Skip to content
Bret Pimentel, woodwinds

Bret Pimentel, woodwinds

  • AboutExpand
    • Cookie Policy
  • Resources and toolsExpand
    • Woodwind Doubling in Musicals
    • Fingering Diagram Builder
    • Random Note Picker
    • Note Image Generator
    • More…
  • Lessons
  • Shop
Email YouTube TikTok Facebook Instagram Amazon RSS
Bret Pimentel, woodwinds
Bret Pimentel, woodwinds
  • Report: 2016 International Double Reed Society conference
    Announcements and news

    Report: 2016 International Double Reed Society conference

    ByBret Pimentel July 4, 2016July 19, 2022

    I had a blast at the 2016 International Double Reed Society conference, hosted by Columbus State University in Columbus, Georgia. As I have said before, the IDRS puts on an outstanding conference, maybe my favorite of the various woodwind conferences I attend. Very well organized, with lots of outstanding talent, varied events, and presences from all the top makers and dealers of double reed instruments and gear.

    A few personal highlights:

    • Excellent evening concerts, some with chamber music and some with orchestra. Too many great performances to do justice to them all, but a couple that stood out in my mind were the premiere of Alan Elkins’s double oboe concerto with Elizabeth Koch Tiscione and Kathryn Greenbank, and Cary Ebli‘s performance of his own edition of the Donizetti Concertino for English horn.

      double-concerto_mini
      Elizabeth Koch Tiscione and Kathryn Greenbank
    • Too many recitals to count. I liked, among others, Joey Salvalaggio‘s “When Giant Babies Attack,” Paul Hanson‘s always-astonishing solo bassoon with electronics, the Paradise Winds reed quintet, Benjamin Coelho with Andrew Parker, Eric Stomberg with Barry Stees, and Mark Ostoich with Alyssa Morris and Petrea Warneck playing Morris’s new and outstanding trio for two oboes and English horn.

      hanson_mini
      Paul Hanson sound check, with appropriate reaction from conference volunteer
    • Some very interesting lectures and presentations. A few favorites were Mark Eubanks‘s on bassoon reed tuning, Jamie Sampson‘s on her methodical research into bassoon multiphonics, and Janet Grice‘s on adapting Brazilian choros to double reed instruments.
    • I gave a presentation on teaching multiple instruments. You can check out my handout/lecture notes if you like.
    • I got to meet or reconnect with lots of cool people, including some who, to my delight and surprise, introduced themselves as “fans” of this blog or of my other online stuff. I’m always happy to connect with nice people who find my stuff useful or interesting in some way.
    • And I did come home with a, uh, souvenir:Paul Hanson sound check, with appropriate reaction from student volunteer
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Report: 2016 International Double Reed Society conferenceContinue

  • Favorite blog posts

    Favorite blog posts, June 2016

    ByBret Pimentel June 30, 2016January 1, 2018
    • Jenny Maclay gets a little judgy (not really) about deadly clarinet sins.
    • Flutist Meerenai Shim explains the “tongue ram” extended technique.
    • Clarinetist Denise Gainey shares somes memories of Kalman Opperman.
    • Jessica Valiente shares a chapter from her dissertation on charanga flute music.
    • Oboist Jennet Ingle submits her report from the International Double Reed Society conference. (Stay tuned for my own report.)
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Favorite blog posts, June 2016Continue

  • Woodwind playing and pedagogy

    Tonguing and language sounds

    ByBret Pimentel June 24, 2016March 14, 2017

    Be wary of pedagogical approaches to woodwind articulation that depend on analogies to speech sounds.

    The most common, at least in the English-speaking world, is the idea that tonguing is like saying “too” or “doo.” And certainly there are significant mechanical similarities, especially with “too.” “Doo” doesn’t work as well because it is a voiced consonant, produced essentially the same way as “too” but with vibration of the vocal cords, an undesirable effect for woodwind playing (except for some extended techniques).

    Some teachers recommend something like “too” for crisper articulations and “doo” for gentler ones. If you compare carefully your whispered (unvoiced) “t” and “d” sounds, you may find that they are not, in fact, completely identical. My “t” gives a bit more explosive sound, because I release the entire tongue, and my “d” is softer because I tend to release only the tip of the tongue, keeping the back in contact with my molars. But this difference doesn’t apply to good woodwind playing technique, in which the back of the tongue must be kept independent from the tip in order to manipulate voicing.

