instruments, which can be purchased or retrofitted with stone touchpieces of varying heights for both left and right palm keys.) And this is only one of the ergonomic issues of saxophones and other woodwinds.

    Imagine buying a production woodwind instrument that had fully adjustable keywork that could be matched to your individual hands. This could be done with interchangeable parts, or with keywork adjustable via screws or other means.

    Related to this is a need to re-examine the possibilities of plateau (“closed”) keys. Most of the modern woodwinds have at least some fingerholes or keys with holes in them, and these cannot be moved to accommodate ergonomics without affecting pitch and tone. But the touchpieces on a saxophone or bass clarinet can largely be located according to convenience, to open or close toneholes somewhere else on the instrument’s body. Our largely unfounded derision of plateau keys on woodwind instruments prevents us from embracing much better ergonomic possibilities.

    New materials

    Far too much credit is given to materials, especially if those materials are costly and pretty, for their contribution to an instrument’s sound. Inventors have created incredible new materials for aerospace, automotive, and electronics applications. Why couldn’t we make woodwind instruments out of amazing new materials that are inexpensive, crack- and dent-resistant, sustainable, lightweight, and beautiful? (Buffet-Crampon’s “Greenline” instruments are an example of high-quality instruments made from synthetic materials.)

    A move to new materials could reduce investment in instrument purchase and maintenance, prevent the heartbreak of a new clarinet or oboe cracking, stop over-harvesting of certain woods, and reduce repetitive-motion injuries.

    And it wouldn’t be the first time woodwind players gave up traditional materials for better ones; there aren’t a lot of players still using boxwood flutes and clarinets.

    Imagine, too, the possibilities of reeds and pads that are long-lasting, stable, and consistent.

    Player-maintainable

    It’s axiomatic among woodwind players that good instrument technicians are getting harder to find. In my rural area, it’s a 2½-hour drive to a city where I can get my high-quality instruments worked on competently, by people doing instrument repair in their homes rather than in music stores or commercial repair shops.

    Many woodwind instruments have at least some adjustment screws or other relatively intuitive ways to keep them adjusted and playing well. Installing pads is still somewhat of a specialist art, but imagine how that could change with improved materials for pads and for toneholes, and with approaches like MusicMedic’s “self-leveling” Neo Pads.

    Imagine instruments that are user-adjustable using common household tools or tools included with the instrument, supplemented with detailed instructional videos. Some routine tasks like pad or bumper replacement could become the player’s responsibility, or something that could be done by a minimally-trained music store employee, school band director, or private teacher.

    Your turn

    Let me know what features and qualities you would like to see in the woodwind instruments of the future!

  • Does woodwind doubling ruin your embouchure?

    Nope.

    We use our embouchure muscles for all kinds of things: facial expressions, speech, eating, kissing. Do any of those things “ruin” your embouchure? Of course not. The embouchure is made up of very flexible, agile muscles that are very capable of carrying out multiple tasks.

    When people (almost always non-doublers) express concern about embouchure ruin, most of the time what they seem to be talking about is tension, or sensitivity loss, or buildup of callused tissue, or maybe strengthening the “wrong” muscles. If playing any woodwind instrument is giving you these kinds of problems, you are playing it wrong. Your embouchure for any and every woodwind instrument should be relaxed, balanced, and pain-free. Get some lessons with a qualified teacher, quickly.

    Woodwind doubling presents real challenges. No need to invent fictional ones!

3 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments that take a negative or confrontational tone are subject to email and name verification before being approved. In other words: no anonymous trolls allowed—take responsibility for your words.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.