    “Loo” is another one that gets mentioned sometimes for gentler articulations. This one also doesn’t work well if taken literally because (1) the “l” sound is voiced and (2) it leaks air around the sides of the tongue. (You can approximate an unvoiced version by whispering “lll…,” but that sound isn’t typically used in English.) A woodwind book I read recently recommends some additional oddities like “droo” or “thoo.” “Droo” doesn’t work well because it has a sequence of two consonant tongue positions, one of which is voiced. “Thoo” (presumably the unvoiced version) leaks air near the tip of the tongue.

    Another point worth making is that consonant sounds in English aren’t necessarily the same as consonants in other languages, so even if we select some workable English consonant sounds, it’s not a given that those are the ideal choices. (Plenty of study has already been done on this topic.)

    And that’s just the consonants. Assuming they are used as a shorthand for describing articulations, with an understanding that they do not precisely represent articulation technique, vowel sounds can still cause confusion. Consider the “oo” in “too.” Vowel sounds are loosely analogous to woodwind voicings, so it is best to match the vowels to the instrument. Is “oo” the right voicing to evoke?

    For low-voiced instruments, an “oh”- or “ah”-like vowel sound is a better match. (“Oh” is still problematic because English speakers pronounce it as a diphthong, two vowel sounds in sequence—this will cause unstable pitch and tone when applied to a woodwind instrument. To avoid this, we must borrow an “o” sound from another language.) For the clarinet, “ee” is the closest match. For saxophones, the vowel sound needs to be somewhere in between, perhaps near the schwa (ə) sound like the “a” in “about.”

    Language sounds can be used only as a very limited analogy for woodwind articulation technique—use them with care.

    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Tonguing and language soundsContinue

  • Woodwind playing and pedagogy

    Woodwind instrument “care kits” are bad news

    ByBret Pimentel June 17, 2016March 14, 2017

    Congratulations on your new student-level flute, oboe, clarinet, bassoon, or saxophone! Your music store’s friendly sales associate (or your online retailer’s auto-suggest software) is probably insisting that you purchase a “care kit” as well. This kit ostensibly contains all the items you need to keep your new instrument working well and looking shiny. I recommend that you do not buy it, because it is, at best, a waste of your money, and, at worst, a hazard to the instrument’s wellbeing.

    photo, Greg Williams
    photo, Greg Williams

    Here are some of the items that frequently appear in these terrible kits:

    • Polishing cloths. Chemicals or polishes (liquid or embedded in cloths) can gum up pads and mechanisms. Students can “polish” their instruments with a soft, dry cloth, like a piece of an old t-shirt. Your repairperson can remove the keys and do a more thorough polishing safely.
    • Swabs. Woodwind instruments should definitely have swabs, but beware the kinds in these kits.
      Silk is preferable for pull-through swabs (oboe, clarinet, bassoon, saxophone) because it is absorbent and compressible, so it’s less likely to get stuck inside the instrument than a cheaper felt swab. Even for a student instrument, it’s worth a few extra dollars to get silk.

      "headjoint swabs"
      “headjoint swabs”

      For flutes, avoid “headjoint swabs” that are little oddly-shaped pieces of chamois (or a synthetic version), unless you want to have to fish them out of the headjoint every time you try to use them. Instead, use the cleaning rod that came with the flute, plus a strip of fabric cut from an old bed sheet.
      The fuzzy “cleaning” brushes that look like giant pipe cleaners, that you insert and leave inside the instrument, do exactly the wrong thing by keeping all the moisture inside the instrument, instead of wiping it out like a good swab does.

    • Cork grease. Yes, for instruments with parts that friction-fit together with cork, such as clarinets, oboes, and saxophones. Flutes don’t have any corked joints (though some piccolos do). Some bassoons have corked fittings, but some have thread wrappings instead. Use cork grease on cork only—never on thread-wrapped or metal-to-metal joints.
    • Screwdrivers. Yikes! Woodwind instruments often have “adjustment” screws. Bored students and well-meaning dads can’t resist just tightening everything up, just to make sure. This leaves the instrument in unplayable condition, and only a professional can put those adjustment screws back just right.
    • Reed guards/cases. Yes! Keeping reeds in one of these generally keeps them intact and in playing condition for longer than the disposable ones that the reeds come in. Those little plastic or cardboard sleeves that clarinet and saxophone reeds come in don’t keep them flat when they dry. And oboe and bassoon reeds often come in tubes that are too flimsy for regular use, or hinged plastic cases that come apart in the instrument’s case, leaving the reeds to bounce around unprotected.
    • Mouthpiece brushes. These are basically little vegetable brushes, with scratchy synthetic bristles and the dreaded twisted-wire core, much too aggressive for cleaning clarinet and saxophone mouthpieces. Instead, try a gentle rinse with room-temperature water and a drop of mild dish detergent. Stephen Howard’s vinegar-and-cotton method is good for occasional deeper cleanings.
    • Neck or bocal brushes. Probably too aggressive for use on these particularly delicate and crucial instrument parts. Plus, a strong risk of getting something stuck.
    • “Tone hole cleaners.” These are usually garden-variety pipe cleaners. Tone hole cleaning isn’t a task for beginners to do. The pipe cleaners’ twisted-wire cores can damage toneholes, the instrument’s bore, or pads.
    • “Pad papers.” It’s really tempting to use a lot of pressure with these, which can distort pads and cause leaks. Some are coated with a powder—these operate on the same principle as getting some gum stuck on your shoe, then stepping in some dirt so the gum won’t keep sticking to the sidewalk when you walk.Pad papers and other powder treatments should be an emergency treatment applied wisely and carefully by a knowledgeable musician, not a daily treatment applied badly by a student.
    • Key-dusting brushes. Gently removing some dust from the instrument’s mechanism isn’t an all-bad idea, but be advised that it’s easy to knock springs and things out of place. The brushes in these kits usually have twisted-wire cores, which can scratch instruments’ finishes. Instead, consider using cheap kids’ watercolor paintbrushes. Or, even better, make sure the instrument gets professional maintenance and cleaning at least once a year.
    • Key oil. No, no, no. This is a job for a professional to do. Besides, the kind in these care kits is usually cheap 3-in-1-type oil. Even if applied properly, it tends to drip back out of the keywork onto fingers, or worse, pads.
    • Bore oil. Absolutely not. Using this at all (only in wooden instruments) is controversial. When you bring it in for its annual maintenance, your repairperson can apply bore oil properly and safely if they deem it necessary. (My opinion: if in doubt, don’t bother.)
    • Care manuals. These are generally provided to justify the other items in the care kit.

    Skip the care kit—they are a way for retailers to squeeze a few more dollars out of you at purchase, and then more when you bring the instrument back in to fix the damage you have done with your brushes and oils and screwdrivers.

    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Woodwind instrument “care kits” are bad newsContinue

  • Career

    Stuff bad music teachers say

    ByBret Pimentel June 10, 2016March 14, 2017

    We can all stand to improve our teaching. Here are some things I’ve either said or heard said that are symptomatic of gaps in pedagogical knowledge.

    “I’ve been doing it this way for years and I’m very successful.”

    Nobody is arguing with your success. But success isn’t a reason to stop improving, nor is it evidence of a perfect approach. Be open to new ideas. Choose to accept or reject a new approach based on its merits, not based on inertia.

    “My famous and well-respected teacher taught it to me this way.”

    The craft doesn’t progress if your let hero worship blind you to new ideas. Would your teachers want you to cling to outdated pedagogy out of loyalty, or to further your knowledge and advance the discipline?

    “Well, those scientific results don’t matter, because this is music and it can’t be studied in that way. I think musicians know a little more about music than scientists, don’t you?”

    Sound is a phenomenon very observable, measurable, and understandable through empirical study. Don’t worry, more information won’t ruin the magic. Take the example of high-level athletes and embrace careful, systematic scientific method as a means of achieving more.

    In woodwind teaching in particular, I hear a lot of vague, contradictory, or fantastical ideas that fall apart after even a cursory study of anatomy, acoustics, or fluid dynamics.

    And, just like you wouldn’t expect a stodgy old scientist to fully grasp the finer points of your musical performance, recognize your own limitations when it comes to scientific rigor. The Wikipedia article or a blog post you read probably aren’t very solid sources, and the experiment you did with different mouthpieces in your living room probably wouldn’t pass muster with a scholarly journal.

    “It’s not a contradiction.”

    If your teaching is making you and your students experience cognitive dissonance, getting defensive and brushing past the problem doesn’t help. Watch out for this kind of nonsense: “You have to increase the breath support as you go up to the high register. No, no, don’t reduce the breath support as you go back down to the low register.”

    “No, I haven’t read it.”

    Music teachers should be active readers of pedagogical materials new and old, and should be actively questioning what they read. (Attending masterclasses, watching videos, etc. is also good, but you will find someone’s clearest, most organized thinking when they have to commit it to paper and/or digital text.) Proliferation of small publishing companies, self-publishing operations, and, of course, the internet, have made the bar for “expertise” very low, but have also made it possible for conscientious readers to consume more and to police what is written. Readers shouldn’t take anything at face value, and authors shouldn’t expect a pass on low-quality work.

    Have the courage, conscience, and dedication to pursue deeper, broader, and more accurate knowledge of the concepts you are teaching!

    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Stuff bad music teachers sayContinue

  • Favorite blog posts

    Favorite blog posts, May 2016

    ByBret Pimentel May 31, 2016January 1, 2018
    • Saxophonist Michael Shults advocates a thoughtful approach to musical versatility (doubling, playing jazz and classical music, etc.).
    • Wistam Boustany discusses power vs. economy in flute playing.
    • Oboist Jennet Ingle compares methods of ensuring playable performance reeds.
    • Saxophonist Sven Seebeck suggests tips for trying out mouthpieces.
    • Rachel Taylor Geier explains the flute’s C-sharp trill key.
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Favorite blog posts, May 2016Continue

  • Woodwind playing and pedagogy

    Please stop telling your clarinet students to tighten their embouchures

    ByBret Pimentel May 17, 2016March 16, 2017

    “Tighten your embouchure” is bad advice for young clarinetists.

    That goes for young saxophonists, too, and really for any young woodwind players. But young clarinetists hear it often because their pitch is flat and their tone lacks focus. “Tighten your embouchure” gets thrown around as a fix-all, except it doesn’t fix all. It doesn’t fix anything. Unless your students are actually leaking air around the mouthpiece from utter slack-jawedness. In that case, they should tighten, but only a little.

    The real issue isn’t embouchure, it’s voicing. Good clarinet playing requires a high voicing. (The opposite of almost every other instrument in the beginning band.) That’s why your clarinet section is flat and tubby-sounding. Tell them to blow ice-cold air, which fixes the voicing problem. Train them to back it up with powerful breath support. Let them relax their embouchures—not tight, just airtight. And enjoy the clear, full, ringing, and in-tune sounds!

    photo, Melody Joy Kramer
    photo, Melody Joy Kramer
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Please stop telling your clarinet students to tighten their embouchuresContinue

  • Education | Woodwind playing and pedagogy

    Things you need to cover in woodwind methods class

    ByBret Pimentel May 11, 2016December 10, 2022

    If you are teaching a woodwind methods course, you might be interested in my book.

    A few years back I posted a rant about non-mission-critical information in woodwind methods textbooks.

    This is a course primarily for instrumental music majors, who will go on to become school band or orchestra directors, and who need a crash course in the playing and pedagogy of each instrument that will be in their future ensembles. At the places I’ve taught, it means taking students from zero to playing a little bit of flute, oboe, clarinet, bassoon, and saxophone, all in one semester. It’s a semester-long sprint.

    I went on to list things I have found in textbooks intended for these courses, which I think are distractions or filler or otherwise misguided.

    woodwind methods class
    photo, Ace Foundation

    What should a woodwind methods class focus on?

    • Fundamentals, fundamentals, fundamentals. Fundamentals. For woodwinds, the following are absolutely, non-negotiably crucial technical elements: breath support, voicing, embouchure, articulation, and finger technique. They must be understood and properly connected to audible elements: tone, intonation, response, volume/dynamics, and fluency (of finger movements). This material should probably make up 90%+ of lecture, readings, in-class activities, etc.
    • Woodwind-specific band-room survival skills: minor instrument repairs and adjustments, reading and interpreting fingering charts, woodwind transpositions, selecting equipment (this needs to be a much bigger conversation than just a list of brands and models), and matching students to instruments (hint: gender, anatomical factors within broad norms, and ill-conceived proficiency testing are not good ways of doing this).
    • Introduction to additional resources. One, two, or even several semesters are not enough to make a undergraduate student into an effective teacher of woodwinds; they need to know how and why to consult available pedagogical books, journals, and online materials.

    Also, disturbingly, I have been hearing occasionally from woodwind methods teachers who are choosing or are being encouraged to skip or minimize the double reeds and focus on flute, clarinet, and saxophone. (I even heard from a publisher alerting me to their woodwind methods textbook that does not cover the double reeds!) I think this is a disastrous side effect of a marching-band-centric approach to music education, and leaves future music educators woefully unprepared to lift their band programs above that level. You have to teach oboe and bassoon!

    The question I get a lot from new college professors about to teach their first woodwind methods course is which textbook to use. I don’t have a strong recommendation. Dietz and Westphal seem to be commonly used, but they are expensive and have the other problems I have previously described. I currently use some materials of my own with my woodwind classes, which may or may not at some point become available. If you like, join this mailing list and I’ll use it to spam you if I ever get everything edited into a book-like form. Update: the book is now available!

    Make sure you are using your woodwind class’s time well, preparing them to teach woodwind fundamentals clearly and thoroughly.

    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Things you need to cover in woodwind methods classContinue

  • Woodwind playing and pedagogy

    The role of tone exercises

    ByBret Pimentel May 4, 2016

    Tone exercises are useful, sort of. Read last month’s post about tone for a reminder why tone exercises are only part of the process.

    photo, valentina
    photo, valentina

    Here is what tone exercises do:

    • Excellent tone exercises demand solid fundamental tone-production technique, providing a chance to habituate useful muscular actions. Trevor Wye’s “Flexibility I” flute exercise is a perfect example. (I suggest you buy the whole Trevor Wye omnibus edition.) If your tone-production technique is correct, you can play the exercise successfully (in tune, in time, with all notes responding easily). But you will fail if your breath support, voicing, and/or embouchure are bad. If you are doing something wrong, you get immediate feedback.
    • Poorly-designed tone exercises lack that self-destruct trigger. Often the creators try to prop them up with text explaining fundamental technique: “Use strong breath support! Keep your embouchure flexible!” If that kind of textual instruction is necessary to make the exercise useful, then the content probably doesn’t really matter—it might as well be a single note with a fermata.
    • Regardless of quality, any exercise you do with tone in mind is an opportunity to focus on your tone. That’s a good thing.

    Seek out high-quality tone exercises and do them regularly, but don’t forget to listen.

    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More The role of tone exercisesContinue

  • Favorite blog posts

    Favorite blog posts, April 2016

    ByBret Pimentel April 30, 2016January 1, 2018
    • Saxophonist Steve Neff shares a Joe Allard overtone exercise. (Read the comments section, too.)
    • Clarinetist Diana Haskell shares some results of asking colleagues what are the most important things about orchestral playing.
    • Helen Bledsoe shares some flute intonation exercises (could be adapted to other instruments).
    • Clarinetist Jenny Maclay offers advice on dealing with the mental baggage of being a musician. (Reminder: blog posts are not a substitute for professional counseling.)
    • Woodwind doubler Kelsey Mire makes a case for fair pay for doublers.
    • Saxophonist Bill Plake digs into reasons inefficient practice techniques get perpetuated.
    • Bassoonist Nadina Mackie Jackson answers questions about gender in the classical music world.
    • Oboist Jennet Ingle seeks balance between expression and technique.
    • Woodwind doubler David Freeman shares a funny pit experience. There are possibly teachable moments there if you care to draw them out.
    • Cate Hummel discusses solutions to third-octave problems, as well as when to introduce dynamics and vibrato to students.
    • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
    • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
    • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
    • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
    • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

    Read More Favorite blog posts, April 2016Continue

Page navigation

Previous PagePrevious 1 … 38 39 40 41 42 … 87 Next PageNext

My book: Woodwind Basics

Woodwind Basics, by Bret Pimentel

Show appreciation




Tell Google you trust this site

Bret on YouTube

More…

Bret on TikTok

Posts by instrument

  • Bassoon
  • Clarinet
  • Flute
  • Oboe
  • Saxophone
  • Wind controller
  • Woodwind doubling
  • Woodwinds with electronics
  • World woodwinds

Posts by category

  • Announcements and news
  • Career
  • Education
  • Favorite blog posts
  • Fun
  • Musicianship
  • Product reviews
  • Web reviews
  • Woodwind playing and pedagogy

Posts by tag

  • practicing
  • equipment
  • jazz
  • reeds
  • recital
  • embouchure
  • books
  • fingering selection
  • musicals
  • Fingering Diagram Builder

Get posts by email

© 2026 Bret Pimentel, woodwinds

Scroll to top
  • About
    • Cookie Policy
  • Resources and tools
    • Woodwind Doubling in Musicals
    • Fingering Diagram Builder
    • Random Note Picker
    • Note Image Generator
    • More…
  • Lessons
  • Shop